This article discusses some recent trends in the area of immigration and social security. Access to social security is rendered more difficult, particularly for irregular immigrants, while the scope of application of the social security system is more closely linked to the national border (retrenchment to the national borders). It is argued that these trends can be attributed to restrictive immigration policies and the implicit rejection of transnational citizenship. These factors also appear to affect the strength of the transnational informal social security networks of which migrant groups are members. The article calls for an alternative strategy for the social protection of irregular migrants based upon respect for human rights, extra-territorial responsibility of migrants and more socially inspired return policies.
Adviescommissie voor Vreemdelingenzaken (ACVZ) (2012) Recht op een menswaardig bestaan. Advies over opvang en bijstand voor niet rechtmatig verblijvende vreemdelingen en rechtmatig verblijvende vreemdelingen zonder recht op voorzieningen, Den Haag, ACVZ.
2.
AnonuevoA.T.Dizon-AnonuevoE.M.GonzalesE., (2008) Coming Home. Migration and Reintegration Reference Materials, San Pablo City, Laguna.
3.
BankR. (2000) ‘Europeanising the reception of asylum seekers: The opposite of welfare state policies’, in BommesM.GeddesA. (eds.), Immigration and welfare, challenging the borders of the welfare state, London, Routledge.
4.
BashiF. (2007) Survival of the Knitted. Immigrant Social Networks in a Stratified World, Stanford, CA., Stanford University Press.
5.
BeltmanD. (2012) ‘Voluntary return facilities for aliens without residence permits in comparative perspective’ in VonkG.J. (ed.), Cross-Border Welfare State: Immigration, Social Security and Integrations, Antwerp, Intersentia.
6.
CarreraS.MerlinoM. (2009) Undocumented Immigrants and Rights in the EU, Addressing the Gap between Social Science Research and Policy-making in the Stockholm Programme, CEPS paper, available at www.ceps.eu.
7.
CholewinskiR. (2005) Irregular migrants: Access to minimum social rights, Strasbourg Council of Europe.
8.
Committee on Migrant Workers (2004) Conclusions on a fair deal for migrant workers in a global economy, International Labour Conference, 92nd Session, paragraph 27.
9.
EngbersenG.B.M.Van der LeunJ.P.De BoomJ.Van der HeijdenP.CruijffM. (2002) Illegale vreemdelingen in Nederland. Omvang, overkomst, verblijf en uitzetting, RISBO, Rotterdam, Erasmus University.
10.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2011–1) Migrants in an irregular situation: Access to healthcare in 10 European Member States, Luxemburg.
11.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2011–2) Migrants in an irregular situation employed in domestic work: Fundamental rights challenges for the European Union and its Member States, Luxemburg.
12.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights Report (2011–3) Fundamental rights of migrants in an irregular situation in the European Union, Luxemburg.
13.
FergusonJ. (2006) ‘Transnational Topographies of Power: Beyond “the state” and “civil society” in the Study of African Politics’ in Global Shadows: Africa in the neoliberal World Order, Durham NC, Duke University Press.
14.
FinchJ. (1989) Family Obligations and Social Change, Cambridge, Polity Press.
15.
GuildE. (2004) ‘Who is an Irregular Migrant’, in BoguszB.CholewinskiR.CyganA.SzyszczakE. (eds.), Irregular Migration and Human Rights: Theoretical, European and International Perspectives, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
16.
GuildE. (2009) ‘Criminalisation of Migration in Europa: Human Rights Implications’, Issue Paper Commissioner for Human Rights, Council of Europe.
17.
GuiraudonV. (2000) ‘The Mashallian triptych reordered: The role of courts and bureaucracies in furthering migrant rights’, in BommesM.GeddesA. (eds.), Immigration and Welfare, Challenging the borders of the welfare state, London, Routledge.
18.
GüntherS. (2011) ‘Struggling for Recognitions. The unionization of (un)documented migrant domestic workers in the Netherlands’, Master's thesis, Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam.
19.
Hamburg Institute of International Economics (2009) ‘Database on Irregular Migration’, Working Paper No. 4/2009.
20.
HailbronnerK. (2006) ‘Union Citizenship and Social Rights’, in CarlierJ.-Y.GuildE. (eds.), The Future of Free Movement of Persons in the EU, Brussels, Bruylant, 65–78.
21.
HesselmanM. (2013) ‘Sharing International Responsibility for Poor Migrants? An analysis of Extra-Territorial Socio-Economic Human Rights Law’, in this issue.
22.
HolzmannR.KoettlJ. (2011) ‘Portability of Pension, Health, and other Social Benefits: Facts, Concepts, Issues’, World Bank discussion papers, No. 1110.
23.
ILO (1977) Social security for migrant workers, Geneva.
24.
