The Flip Side of the Coin: The Consequences of the European Budgetary Projections on the Adequacy of Social Security Pensions

Abstract

The Ageing Working Group (AWG) assesses the long-term sustainability of public finances by presenting a set of public expenditure projections for all Member States, including projections on pensions. These projections are based on demographic forecasts and agreed assumptions on key economic variables. The adequacy and sustainability of pensions are, however, two sides of the same coin and a full assessment of pensions therefore requires integration. This paper applies the dynamic micro-simulation model MIDAS to assess the consequences of the AWG projections and assumptions on the future adequacy of public pensions in Belgium, Germany and Italy.

A comparison of the simulation results suggests that the impact of the parametric pension reform in Belgium and Germany and the systemic reform in Italy on (re) distribution and the risk of low-income go in the same direction, but that the magnitudes differ. Indeed, the impact is stronger in Italy than in Belgium and Germany. In the latter especially, important changes safeguarding the sustainability of the pension system seem to have had a relatively small impact on the risk of low-income among pension benefit recipients in particular.

Keywords

adequacy AWG Belgium Germany Italy pensions micro-simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

and Prus

(2006) ‘Income Inequality over the later-life course: A comparative analysis of seven OECD countries’, SEDAP Research Paper No. 154, June.

Buslei

and Steiner

(2006) ‘Aufkommens- und Verteilungsef-fekte der Besteuerung von Alterseinkünften – Eine Mikrosimulationsanalyse für Deutschland’, in Seidl

and Jickeli

(eds.), Steuern und soziale Sicherung in Deutschland, Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag, 57–85.

Dekkers

Buslei

Cozzolino

Desmet

Geyer

Hofmann

Raitano

Steiner

Tanda

Tedeschi

and Verschueren

(2009a) ‘What are the consequences of the European AWG-projections on the adequacy of pensions? An application of the dynamic micro simulation model MIDAS for Belgium, Germany and Italy’, ENEPRI Research Report No 65, AIM WP4, available at http://shop.ceps.eu/BookDetail.php?item_id=1780.

Dekkers

Buslei

Cozzolino

Desmet

Geyer

Hofmann

Raitano

Steiner

Tanda

Tedeschi

and Verschueren

(2009b) ‘So pensions in Europe will remain sustainable. But will they remain adequate? An assessment of the consequences of the AWG-projections on the adequacy of social security pensions in Belgium, Italy and Germany’. Paper presented at the 2^nd General Conference of the International Micro-simulation Association, “Microsimulation: Bridging Data and Policy”, Ottawa, Canada, June 8–10, 2009, available at www.microsimulation.org.

Doutrelepont

Mortelmans

and Casman

M-T.

(eds.) (2004) Onze ans de vie en Belgique: Analyses socio-écomomiques à partir due Panel Démographie Familiale, Gent, Academia Press.

European Commission EC (2005) ‘The Budgetary Projection exercise of DG ECFIN and the Ageing Working Group: Detailed description of agreed underlying assumptions and of projection methodologies, Note for the attention of the Ageing working Group’, ECFIN, REP/E3/NDG/53678, Brussels, 10 August.

European Commission EC (2006) ‘The impact of ageing on public expenditure: Projections for the EU-25 Member States on pensions, health care, long-term care, education and unemployment transfers’, European Economy Special Report, n. 1/2006, Brussels.

European Commission EC (2007) ‘Pension Schemes and Projection Models in EU-25 Member States’, European Economy occasional papers, 35, November 2007, Brussels, Economic Policy Committee and Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

European Commission EC (2009a) website of the Working Group on Ageing Populations and Sustainability, available at http://europa.eu/epc/working_groups/ageing_en.htm.

10.

European Commission EC (2009b) website of the Social Protection Committee and the Indicators Subgroup, available at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=758&langId=en.

11.

Fasquelle

Festjens

M.-J.

and Scholtus

(2008) ‘Welvaartsbinding van de sociale zekerheidsuitkeringen: Een overzicht van de recente ontwikkelingen’, Working paper 8–08, Brussels, Federal Planning Bureau.

12.

Federal Planning Bureau FPB (2006) ‘Country Fiche. Projections 2004–2050 for Belgium on pensions, health care, long-term care, unemployment and education public expenditures in the AWG scenarios’. Brussels, February.

13.

Franco

and Sartor

, (2006) ‘NDC's in Italy: Unsatisfactory present, uncertain future’, in Holzmann

and Palmer

(eds.), Pension Reform – Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes. Washington, World Bank.

14.

Gronchi

and Aprile

(1998) ‘The 1995 Pension Reform: Equity, Sustainability and Indexation’, Labour, 12(1), 67–100.

15.

Istituto nazionale di statistica ISTAt (2002) ‘Panel Europeo sulle Famiglie (a cura die Claudio Pauselli)’, Method e Norme, 15.

16.

Lusardi

Fornero

and Monticone

(2008) ‘Adequacy of Saving for Old-age’, paper presented at the Annual Conference “Financial Security in Retirement”, Collegio Carlo Alberto, Moncalieri (Turin), 18–19 September.

17.

Scholtus

(2008) ‘Coût budgétaire et effet sur la pension moyenne des mesures récentes dans le régime des travailleurs independants – Une analyse réalisée par une version adaptée de MoSES’, Working Paper 07–08, Brussels, Federal Planning Bureau.

18.

Wagner

Frick

and Schupp

(2007) ‘The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) – Scope, Evolution and Enhancement’, in Schmollers Jahrbuch, Journal of Applied Social Studies, 127(1), 139–169.

19.

Zaidi

Marin

and Fuchs

(2006) ‘Pension Policy in EU25 and its possible impact on Elderly Poverty’, Second Report, Vienna, European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, 10 July.

20.

Zaidi

, and Grech

A. G.

(2007) ‘Pension Policy in EU25 and its impact on pension benefits’, Benefits, 15(3), 299–311.