The case for a universal basic income helps to reflect on what could be done to bring social protection into the 21st century, but, it is argued, does not itself provide the most convincing solution to the difficulties rightly pointed out by its proponents. However, this plea constitutes a fruitful source of inspiration for other developments than that proposed. Three proposals are made here in this respect: reducing the influence of household composition on the amount of social benefits received, making the possibility of combining a social benefit with other financial resources more flexible, and relaxing the work integration requirements imposed in return for the granting of rights.
AlalufM (2014) L’allocation universelle. Nouveau label de précarité. Charleroi: Couleur Livres.
2.
AlalufMZamora VargasD(eds) (2016) Contre l’allocation universelle. Montréal: Lux.
3.
AlstonP (2019) Universal basic income as a social rights-based antidote to growing economic insecurity. In: YoungK (ed) The Future of Economic and Social Rights, foreword by A. Sen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.377–403.
4.
ApelKO (1992) Normatively grounding 'critical theory' through recourse to the lifeworld? A transcendental-pragmatic attempt to think with Habermas against Habermas. In: HonnethAMcCarthyTOffeC, et al (eds) Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, pp.125–170.
5.
ArnspergerCJohnsonWA (2011) The guaranteed income as an equal-opportunity tool in the transition toward sustainability. In: GosseriesAVanderborghtY (eds) Arguing About Justice. Essays for Philippe Van Parijs. Louvain-la-Neuve : Presses universitaires de Louvain, pp.61–69.
6.
BecC (2014) La Sécurité sociale. Une institution de la démocratie. Paris: Gallimard.
7.
BergmannB (2008) Basic income grants or the welfare state: Which better promotes gender equality?Basic Income Studies.3(3): article 5.
8.
BonvinJMMoachonE (2013) Droit au travail et responsabilité individuelle dans les États sociaux contemporains. Une analyse en termes de capabilités des politiques d’activation des personnes sans emploi. Journal européen des droits de l’homme/European Journal of Human Rights.1(5): 777–803.
9.
BonvinJMRosensteinE (2015) Contractualising social policies: a way towards more active social citizenship and enhanced capabilities? In: ErvikRKildalNNilssenE (eds) New Contractualism in European Welfare Policies. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp.47–77.
10.
BourgDArnspergerC (2017) Promouvoir l’expérimentation économique : pour un revenu de transition écologique. In: SinaïASzubaM (eds) Gouverner la décroissance. Politiques de l'anthropocène III. Paris: Presses de SciencesPo, pp.47–76.
11.
BrowneJImmervollH (2017) Mechanics of replacing benefit systems with a basic income: Comparative results from a microsimulation approach. Journal of Economic Inequality.15(4): 325–344.
CastelR (2017) André Gorz et le travail: une interprétation critique. In: FourelCCailléA (eds) Le Moment Gorz. Lormont: Le bord de l’eau, pp.185–197.
14.
Civitarese MatteucciSRepettoG (2021) The expressive function of human dignity: A pragmatic approach to social rights claims. European Journal of Social Security23(2): 120–143.
15.
DermineEDumontD (2022) A renewed critical perspective on social law: Disentangling its ambivalent relationship with productivism. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations.38(3): 237–268.
16.
De WispelaereJStirtonL (2011) The administrative efficiency of basic income. Policy & Politics39(1): 115–132.
17.
De WispelaereJStirtonL (2012) A disarmingly simple idea? Practical bottlenecks in the implementation of a universal basic income. International Social Security Review.65(2): 103–121.
18.
DuboisHLudwinekA (2015) Access to Social Benefits: Reducing Non Take-up, Eurofound Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
19.
DumontD (2021) Le revenu de base universel, avenir de la sécurité sociale? Une introduction critique au débat, foreword by O. De Schutter. Brussels: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
20.
EleveldE (2018) Bijstand met rechten en plichten of een basisinkomen(bijstand)? In: EleveldE (ed) De Participatiewet. Een grondrechtenperspectief. Deventer: Kluwer, pp.231–242.
21.
EleveldEKampenTArtsJ(eds) (2020) Welfare to Work in Contemporary European Welfare States. Legal, Sociological and Philosophical Perspectives on Justice and Domination. Bristol: Policy Press.
22.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23.
EydouxA (2018) Revenu pour tous et toutes: un universel sexué. In: AllègreG (ed) Pour ou contre le revenu universel?Paris: Presses universitaires de France, pp.53–73.