ILO (2008) ‘Best practices in social insurance for migrant workers: The case of Sri Lanka’, ILO Asian Regional Programme on Governance of Labour Migration, Working Paper 12.
25.
ISSA (2010) ‘Managing of voluntary insurance, the case of the Social Insurance Institute in Albania’ in Good practices in Social Security, Geneva.
26.
KabkiM. (2007) Transnationalism, local development and social security. The functioning of support networks in rural Ghana, Leiden, African Studies Centre.
27.
KapuyK. (2011) The social security position of irregular migrant workers. New insights from national social security law and international law, Antwerp, Intersentia.
28.
MinderhoudP. (2000) ‘The Dutch linking act and the violation of various international non-discrimination clauses’, European Journal of Migration Law, 2(2), 185–201.
29.
MarchettiS. (2005) ‘“We Had Different Fortunes”. Relationships between Filipina domestic workers and their employers in Rome and Amsterdam’, Master's Thesis in Women's Studies, Utrecht, University of Utrecht.
30.
MazzaliA.MuliroA.ZarroA.ZupiM. (2006) ‘It's our problem too: Views on African Migration and Development. Major outcomes of an International Workshop, a Multidisciplinary Delphi Consultation and Interviews’, Research Paper, Rome, Centro Studi di Politica Internazionale (CeSPI).
31.
MazzucatoV. (2005) ‘“Ghanaian Migrants” Double Engagement: A Transnational View of Development and Integration Policies’, Global Migration Perspectives, 48.
32.
MikkolaM. (2008) ‘Social human rights of migrants under the European Social Charter’, European Journal of Social Security, 10(1), 25–59.
ParreñasR. (2001) Servants of Globalization. Women, migration and domestic work, Stanford, CA., Stanford University Press.
35.
PietersD.SchoukensP. (2004) Explanatory report on the access to social protection for illegal labour migrants, Strasbourg, Council of Europe.
36.
PlatteauJ.P. (1991) ‘Traditional systems of social security and hunger insurance: Past achievements and modern challenges’, in AhmadE.DrèzeJ.HillsJ.SenA. (eds.), Social security in developing countries, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
SlingenbergL. (2012) Between Sovereignty and Equality, the Reception of Asylum Seekers under International law, PhD dissertation, Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
39.
SmithL. (2006) ‘A home in the city: Transnational investments in urban housing’, paper presented at XVI ISA World conference of Sociology, Research Committee on Sociology of Migration, Durban, South Africa.
40.
SmithL. (2007) Tied to Migrants. Transnational influences on the economy of Accra, Ghana, Leiden, Africa Studies Centre.
41.
StaringR. (2001) Reizen onder regie. Het migratieproces van illegale Turken in Nederland, Amsterdam, Het Spinhuis.
42.
Van der LeunJ. (2003) Looking for Loopholes. Processes of incorporation of illegal immigrants in the Netherlands, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.
43.
van der MeiA.P. (2002) ‘European Union citizenship, freedom of movement and social assistance benefits’ in BerghmanJ. (eds.), Social Security in Transition, Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International.
44.
van GinnekenW. (2008) ‘Making social security accessible to migrants’, paper presented at the World Social Security Forum, Cape Town, ISSA.
45.
Van WalsumS. (2000) De schaduw van de grens. Het Nederlandse vreemdelingenrecht en de sociale zekerheid van Javaanse Surinamers, Rotterdam, Sanders Instituut and Gouda Quint.
46.
Van WalsumS. (2008) The Family and the Nation: Dutch Family Migration Policies in the Context of Changing Family Norms, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
47.
Van WalsumS. (2010) ‘Migrants, banks and security issues in a context of globalisation’, paper written for the conference ‘Critical Perspectives on Security’, University of Maastricht, May 27–28.
48.
Van WalsumS. (2011) ‘Migration and the regulation of care. Notes from a transnational field of enquiry’, paper presented at the conference ‘Making Connections: Migration, Gender and Care Labour in Transnational Context’, University of Oxford, 14–15 April.
49.
VermeulenB.P. (2010) ‘On freedom, equality and citizenship’, in FobletsM.-C.Gaudreault-DesbiensJ.F.RentelnA. Dendes (eds.), Cultural Diversity and the Law. State Responses from around the World, Brussels, Bruylant.
50.
VonkG.J. (2001) ‘Migration, Social Security and the Law, Some European Dilemmas’, European Journal of Social Security, 3(4), 315–332.
51.
VonkG.J. (ed.) (2012) Cross-Border Welfare State. Immigration, Social Security and Integration, Antwerp, Intersentia.
52.
Von Benda-BeckmannF.Von Benda-BeckmannK. (1994) ‘Coping with insecurity’, Focaal, No. 22/23.
53.
WilliamsF. (2009) Claiming and Framing in the Making of Care Policies: The Recognition and Redistribution of Care, New York, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
