This paper investigates whether there is a convergence in welfare state programmes among the ‘old’ EU Member States. To identify such trends, the study relies on net pension and net unemployment replacement rates, as well as on public social expenditure data. Empirically, a sample of 14 economies (EU-15 excluding Luxembourg) between 1980 and 2005 is used. The empirical findings reveal the presence of a convergence process, driven by a strong catch-up in social protection levels in the southern Member States. Furthermore, convergence in replacement rates is substantially less pronounced than convergence in public social expenditure. In sum, the results indicate that the converging trend of public social expenditure and unemployment benefits has continued in advanced industrialised countries and over time. These findings confirm and expand on earlier studies (Caminada et al. 2001; Starke et al. 2008; Schmitt and Starke 2011).
AlsasuaJ.Bilbao-UbillosJ. and OlaskoagaJ. (2007) ‘The EU Integration Process and the Convergence of Social Protection Benefits at National Level’, International Journal of Social Welfare16(4), 297–306.
2.
ArmingeonK. (2010) Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2008, University of Berne.
3.
AtkinsonA.B. (1996) Incomes and the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AttiaN. and BerengerV. (2007) ‘Social protection convergence in the European Union: Impact of Maastricht treaty’, Panoeconomicus54(44), 469–487.
5.
BaltagiB. (2005) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, New York, NY: Wiley.
6.
BarroR. and MartinSala-I X. (1992) ‘Convergence’, Journal of Political Economy100, 223–251.
7.
BaumC. (2001) ‘Residual diagnostics for cross-section time series regression models’, The Stata Journal1, 101–104.
8.
BaumolW. (1996) ‘Children of Performing Arts, the Economic Dilemma: The Climbing Costs of Health Care and Education’, Journal of Cultural Economics20, 183–206.
9.
BeckN. (2005) ‘Time Series Cross-Section Data – Dynamics – Continuous’, Oxford Spring School Workshop.
10.
BeckN. and KatzJ.N. (1995) ‘What to do (and not to do) with time series cross-section data’, American Political Science Review89(3), 634–47.
11.
BeckN. and KatzJ.N. (1996) ‘Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models’, Political Analysis6(1), 1–36.
12.
CaminadaK.GoudswaardK. and Van VlietO. (2010) ‘Patterns of Welfare State Indicators in the EU: Is there Convergence?’, Journal of Common Market Studies48(3), 529–556.
13.
CastlesF. (2002) ‘Developing new measures of welfare state change and reform’, European Journal of Political Research41, 613–641.
14.
CastlesF. (2004) The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
ClasenJ. and SiegelN. (2007) Investigating Welfare State Change. The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
16.
CorradoL.LondonoD.MenniniF. and TrovatoG. (2003) ‘The Welfare States in a United Europe’, European Political Economy Review1, 40–55.
17.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
Esping-AndersenG. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
FerreraM. (1996) ‘The Southern model of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy6(1), 17–37.
20.
FerreraM. and RhodesM. (2000) The Future of Social Europe. Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy, Oeiras: Celta Editora.
21.
GarrettG. and MitchellD. (2001) ‘Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD’, European Journal of Political Research39 (2), 145–77.
22.
GreeneW. (2000) Econometric analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
HailbronnerK. (2006) ‘The EU Directive on free movement and access to social benefits’, CESifo DICE Report 4/2006, 8–13.
24.
HuberE. and StephensJ. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
ImK.PesaranM. and ShinY. (2003) ‘Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels’, Journal of Econometrics115(1), 53–74.
26.
IversenT. and CusackT. (2000) ‘The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization?’, World Politics52, 313–49.
27.
KittelB. and ObingerH. (2003) ‘Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity’, Journal of European Public Policy10(1), 20–45.
28.
KittelB. and WinnerH. (2005) ‘How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalisation–welfare state nexus revisited’, European Journal of Political Research44, 269–293.
29.
KorpiW. and PalmeJ. (2003) ‘New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries’, American Political Science Review97(3), 425–446.
30.
KorpiW. and PalmeJ. (2007) The Social Citizenship Indicator Program (SCIP), Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.
31.
LevinA. and ChuC. (2002) ‘Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties’, Journal of Econometrics108, 1–24.
32.
MenzieD. and HiroI. (2008) ‘A new Measure of Financial Openness’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis10(3), 309–322.
33.
MontanariI.NelsonK. and PalmeJ. (2007) ‘Convergence Pressures and Responses: Recent Social Insurance Development in Modern Welfare States’, Comparative Sociology6, 295–323.
34.
MontanariI.NelsonK. and PalmeJ. (2008) ‘Towards a European Social Model?’, European Societies10(5), 787–810.
35.
PiersonP. (1996) ‘The new politics of the welfare state’, World Politics48, 143–179.
36.
RodrikD. (1998) ‘Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?’, Journal of Political Economy106(5), 997–1032.
37.
ScharpfF. (2000) ‘Economic changes, vulnerabilities, and institutional capabilities’, in ScharpfW. and SchmidtV. (eds.) Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
ScharpfF. (2002) ‘The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity’, Journal of Common Market Studies40(4), 645–670.
39.
SchmittC. and StarkeP. (2011) ‘Explaining convergence of OECD welfare states: A conditional approach’, Journal of European Social Policy21(2), 120–135.
40.
StarkeP.ObingerH. and CastlesF. (2008) ‘Convergence towards where: In what ways, if any, are welfare states becoming more similar?’, Journal of European Public Policy15(7), 975–1000.
41.
ScruggsL. (2004) Welfare State Entitlements Data Set: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Eighteen Welfare States.
42.
ScruggsL. and AllanJ. (2004) ‘Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies’, American Journal of Political Science48(3), 496–512.
43.
SinnH. (2002) ‘EU enlargement and the future of the welfare state’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy49, 104–15.
44.
TanziV. (2002) ‘Globalisation and the future of Social protection’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy49, 116–27.
45.
Taylor-GoobyP. (2004) New Risks, New Welfare. The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
