Abstract
Background
Alzheimer's disease (AD) exhibits significant clinical and pathological heterogeneity, particularly during the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) transitional stage. Current understanding of the molecular drivers underlying distinct MCI progression trajectories remains incomplete, hindering the development of personalized interventions.
Objective
This study aims to integrate transcriptomic, epigenomic, and metabolomic data to identify distinct trajectories in the progression from MCI to AD, and to explore the underlying disease heterogeneity.
Methods
We integrated transcriptomic, epigenomic, and metabolomic data from MCI patients to model the progression to AD and stratified them into subtypes. We then examined molecular differences between MCI and AD within each subtype, identifying key immune microenvironments and regulatory pathways via immune cell infiltration analysis, WGCNA, and GO/KEGG analyses. Finally, we applied Cox regression to identify prognostic biomarkers and built a random forest prognostic model.
Results
Our analysis identified two distinct MCI-to-AD progression subtypes. Subtype 1 was marked by metabolic dysregulation and slower cognitive decline, while Subtype 2 was driven by chronic immune activation and exhibited faster cognitive decline. The trajectory subtypes captured molecular perturbations that were missed by traditional unclustered methods. Prognostic models based on these molecular signatures predicted disease progression over 1–5 years, with AUROC values ranging from 0.851 to 0.893 for Subtype 1 and from 0.878 to 0.927 for Subtype 2.
Conclusions
Our findings highlight the importance of multi-omics trajectory stratification in understanding the heterogeneity of AD progression. The identification of two distinct progression trajectories provides insights into the underlying mechanisms of AD.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
