This article aims to examine the trade effects of the South Asian Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) with a focus on Sri Lanka, by applying a gravity trade model. The study targets the following three FTAs: the SAFTA, the India–Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement (ISFTA), and the Pakistan–Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement (PSFTA). The outcomes of the gravity trade model estimation suggested that the trade creation effects were identified in the ISFTA, while those were not verified in the SAFTA and that the PSFTA had the trade creation effects only on the Sri Lankan imports. Those results seem to reflect the differentials in the preferential tariff rates. In particular, ISFTA could have the predominant positive effects on Sri Lankan trade flows due to its lowest preferential tariff rates, and thus the SAFTA effect might be crowded out at the current stage of Sri Lankan trade.
AkhterN.GhaniE. (2010). Regional integration in South Asia: An analysis of trade flows using the gravity model. The Pakistan Development Review, 49(2), 105–118.
2.
AndersonJ. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
3.
AndersonJ. E.van WincoopE. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.
4.
ArellanoM.BoverO. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
5.
BaierS. L.BergstrandJ. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95.
6.
BaysanT.PangariaA.PitigalaN. (2006). Preferential trading in South Asia (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No.3812). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
7.
BouetA.MevelS.ThomasM. (2010). Is SAFTA trade creating or trade diverting? A computable general equilibrium assessment with a focus on Sri Lanka (IFPRI Discussion Papers, No. 950). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
8.
DeardorffA. V. (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a classical world. In FrankelJ. A. (Ed.), The regionalization of the world economy (pp. 7–22). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
EggerH.EggerP.GreenawayD. (2008). The trade structure effects of endogenous reginal trade agreements. Journal of International Economics, 74(2), 278–298.
10.
EggerP.LarchM.StaubK. E.WinkelmannR. (2011). The trade effects of endogenous preferential trade agreements. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(3), 113–143.
11.
FrankelJ. A. (1997). Regional trading blocs. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
12.
GhoshS.YamarikS. (2004). Are regional trading arrangements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. Journal of International Economics, 63(2), 369–395.
13.
HelpmanE.KrugmanP. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MageeC. S. P. (2003). Endogenous preferential trade agreements: An empirical analysis. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 2(1), Article 15.
16.
MurtazashviliI.WooldridgeJ. M. (2016). A control function approach to estimating switching regression models with endogenous explanatory variables and endogenous switching. Journal of Econometrics, 190(2), 252–266.
17.
NufileA. A. M.SanthirasegaramS.IsmailS. M. M. (2013). Pakistan-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement (PSFTA): A comparison with SAARC and SAFTA. International Journal of Accounting and Business Management, 1(1), 121–137.
18.
OkabeM. (2015). Impact of free trade agreements on trade in East Asia (ERIA Discussion Paper Series, 2015-01). Jakarta: ERIA.
19.
PantM.PaulA. (2018). The role of regional trade agreements: In the case of India. Journal of Economic Integration, 33(3), 538–571.
20.
PereraM. S. S. (2008). Impact of the Indo-Sri Lanka free trade arrangement on the Sri Lankan economy: A computable general equilibrium analysis. South Asian Economic Journal, 9(1), 1–50.
21.
PöyhönenP. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90(1), 93–100.
22.
RoseA. K. (2000). One money, one market: Estimating the effect of common resources on trade. Economic Policy, 15(30), 9–45.
23.
Santos SilvaJ. M. C.TenreyroS. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658.
24.
SemykinaA.WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Estimating panel data models in the presence of endogeneity and selection. Journal of Econometrics, 157(2), 375–380.
25.
TinbergenJ. (1962). Shaping the world economy. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
26.
UrataS.OkabeM. (2014). Trade creation and diversion effects of regional trade agreements: A product-level analysis. The World Economy, 37(2), 267–289.
27.
VandenbusscheH.ZanardiM. (2010). The chilling trade effects of antidumping proliferation. European Economic Review, 54(6), 760–777.
28.
VinerJ. (1950). The customs union issue. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
