Some Common Lessons from Uncommon FTAs

Abstract

The present study endeavours to observe the trade creation and trade diversion effects of three free trade agreements (FTAs) in Asia, namely, India–Japan CEPA (IJCEPA), India–Sri Lanka FTA (ISFTA), and India–Bhutan FTA (IBFTA). The article aims to evaluate three uncommon FTAs that include developing–developed, developing–developing and developing–least developed countries. The objective is to evaluate the effects of these FTAs on exports and draw lessons for both the contracting parties and for other economies to commence FTAs that promote trade liberalization. This paper also aims to debunk the myth that FTAs between developing-least developed countries is not beneficial for the developing or least developed counterpart. The study applies augmented gravity model to capture the trade creation and trade diversion effects. The results confirm that ISFTA and IBFTA have trade creation effect, while in case of IJCEPA, there is trade diversion. These bilateral agreements can open the ways for multilateral trade liberalization in the long-run.

JEL : F10, F13, F14

Keywords

FTA trade trade diversion trade creation gravity model trade liberalization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ADB. (2016). Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/key-indicators-asia-and-pacific-2016

Anderson

J. E.

(1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.

Appleyard

D. R.

Field

A. J.

(2014). International economics. New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited.

Babu

(2012). Indo-Japanese comprehensive economic partnership agreement (CEPA)-a tool of strengthening bilateral trade relations. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 1(3), 23–32.

Batra

(2004). India’s global trade potential: the gravity model approach (ICRIER Working Paper No.151). New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.

Belfiglio

V. J.

(1972). India’s economic & political relations with Bhutan. Asian Survey, 12(8), 676–685.

Bergstrand

(1985). The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–481.

Bergstrand

(1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143–153.

Bhagwati

(2008). Termites in the trading system: How preferential agreements undermine free trade. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

10.

Bhattacharyay

B. N.

Mukhopadhyay

(2013). Economy wide impact of the trade integration between Japan and India: A computable general equilibrium analysis (Working Paper No.4557). Munich: CESifo.

11.

Chaturvedi

(2007). Trade facilitation measures in South Asian FTAs: An overview of initiatives and policy approaches (Working Paper Series No.28). Bangkok: Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade.

12.

Choudhry

Kallummal

Varma

(2013). Trade creation and trade diversion in the India Sri Lanka FTA-a sector specific analysis (Working Paper). New Delhi: Centre for WTO Studies, IIFT.

13.

Choudhury

T. K. R.

(1981). The India-Bhutan relationship: Some new trends. The World Today, 37(12), 476–481.

14.

Chow

G. C.

(1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28(3), 591–605.

15.

Das

R. U.

(2014). India-Japan comprehensive economic partnership agreement (CEPA) some implications for East Asian economic regionalism and RCEP (RIS-DP No. 186). New Delhi: Research and Information System for Developing Countries.

16.

Dasgupta

(2012). India and East Asia: Towards a regional economic integration. Paper presented at the Symposium on the Japan-India Relations in the 21st Century Asia, China and Southeast Asia: Global Changes and Regional Challenges, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp. 42–79. Retrieved from https://www.kkc.or.jp/english/activities/indianscholars/KKC_FINAL_PAPER_PDG_.pdf

17.

Deardorff

A. V.

(1995). Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In Frankel

J. A.

(Ed.), The regionalization of the world economy (pp. 7–28). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

18.

FIEO. (2016). India’s FTAs utilisation rate is only 5–15 per cent: FIEO. The Dollar Business. Retrieved from https://www.thedollarbusiness.com/news/indias-ftas-utilisation-rate-is-only-515-fieo/47093

19.

Fiorentino

R. V.

Verdeja

Toqueboeuf

(2007). The changing landscape of regional trade agreements: 2006 update (Discussion Paper No.12). Geneva: World Trade Organization.

20.

Gaurav

Bharti

(2018). India-Japan CEPA: What RCA index reveals for trade in services? Foreign Trade Review, 53(3), 189–203.

21.

Greenaway

Milner

(2002). Regionalism and gravity (Research Paper 2002/20). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.

22.

Grimwade

Mayes

D. G.

Wang

(2011). Estimating the effects of integration. In Jovanović

M. N.

(Ed.), International handbook on the economics of integration: Factor mobility, agriculture, environment and quantitative studies (pp. 259–284). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

23.

Helpman

(1987). Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 1(1), 62–81.

24.

Helpman

Krugman

P. R.

(1985). Market structure and foreign trade, increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

25.

IMF Factsheet. (2014). The IMF’s trade integration mechanism (TIM). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

26.

International Trade Centre. (2016). Trade map: Trade statistics for international business development. Retrieved from http://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx

27.

Joshi

(2010). An econometric analysis of India-Sri Lanka free trade agreement (Working Paper No.04/2010). Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies.

28.

Kelegama

Karunaratne

(2013). Experiences of Sri Lanka in the Sri Lanka-India FTA and the Sri Lanka-Pakistan FTA (Background Paper No.RVC-10). Geneva: UNCTAD (United Nation Conference on Trade and Development).

29.

Kojima

(2014). The evolution of Japan-India economic relations. In Goto

(Ed.), Rebalance within Asia: the evolution of Japan-India relations (pp. 5–16). Washington, DC: Wilson Center.

30.

Lee

(2013). India-Japan CEPA, prosper than expected. POSRI Chindia Quarterly, 10, 29–35.

31.

Letho

D. K.

Karma

(1994). Indo-Bhutan relations. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs, 7(1), 53–58.

32.

Linnemann

(1966). An econometric study of international trade flows. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

33.

Madaan

D. K.

Singh

(2014). Indo-Bhutan trade: SAFTA and beyond. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 4(8), 20–33.

34.

Martínez-Zarzoso

Nowak-Lehmann

F. D.

(2003). Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur-European Union trade flows. Journal of Applied Economics, 6(2), 291–316.

35.

Milton

Siddique

M. A. B.

(2014). Trade creation and diversion under the Thailand-Australia free trade agreement (TAFTA) (Discussion Paper 14.26). Crawley, WA: University of Western Australia (UWA) Business School.

36.

Moktan

(2009). Evaluating the intra-regional exports and trade creation and trade diversion effects of trade agreements in SAARC countries. South Asia Economic Journal, 9(2), 233–260.

37.

Naidu

A. G.

(1986). Bhutan looks outwards: Its search for identity. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 533–545.

38.

Nataraj

Ashwani . (2014). India-Japan economic partnership agreement: Gains and future prospects. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation.

39.

Panagariya

Findlay

(1994). A political-economy analysis of free trade areas and customs unions (Policy Research Working Paper 1261). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

40.

Plummer

M. G.

Cheong

Hamanaka

(2010). Methodology for impact assessment of free trade agreements. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

41.

Pöyhönen

(1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics, 90(1), 93–100.

42.

The World Bank. (2016). World development indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators

43.

Tinbergen

(1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund.

44.

Urata

Okabe

(2007). The impacts of free trade agreements on trade flows: An application of the gravity model approach (RIETI Discussion Paper Series 07-E-052). Tokyo: Research Institute of Economy, Trade & Industry.

45.

Varma

Gautam

(2016). Comprehensive economic partnership agreement (CEPA) between India and Japan: An analysis of product tariff reduction and consumer welfare of select sectors (Working Paper No.1089). Forum for Research in Empirical International Trade (FREIT). Retrieved from http://www.freit.org/WorkingPapers/Papers/TradePolicyRegional/FREIT1089.pdf

46.

Viner

(1950). The customs union issue. New York, NY: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.