Abstract
Background
Dementia is a common complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), influenced by both genetic susceptibility and social disadvantages. While polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been widely applied to assess genetic vulnerability, the contribution of social determinants and their interaction with genetic risk are less understood.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the independent and joint effects of PRS and polysocial risk scores (PsRS) on post-T2DM dementia risk.
Methods
A prospective cohort study was conducted using UK Biobank data. PsRS and PRS were derived from multidimensional social and genetic indicators, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine their associations with dementia outcomes. In genetically susceptible individuals, seven machine learning models were applied to predict dementia risk. SHAP and ALE were used to interpret feature importance.
Results
Among 5,624 participants with T2DM, those in the highest PsRS group had a markedly elevated risk of all-cause dementia (HR = 2.738; 95% CI: 1.556–4.818, p < 0.001). This association persisted among genetically susceptible individuals. Machine learning analyses in the medium-to-high PRS group showed that eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) achieved the best predictive performance (F1 = 0.735, AUC = 0.726). SHAP interpretation highlighted employment status (mean |SHAP value| = 0.45) and educational level (mean |SHAP value| = 0.19) as the strongest social contributors to dementia risk.
Conclusions
Both social disadvantages and genetic susceptibility contribute to dementia risk in individuals with T2DM. These findings underscore the importance of addressing modifiable social factors in targeted dementia prevention strategies for high-genetic-risk populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
