Most previous research on social welfare has focused on the statutory part of welfare delivery. By examining collectively-negotiated sickness benefits, this article introduces occupational welfare into cross-national analyses of social policy and explores how this changes the Nordic welfare model. Instead of limiting its focus to one average worker wage, the article examines five different occupations representing both low-skilled and high-skilled workers, as well as public and private sector employees. Using the stylised case method and examining three different durations of sickness, the study shows that employees in different occupations have different rights in relation to occupational benefits during sickness. Although the results found by the analysis vary with length of sickness, the article concludes that, in general, occupational welfare has a reinforcing effect on the existing differences between occupations generated by public benefits. The analysis presents evidence of not-so-equal aspects of the Nordic welfare model.
AdemaW. (1999) Net Social Expenditure. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 39, Paris, OECD publishing.
2.
BislevS.LindqvistR. (1990) ‘Sick-leave Regimes: The Private-Public Mix in Sickness Provision’, International Journal of Sociology, 20(4), 48–77.
3.
BradleyD.HuberE.MollerS.NielsenF.StephensJ.D. (2003) ‘Distribution and Redistribution in Post-industrial Democracies’, World Politics, 55(2), 193–228.
4.
CastlesF.G. (1989) ‘Social Protection by other Means: Australia's Strategy of Coping with External Vulnerability’, in CastlesF.G. (ed.) The Comparative History of Public Policy, Cambridge, Polity Press.
5.
CutlerT.WaineB. (2001) ‘Social Insecurity and the Retreat from Social Democracy: Occupational Welfare in the Long Boom and Financialisation’, Review of International Political Economy, 8(1), 96–118.
6.
EbbinghausB. (2010) ‘Unions and employers’, in CastlesF.LeibfriedS.LewisJ.ObingerH.PiersonC. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
7.
EbbinghausB. (2011) The Varieties of Pension Governance Pension Privatisation in Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
8.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity Press.
9.
Esping-AndersenG. (1992) ‘The Three Political Economies of the Welfare State’, in KolbergJ.E. (eds.) The Study of Welfare State Regimes, New York and London, M.E. Sharpe.
10.
Esping-AndersenG.KorpiW. (1987) ‘From Poor Relief to Institutional Welfare States: The Development of Scandinavian Social Policy’, in EriksonR.HansenE.J.RingenS.UusitaloH. (eds.) The Scandinavian Model; Welfare States and Welfare Research, New York and London, M.E. Sharpe.
11.
European Commission (2011) Industrial Relations in Europe 2010, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
12.
ForssellA.MedelbergM.StahlbergA-C. (1999) ‘Unequal Public Transfers to the Elderly in Different Countries - Equal Disposable Incomes’, European Journal of Social Security, 1(1), 63–89.
13.
FarnsworthK. (2004) ‘Welfare through Work: An Audit of Occupational Social Provision at the Turn of the New Century’, Social Policy and Administration, 38(5), 437–455.
14.
GreveB. (2007) Occupational Welfare, Cheltenham, Northampton, Edward Elgar.
15.
GreveB. (2008) ‘What is Welfare?’, Central European Journal of Public Policy, 2(1), 50–73.
16.
JärviL.KuivalainenS. (2012) ‘Does Occupational Welfare Matter? Measurement and the Importance of Collectively Negotiated Sickness Benefits in Cross-National Social Policy Analyses: Case of the Nordic Countries’, unpublished paper presented at the 10th Annual ESPAnet conference in Edinburgh.
17.
KangasO. (1991) ‘The Politics of Social Rights. Studies on the Dimensions of Sickness Insurance in OECD Countries’, Stockholm, Swedish Institute for Social Research.
18.
KangasO. (2010) ‘Work Accident and Sickness Benefits’, in CastlesF.LeibfriedS.LewisJ.ObingerH.PiersonC. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
19.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (2007) The Social Citizenship Indicator Program (SCIP), Stockholm, Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.
20.
KuhnleS. (1981) ‘The Growth of Social Insurance Programs in Scandinavia: Outside Influences and Internal Forces’, in FloraP.HeidenheimerA.J. (eds.) The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
21.
KvistJ. (1997) ‘Retrenchment or Restructuring? The Emergence of a Multi-tiered Welfare State in Denmark’, in ClasenJ. (ed.) Social Insurance in Europe, Bristol: The Policy Press.
22.
MarshallT. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
23.
NOSOSCO (2011) ‘Social Protection in the Nordic Countries 2009/2010, Scope, Expenditure and Financing’, Copenhagen: Nordic Social Statistical Committee.
24.
OECD (2005) ‘Taxing wages 2003 – 2004, Special Feature: Broadening the Definition of the Average Worker’, Paris, OECD.
25.
ReinM. (1982) ‘The Social Policy of the Firm’, Policy Sciences, 14(2), 117–135.
26.
ReinM. (1996) ‘Is America Exceptional? The Role of Occupational Welfare in the United States and the European Community’, in ShalevM. (ed.) The Privatisation of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan, Basingstoke and New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
ReinM.WadensjöE. (1997) Enterprise and the Welfare State, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
28.
ScruggsL. (2004) Database: Comparative Welfare Entitlements Data Set 1960–2002. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, Department of Political Science, available at http://sp.uconn.edu/-scruggs/.
29.
ShalevM., (1996) The Privatisation of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan, Basingstoke and New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
LindquistG. SjögrenWadensjöE. (2006) ‘National Social Insurance - Not the Whole Picture’, Report for ESS 2006:5, Stockholm, Regeringskansliet.
TitmussR. (1958) Essays on the Welfare State, London, Allen and Unwin.
34.
ToivonenL. (2012) Statutory and Occupational Sickness Benefits in Finland in 2011, Kela, online working papers 34/2012, available at http://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/29614.
35.
TrampuschC. (2007) ‘Industrial Relations as a Source of Social Policy: A Typology of Institutional Conditions for Industrial Agreements on Social Benefits’, Social Policy and Administration, 41(3), 251–270.
36.
van GervenM. (2008) The Broad Tracks of Path Dependent Benefit Reforms, Helsinki, Kela.
37.
WilenskyH. (1975) The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditure, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
38.
YerkesM.TijdensK. (2010) ‘Social Risk Protection in Collective Agreements: Evidence from Netherlands’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 16(4), 369–383.
