Converging Trends of Social Policy in Europe: Social Security Benefit Reform in the UK,the Netherlands and Finland

Abstract

It has been suggested that similar challenges in the socio-economic environments of European welfare states necessitate convergence of national social security benefit programmes. However, convergence remains an ambiguous matter in social policy research, both with regard to its conceptualisation and to its operationalisation. This article attempts to contribute to this debate by revisiting the concept of convergence and analysing empirically the welfare reforms in three European countries (the UK, the Netherlands, Finland) and two benefit programmes (unemployment and disability insurance benefit programmes) over a period of 26 years (1980–2006). Based on data relating to legal changes in benefit rights and conditions, it is argued that changes in European social security programme have, over time, moved the programmes towards common points. The reforms in the countries that are examined highlight four trends, namely increased work-relatedness in benefit rules, growing activation of benefit recipients, more stringent targeting of the programmes and reduced generosity of benefit entitlements. The data are also used to demonstrate the importance of an analytical approach as a general theoretical device: the article demonstrates how convergence occurred only at the level of broad policy goals, and not at the level of policy instruments.

Keywords

welfare state reform social security convergence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett

(1991), ‘What is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?’, British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215–233.

Bolderson

and Mabbett

(1995), ‘Mongrels or thoroughbreds: A cross-national look at social security systems’, European journal of Political Research, 28, 119–139.

Bolderson

and Mabbett

(1996), ‘Cost containment in complex social security systems; the limitation of targeting’, International Social Security Review, 49(1), 3–17.

Bouget

(2003), ‘Convergence in Social Welfare Systems in Europe: From goal to reality’, Social Policy and Administration, 37(6), 674–693.

Castles

(2004), The Future of Welfare State: Crisis myths and crisis realities, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Clasen

(ed.) (1998), Comparative Social Policy: Concepts, theories and methods, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.

Clasen

(2005), Reforming European Welfare States: Germany and the United Kingdom compared, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Clasen

and van Oorschot

(2003), ‘Classic Principles and Designs in European Social Security’, in Pieters

(ed.), European Social Security and Global Politics, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

Cornelissen

and Goudswaard

(2002), ‘On the Convergence of Social Protection Systems in the European Union’, International Social Security Review, 55(3), 3–17.

10.

Daly

(1997), ‘Welfare State under pressure: Cash benefits in European welfare states over the ten last years’, Journal of European Social Policy, 7(2), 129–146.

11.

Esping-Andersen

(1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity Press.

12.

Esping-Andersen

(1999), Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

13.

Ferrera

Hemerijck

and Rhodes

(2000), The Future of Social Europe: Recasting work and welfare in the new Economy, Oieras, Celta Editoria.

14.

Flora

(ed.) (1986), Growth to Limits. The Western European Welfare States Since World War II, Berlin, New York, Walter de Gruyter.

15.

Gelissen

(2001), Worlds of Welfare, Worlds of Consent? Public Opinion on welfare state, Thela Thesis.

16.

Greve

(1996), ‘Indications of Social Policy Convergence in Europe’, Social Policy and Administration, 30(4), 348–367.

17.

Hall

and Soskice

(2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.

18.

Hay

(2004), ‘Common Trajectories, Variable Paces, Divergent Outcomes? Models of European capitalism under conditions of complex economic interdependence’, Review of International Political Economy, 11(2), 231–262.

19.

Huber

Ragin

and Stephen

(1993), ‘Social democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State’, American Journal of Sociology, 99, 711–749.

20.

Hvinden

Heikkilä

and Kankare

(2001), ‘Towards Activation? The changing relationship between social protection and employment in Western Europe’, in Kautto

Hvinden

Kvist

and Uusitalo

(eds.), Nordic Welfare States in European Context, London, Routledge.

21.

Kerr

(1983), The Future of Industrial Societies: Convergence or continuing diversity, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

22.

Knill

(2005), ‘Introduction: Cross-national Policy Convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764–774.

23.

Korpi

(2003), ‘Welfare-State Regress in Western Europe: Politics, Institutions, Globalization, and Europeanization’, Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 589–609.

24.

Montanari

Nelson

and Palme

(2007), ‘Convergence Pressures and Responses: Recent social insurance development in modern welfare states’, Comparative Sociology, 6, 295–323.

25.

O'Connor

(2007), ‘Convergence in European Welfare State Analysis: Convergence of what?’, in Clasen

and Siegel

(eds.), Investigating Welfare State Change. The ‘dependent variable’ problem in comparative analysis, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

26.

Pierson

(ed.) (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press.

27.

Van Kersbergen

(1995), Social Capitalism: A study of Christian democracy and the welfare state, London, Routledge.

28.

Van Gerven

(2008a), The Broad Tracks of Path Dependent Benefit Reforms. A longitudinal study of social benefit reform in three European countries, 1980–2006, Helsinki, Social Insurance Institution.

29.

Van Gerven

(2008b), ‘Sosiaalipoliittisten Reformien Voittajat ja Häviäjät: Työttömyysturvalain muutokset Iso-Britanniassa, Alankomaissa ja Suomessa 1980–2006, (The Winners and Losers of Social Policy Reforms: Changes in unemployment benefit programmes in the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland, 1980–2006)’, Yhteiskuntapolitiikka (forthcoming).

30.

Van Gerven

(2008c) ‘Welfare Reform in the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland: Path dependent but not predetermined change’, Journal of European Social Policy (submitted).

31.

Van Gerven

and Beckers

(2009), ‘Unemployment protection reform in Belgium, Finland, the Netherlands and the UK. Policy learning through OMC?’, in Zeitlin

and Heidenreich

(eds.), Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Labour Market and Welfare Reforms, London, Routledge.

32.

Wilensky

(1975), The Welfare State and Equality. Structural and Ideological Roots of Social Expenditure, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.