24.
FriedmanM, with the assistance of Friedman R (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
GoedeméTPenneTHufkensT, et al. (2019) What does it mean to live on the poverty threshold? Lessons from reference budgets. In: CantillonBGoedeméTHillsJ (eds) Decent Incomes for All. Improving Policies in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.13–33.
26.
GorzA (1992) On the difference between society and community, and why basic income cannot by itself confer full membership of either. In: Van ParijsP (ed) Arguing for Basic Income. Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform. London: Verso, pp.178–184.
27.
GorzA (1994) Revenu minimum et citoyenneté. Droit au travail vs droit au revenu. Futuribles.184: 49–60.
28.
GorzA (1999) Reclaiming Work. Beyond the Wage-based Society[1997], translated by C. Turner. Cambridge: Polity Press.
29.
GugushviliDLaenenT (2021) Two decades after Korpi and Palme’s ‘paradox of redistribution’: What have we learned so far and where do we take it from here?Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy.37(2): 112–127.
30.
GugushviliDvan OorschotW (2020) Popular preferences for a fully means-tested welfare provision model: Social and cross-national divides in Europe. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.40(11–12): 1455–1472.
31.
HandlerJBabcockA (2006) The failure of workfare: Another reason for a basic income guarantee. Basic Income Studies.1(1): article 3.
32.
HarrisN (2008) Simplification of social security: The international experience. Journal of Social Security Law.15(1): 12–31.
33.
HarrisN (2013) Law in a Complex State. Complexity in the Law and Structure of Welfare. Oxford-Portland: Hart.
34.
HarrisN (2015) Complexity in the law and administration of social security: Is it really a problem?Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law.37(2): 209–227.
35.
HernanzVMalherbetFPellizzariM (2004) Take-up of welfare benefits in OECD countries: a review of the evidence. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers nr 17. Paris: OECD.
36.
JacquesONoëlA (2018) The case for welfare state universalism, or the lasting relevance of the paradox of redistribution. Journal of European Social Policy.28(1): 70–85.
37.
JacquesONoëlA (2021) Targeting within universalism. Journal of European Social Policy.31(1): 15–29.
38.
JägerAZamora VargasD (2023) Welfare for Markets: A Global History of Basic Income. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
39.
JanssensJVan MechelenN (2022) To take or not to take? An overview of the factors contributing to the non take-up of public provisions. European Journal of Social Security.24(2): 95–116.
40.
JordanBJamesSKayH, et al. (1992) Trapped in Poverty? Labour-Market Decisions in Low-Income Households. London: Routledge.
41.
KallisG (2011) In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics.70(5): 873–880.
42.
KorpiWPalmeJ (1998) The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. American Sociological Review.63(5): 661–687.
43.
LaforeR (2017) Le revenu de base et la protection sociale: Sortir de l’ambiguïté. Droit social.4: 314–320.
44.
MarchalSMarxI (2018) Stemming the tide: What have the European Union countries done to support low-wage workers in an era of downward wage pressures?Journal of European Social Policy.28(1): 18–33.
45.
MartinP (2020) Le revenu universel à nouveau: De quoi parle-t-on?Droit social.10: 770–774.
46.
MartinelliLVanderborghtY (2022) Basic income and the social investment state: Towards mutual reinforcement?European Journal of Social Security.24(1): 40–57.
47.
McKeeverGWalshT (2020) The moral hazard of conditionality: Restoring the integrity of social security law. Australian Journal of Social Issues.55(1): 73–87.
48.
MurrayC (2008) Guaranteed income as a replacement for the welfare state. Basic Income Studies.3(2): article 6.
49.
OrloffA (2013) Why basic income does not promote gender equality [1990]. In: WiderquistKNogueraJAVanderborghtYDe WispelaereJ (eds) Basic Income. An Anthology of Contemporary Research. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.149–152.
50.
PalierB (2019) Work, social protection and the middle classes: What future in the digital age?International Social Security Review.72(3): 113–133.
51.
PenneTCornelisIStormsB (2020) All we need is… Reference budgets as an EU policy indicator to assess the adequacy of minimum income protection. Social Indicators Research.147(3): 991–1013.
52.
PietersD (2006) Social Security: An Introduction to the Basic Principles, 2nd revised edition,Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
53.
