Examining the generosity of welfare states and individual benefit schemes is a classical task in comparative welfare state studies. Three types of welfare states can be discerned based, in part, on their level of benefit generosity. Although significant advances have been made in the development of measures of welfare state generosity, this progress has not been without its challenges and limitations. In this article, the authors examine two sets of limitations related to measurement validity in comparative welfare state research: securing content validation and ensuring comparability across time and place. Through the use of illustrative examples to compare the situation of the unemployed in five European countries across several income levels and two family types, we demonstrate that, by profiling and stacking public benefits using the OECD Tax-Benefit micro-simulation model, we are able to carry out a more informed analysis of the redistributive strategies of the welfare state.
AdcockR.CollierD. (2001) ‘Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research’, American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.
2.
AdemaW.FronP.LadaiqueM. (2011) ‘Is the European Welfare State Really More Expensive? Indicators on Social Spending, 1980–2012; and a Manual to the OECD Social Expenditure Database (SOCX)’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 124, Paris: OECD Publishing.
3.
BonoliG. (1997) ‘Classifying Welfare States: A Two-dimension Approach’, Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351–72.
4.
BradshawJ.FinchN. (2002) ‘A Comparison of Child Benefit Packages in 22 Countries’Department for Work and Pensions Research Report, No 174, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
5.
BradshawJ.MayhewE. (2006) ‘Family Benefit Packages’ in BradshawJ.HatlandA. (eds.) Social Policy, Employment and Family Change in Comparative Perspective, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
6.
BradshawJ.RichardsonD. (2009) ‘An Index of Child Well-Being in Europe’, Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 319–351.
7.
BradshawJ.RichardsonD.RitakallioV.M. (2007) ‘Child Poverty and Child Well-Being in Europe’, Journal of Children's Services, 2(1), 18–36.
8.
CaminadaC.L.J.GoudswaardK.P. (2005) ‘Are Public and Private Social Expenditures Complementary?’, International Advances in Economic Research, 11(2), 175–189.
9.
CarrollE. (1999) Emergence and Structuring of Social Insurance Institutions: Comparative Studies on Social Policy and Unemployment Insurance, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
10.
CastlesF.G. (2002) ‘Developing New Measures of Welfare State Change and Reform’, European Journal of Political Research, 41(5), 613–641.
11.
CastlesF.G. (2008) ‘What Welfare States Do: A Disaggregated Expenditure Approach’, Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 45–62.
12.
CastlesF.G.MitchellD. (1993) ‘Worlds of Welfare and Families of Nations’, in CastlesF.G. (ed.) Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company.
13.
CastlesF.G.ObingerH. (2007) ‘Social Expenditure and the Politics of Redistribution’, Journal of European Social Policy, 17(3), 206–222.
14.
DanforthB.StephensJ.D. (2013) ‘Measuring Social Citizenship: Achievements and Future Challenges’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20(9), 1285–1298.
15.
DekenJ.D.KittelB. (2007) ‘Social Expenditure Under Scrutiny: The Problems of Using Aggregate Spending Data for Assessing Welfare State Dynamics’, in ClasenJ.SiegelN.A. (eds.) Investigating Welfare State Change: The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
16.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17.
Esping-AndersenG. (1999) Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
FerrariniT. (2003) Parental Leave Institutions in Eighteen Post-war Welfare States, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
19.
FerrariniT.NelsonK.KorpiW.PalmeJ. (2013) ‘Social Citizenship Rights and Social Insurance Replacement Rate Validity: Pitfalls and Possibilities’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20(9), 1251–1266.
20.
FerreraM. (1996) ‘The “Southern” Model of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.
21.
FreundtA.StraubingerS.G.KvistJ. (2013) ‘Modernising Social Security for Lone Parents: Avoiding Fertility and Unemployment Traps when Reforming Social Policy in Europe’, in RamiaG.FarnsworthK.IrvingZ. (eds.) Social Policy Review 25: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, Bristol: The Policy Press.
22.
GuptaN.D.OaxacaR.L.SmithN. (2006) ‘Swimming Upstream, Floating Downstream: Comparing Women's Relative Wage Progress in the United States and Denmark’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 59(2), 243–266.
23.
KangasO. (1991) The Politics of Social Rights: Studies on the dimensions of sickness insurance in OECD countries, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
24.
KangasO. (1994) ‘The Politics of Social Security: On Regressions, Equality Comparisons and Cluster Analysis’, in JanoskiT.HicksA. (eds.) The Comparative Political Economic of the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
KauttoM. (2002) ‘Investing in Services in West European Welfare States’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12(1), 53–65.
26.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries’, American Sociological Review, 63(5), 661–87.
27.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (2004) ‘Robin Hood, St Matthew, or simple egalitarianism? Strategies of equality in welfare states’, in KennettP. (ed.) A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
28.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (2007) The Social Citizenship Dataset (SCIP), Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.
29.
KvistJ. (2007) ‘Fuzzy Set Ideal Type Analysis’, Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 474–481.
30.
KvistJ. (2011) ‘One-Size-Fits-All? Measurement issues in Medium-N comparative welfare state analysis’, Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Fall, 20–25.
31.
MontanariI. (2000) Social Citizenship and Work in Welfare States: Comparative Studies on Convergence and on Gender, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
32.
NelsonK. (2003) Fighting Poverty: Comparative studies on social insurance, means-tested benefits and income redistribution, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
33.
NelsonK. (2010) ‘Social Assistance and Minimum Income Benefits in Old and New EU Democracies’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(4), 367–378.
34.
OECD (2007) Benefits and Wages, Paris: OECD Publishing.
PalmeJ. (1990) Pension Rights in Welfare Capitalism. The development of old-age pensions in 18 OECD countries, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
38.
PitzurelloS. (1999) De-commodification and the Worlds of Welfare Capitalism: A cluster analysis, Florence: European University Institute.
39.
ScruggsL. (2004) Welfare State Entitlements Dataset: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Eighteen Welfare States, Version 1.1.
40.
ScruggsL. (2006) ‘The Generosity of Social Insurance, 1971–2002’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(3), 349–364.
41.
ScruggsL. (2013) ‘Measuring and Validating Social Program Replacement Rates’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20(9), 1267–1284.
42.
SiaroffA. (1994) ‘Work, Welfare and Gender Equality: A New Typology’, in SainsburyD. (ed.) Gendering Welfare States, London: Sage.
43.
SjöbergO. (2000) Duties in the Welfare State. Working and Paying for Social Rights, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
44.
WennemoI. (1994) Sharing the Costs of Children. Studies on the Development of Family Support in the OECD Countries, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
45.
WenzelburgerG.ZohlnhöferR.WoldF. (2013) ‘Implications of Dataset Choice in Comparative Welfare State Research’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20(9), 1229–1250.
