South Asia remains one of the least integrated regions in the world, which is manifested in its lack of connectivity, low levels of intra-regional trade and weak investment flows. On the other hand, there is an apprehension that Southeast and East Asia could fall into a ‘middle income trap’, if they are not able to raise competitive strength and productivity further. In view of this, it is argued that there is a need for a framework of second-generation cooperation and integration embracing these three subregions in Southern Asia. This calls for concerted efforts to leverage existing institutional arrangements and put in place new avenues of subregional and inter-regional cooperation. Expansion of production networks, developments of value chains and greater integration of markets will allow these subregions to translate their respective comparative advantages into competitive advantages. Through harnessing opportunities of technology transfer, connectivity and greater factor mobility, and by taking advantage of cross-regional division of labour, these subregions could promote new patterns of inter-regional trade structure and specialization, which could benefit all the countries of Southern Asia.
BernardM.RavenhillJ. (1995). Beyond product cycles and flying geese: Regionalization, hierarchy, and the industrialization of East Asia. World Politics, 47(January), 171–179.
6.
ChangH.J. (2006). The East Asian development experience: The miracle, the crisis and the future. London and New York: Zed Books Ltd.
7.
DeP. (2009). Trade transportation costs in South Asia: An empirical investigation. In BrooksD.H.HummelsD. (Eds), Infrastructure’s role in lowering Asia’s trade costs: Building for trade (pp. 230–259). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: ADBI and Edward Elgar Publishing.
8.
DeP. (2014a). India’s emerging connectivity with Southeast Asia: Progress and prospects. ADBI Working Paper Series 507, ADB Institute.
9.
DeP. (2014b). Strengthening regional trade and production networks through transport connectivity in South and South-West Asia. Development Papers 1401, UN ESCAP, Delhi.
ErnstD.KimL. (2001). Global production networks, knowledge diffusion and local capability formation. East-West Center Working Papers No. 19, the US.
12.
FrançoisJ.RanaP.WignarajaG. (2009). Introduction and overview. In FrançoisJ.RanaP.WignarajaG. (Eds), Pan-Asian integration: Linking East and South Asia (pp. 1–62). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
FukasakuK.KimuraF. (2001, May). Globalisation and intra-firm trade: Further evidence. Mimeo.
14.
GaulierG.LemoineF.Ünal-KesenciD. (2004). China’s integration in Asian production networks and its implications. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, Draft.
15.
GuerrieriP. (2000). International competitiveness, regional integration, and corporate strategies in the East Asian electronic industry. In BorrusM.ErnstD.HaggardS. (Eds), International production networks in Asia: Rivalry or riches (pp. 30–55). London and New York: Routledge.
16.
HaddadM. (2007). Trade integration in East Asia: The role of China and production networks (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4160). Washington, DC: World Bank.
17.
HanouzM.D.GeigerT.HerreraT. (2010). Enabling trade in the greater ASEAN region: Findings from the enabling trade index. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
18.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2013). Global wage report 2012/13: Wages and equitable growth. Geneva: ILO.
JainR.SinghJ.B. (2009). Trade patterns in SAARC countries: Emerging trends and issues. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 30(3), 73–111.
21.
Japan International Freight Forwarders Association (JIFFA). (2012). ASEAN logistics survey report, 5. Tokyo: JIFFA.
22.
JonesG.W. (2008). Underlying factors in international labour migration in Asia: Population, employment and productivity trends. Working Paper No. 1, International Labour Organization, Bangkok.
23.
KelegamaS. (2012). Changing face: The trials and fortunes of regional cooperation in South Asia. In KelegamaS.AdhikariR.SharmaP.KharelP. (Eds), Regional economic integration: Challenges for South Asia during turbulent times (pp. 19–35). Kathmandu: SAWTEE and SACEPS.
24.
KwarkN-S.ShynY-S. (2006). International R&D spillovers revisited: Human capital as an absorptive capacity for foreign technology. International Economic Journal, 20(2), 179–196.
25.
LewisE. (2005). Immigration, skill mix, and the choice of technique. Working Paper No. 05-8, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
26.
MartincusC.CaraballoJ.GrazianoA. (2013). Customs as doorkeepers: What are their effects on international trade? Working Paper, United States International Trade Commission.
27.
MattooA.NeaguI.C.OzdenC. (2005). Brain waste?: Educated immigrants in the U.S. labor market. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
28.
MøenJ. (2005). Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers?Journal of Labor Economics, 23(1), 81–114.
29.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Trade facilitation indicators: The potential impact of trade facilitation on developing countries’ trade. Trade Policy Paper 144, OECD.
30.
PohitS.BasuS. (2012). High technology merchandise exports: Where does India stand?South Asian Economic Journal, 12(2), 183–206.
31.
RahmanM.AkhterK. (2014). Trade facilitation towards export promotion in the Indian market: Addressing the emerging gaps. CPD Research Monograph 8. Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue.
32.
RahmanM.MoazzemK.G.ChowdhuryM.I.SehrinF. (2014). Connecting South Asia and Southeast Asia: A Bangladesh country study. ADBI Working Paper Series, 500, Tokyo: ADB Institute.
33.
RathaD.ShawW. (2007). South–south migration and remittances (World Bank Working Paper No.102). Washington, DC: World Bank.
34.
SaxenianA.L. (2001). Transnational communities and the evolution of production networks: The cases of Taiwan, China and India. East-West Center Working Papers, 31, USA.
35.
SchwabK. (Ed.). (2013). The global competitiveness report 2013–2014. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
SobhanR. (2000). Rediscovering the southern silk route—Integrating Asia’s transport infrastructure. Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) and the University Press Limited (UPL).
WignarajaG. (2014). Will South Asia benefit from pan-Asian integration?South Asia Economic Journal, 15(2), 175–197.
42.
World Bank
. (2013). Doing business 2014: Understanding regulations for small and medium-size enterprises. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
43.
YunusM. (2013). Economic gains from developing functional transit facilities in Bangladesh. Paper presented at UN ESCAP’s ARTNeT Conference, Macao, China.
44.
YunusM. (2014). Gains for Bangladesh from BCIM connectivity. Report prepared for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bangladesh.
45.
ZawM.KudoT. (2011). A study on economic corridors and industrial zones, ports and metropolitan and alternative roads in Myanmar. In IshidaM. (Ed.), Intra- and inter-city connectivity in the Mekong region (pp. 241–287), BRC Research Report 6. Thailand: Institute of Developing Economies–Japan External Trade Organization.