RomanD (2014) Les aides aux parents isolés: l’aide sociale au prisme d’une lecture féministe du droit. In: Hennette-VauchezSPichardPRomanD (eds) La loi et le genre. Études critiques de droit français. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp.321–338.
54.
RuedaD (2015) The state of the welfare state: Unemployment, labour market policy, and inequality in the age of workfare. Comparative Politics.47(3): 296–314.
55.
SilveraR (2018) Le revenu universel: Quels risques pour les femmes?Travail, genre et sociétés40: 163–168.
56.
SkocpolT (1990) Sustainable social policy: Fighting poverty without poverty programs. The American Prospect.1(2): 59–67.
57.
SlomanPZamora VargasDRamos PintoP(eds) (2021) Universal Basic Income in Historical Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
StandingG (2012) Why a basic income is necessary for a right to work. Basic Income Studies.7(2): 19–40.
59.
StevensYWerbrouckJ (2019) Basic income and social security: A structural problem?Revue Belge de Sécurité Sociale.61(1): 185–196.
60.
TorryM (2020) A Modern Guide to Citizen’s Basic Income. A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
61.
van BerkelR (2020) Making welfare conditional: A street-level perspective. Social Policy & Administration.54(2): 191–204.
62.
VandammePE (2021) Trois modèles de revenu de base. Raisons politiques.83: 17–29.
63.
VandelannooteDVerbistG (2020) The impact of in-work benefits on work incentives and poverty in four European countries. Journal of European Social Policy.30(2): 144–157.
64.
VanderborghtY (2014) The tensions of welfare state reform and the potential of a universal basic income. In: DermineEDumontD (eds) Activation Policies for the Unemployed, the Right to Work and the Duty to Work. Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang, pp.209–222.
65.
Van LanckerW (2020) There’s a crack in everything. Universalism, targeting and the ‘Matthew effect’ in modern welfare states. IPPR Progressive Review27(1): 18–27.
66.
Van LanckerWGhyselsJCantillonB (2015) The impact of child benefits on single mother poverty: Exploring the role of targeting in 15 European countries. International Journal of Social Welfare.24(3): 210–222.
67.
Van LanckerWVan MechelenN (2015) Universalism under siege? Exploring the association between targeting, child benefits and child poverty across 26 countries. Social Science Research.50: 60–75.
68.
van OorschotW (2002) Targeting welfare: on the functions and dysfunctions of means-testing in social policy. In: TownsendPGordonD (eds) World Poverty: New Policies to Defeat an Old Enemy. Bristol: Policy Press, pp.171–193.
69.
van OorschotWRoosmaF (2017) The social legitimacy of targeted welfare and welfare deservingness. In: van OorschotWRoosmaFMeulemanBReeskensT (eds) The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare. Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.3–33.
70.
Van ParijsP (1991) Why surfers should be fed: The liberal case for an unconditional basic income. Philosophy and Public Affairs.20(2): 101–131.
71.
Van ParijsP, with the assistance of Genet, M (1994) Allocation universelle et plein emploi: L’inéluctable alliance. Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique.33(1–2): 121–134.
72.
Van ParijsP (2004) De la trappe au socle: l’allocation universelle contre le chômage. In: SupiotA (ed) Tisser le lien social. Paris: Maison des sciences de l’homme, pp.239–252.
73.
Van ParijsPVanderborghtY (2005) L’allocation universelle. Paris: La Découverte.
74.
Van ParijsPVanderborghtY (2017) Basic Income. A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
75.
Van ParijsPVanderborghtY (2019) Ethically justifiable, economically sustainable, politically achievable? A response to van der Veen & Groot, Rogers, and Noguera. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal.40(2): 247–261.
76.
VonkG (2014) Repressive welfare states: The spiral of obligations and sanctions in social security. European Journal of Social Security.16(3): 188–203.
77.
WhiteS (2017) Should a minimum income be unconditional? In: Civitarese MatteucciSHallidayS (eds) Social Rights in Europe in an Age of Austerity. London: Routledge, pp.181–196.
78.
WiderquistKNogueraJAVanderborghtY, et al. (eds) (2013) Basic Income. An Anthology of Contemporary Research. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
79.
ZamboniM (2021) Basic income in the Swedish legislative debate: The forbidden topic. European Journal of Social Security.23(4): 341–359.
Zamora VargasD (2023) ‘Welfare without the welfare state’: Milton Friedman’s negative income tax and the monetization of poverty. Modern Intellectual History.20(2), forthcoming.
