Despite technological advances and earlier and more confident diagnoses, there is a lack of post-diagnosis support for couples navigating the challenges of early dementia. Clinically elevated emotional distress is common for both partners after diagnosis, and interferes with the health, relationships, and adjustment of both partners if not addressed.
Objective
Our objective was to gather in-depth information on couples’ preferences to inform the development of a proposed dyadic intervention addressing emotional distress early (within 6 months) after one partners’ receipt of a dementia diagnosis.
Methods
We recruited couples after a recent dementia diagnosis (N = 16 dyads; 32 participants) from a large academic medical center via direct provider referrals for 60-min virtual dyadic interviews. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach to thematic analysis.
Results
We identified themes within 3 a-priori determined domains. For dyadic intervention format (domain 1), couples preferred to participate in sessions together and to have flexible options for telehealth and in-person participation. Preferences for intervention content (domain 2) included information on dementia, skills to reduce distress and promote resiliency, and support to communicate about the diagnosis and related stress. Barriers and facilitators (domain 3) included denial or hesitation, resource constraints, and interests in learning skills and connecting to others.
Conclusions
We gathered comprehensive information that could be used to adapt existing dyadic interventions and to tailor support to match couples’ preferences early after dementia diagnoses. Early interventions should prioritize flexible delivery of information and skills to couples to support adaptive coping following dementia diagnoses.
El-HayekYHWileyREKhouryCP, et al.Tip of the iceberg: assessing the global socioeconomic costs of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and strategic implications for stakeholders. J Alzheimers Dis2019; 70: 323–341.
3.
EdwardsHBIjazSWhitingPF, et al.Quality of family relationships and outcomes of dementia: a systematic review. BMJ Open2018; 8: e015538.
4.
MittelmanMSO’ConnorMKDonleyT, et al.Longitudinal study: understanding the lived experience of couples across the trajectory of dementia. BMC Geriatr2021; 21: 558.
5.
CollobySWhitingSWarrenA. Supporting the couple relationship following dementia diagnosis: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community2022; 30: e3643–e3655.
6.
PettySHarveyKGriffithsA, et al.Emotional distress with dementia: a systematic review using corpus-based analysis and meta-ethnography. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2018; 33: 679–687.
7.
LouYVuTPiechotaA, et al.Emotion regulation in people living with dementia and their spouses: the role of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Aging Ment Health2024; 28: 1733–1740.
8.
ColcloughCMilesERustedJ, et al.Emotion-focused dyadic coping styles used by family carers of people with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dementia2023; 22: 1205–1226.
9.
GellertPHäuslerAGholamiM, et al.Own and partners’ dyadic coping and depressive symptoms in individuals with early-stage dementia and their caregiving partners. Aging Ment Health2018; 22: 1014–1022.
10.
WawrzicznyEBernaGDucharmeF, et al.Modeling the distress of spousal caregivers of people with dementia. J Alzheimers Dis2017; 55: 703–716.
11.
RevensonTADeLongisA. Couples coping with chronic illness. In: FolkmanS (eds) The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp.101–123.
12.
BrandãoTBritesRHipólitoJ, et al.Emotion regulation in dementia caregiving: the role of neuropsychiatric symptoms and attachment orientation. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol2024; 37: 146–156.
13.
LaverKMilteRDyerS, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing carer focused and dyadic multicomponent interventions for carers of people with dementia. J Aging Health2017; 29: 1308–1349.
14.
PoonE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of dyadic psychological interventions for BPSD, quality of life and/or caregiver burden in dementia or MCI. Clin Gerontol2022; 45: 777–797.
15.
BadrHAcitelliLK. Re-thinking dyadic coping in the context of chronic illness. Curr Opin Psychol2017; 13: 44–48.
16.
BannonSMGrunbergVAManglaniHR, et al.Together from the start: a transdiagnostic framework for early dyadic interventions for neurodegenerative diseases. J Am Geriatr Soc2022; 70: 1850–1862.
17.
Stockwell-SmithGMoyleWKellettU. The impact of early psychosocial intervention on self-efficacy of care recipient/carer dyads living with early-stage dementia—a mixed-methods study. J Adv Nurs2018; 74: 2167–2180.
18.
BalvertSCDel SordoGCMildersMV. The efficacy of dyadic interventions for community-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev2024; 96: 102258.
19.
BannonSMLesterEGGatesMV, et al.Recovering together: building resiliency in dyads of stroke patients and their caregivers at risk for chronic emotional distress; a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud2020; 6: 75.
20.
LesterEGGrunbergVABannonSM, et al.The Recovering Together Initiative: integrating psychosocial care into ICUs. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv2022; 3: CAT. 22.0103.
21.
MeyersEEMcCurleyJLesterE, et al.Building resiliency in dyads of patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit and their family caregivers: lessons learned from William and Laura. Cogn Behav Pract2020; 27: 321–335.
22.
VranceanuA-MBannonSMaceR, et al.Feasibility and efficacy of a resiliency intervention for the prevention of chronic emotional distress among survivor-caregiver dyads admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open2020; 3: e2020807.
23.
VranceanuA-MWoodworthECKanayaMR, et al.The Recovering Together study protocol: a single-blind RCT to prevent chronic emotional distress in patient-cargiver dyads in the Neuro-ICU. Contemp Clin Trials2022; 123: 106998.
24.
HicksAJBrewerJAhmadN, et al.Dementia care specialists perspectives of diagnosis and early psychosocial care: a qualitative analysis of focus groups in two large academic medical centers. medRxiv2024. Posted December 05, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.04.24316485 [Preprint].
25.
BannonSMBrewerJAhmadN, et al.A live video dyadic resiliency intervention to prevent chronic emotional distress early after dementia diagnoses: protocol for a dyadic mixed methods study. JMIR Res Protoc2023; 12: e45532.
26.
DavisDHCreavinSTYipJL, et al.Montreal Cognitive assessment for the detection of dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2021; 7: CD010775.
27.
BjørnholtMFarstadGR. Am I rambling?’on the advantages of interviewing couples together. Qual Res2014; 14: 3–19.
28.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods2006; 5: 80–92.
29.
GaleNKHeathGCameronE, et al.Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol2013; 13: 117.
30.
LucianiMStrachanPHContiA, et al.Methodological and practical considerations in rapid qualitative research: lessons learned from a team-based global study during COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Qual Methods2021; 20: 16094069211040302.
31.
SocioCultural Research Consultants LLC. Dedoose Version 9.0.17, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data, https:// www.Dedoose.com (2021).
32.
GiesenLRoeserA. Structuring a team-based approach to coding qualitative data. Int J Qual Methods2020; 19: 1609406920968700.
33.
ManceauCAntoinePDeleruyelleJ, et al.Dyadic processes and adjustment of couples experiencing a neurodegenerative disease: a meta-synthesis. Health Psychol Rev2024; 18: 508–537.
34.
ShahANagpalAManjulaV, et al.Combined couples’ therapy: a qualitative study of individual and conjoint sessions. J Fam Psychother2016; 27: 99–108.
35.
Orsulic-JerasSWhitlatchCJSzaboSM, et al.The SHARE program for dementia: implementation of an early-stage dyadic care-planning intervention. Dementia2019; 18: 360–379.
36.
HanA. Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on depressive symptoms, anxiety, stress, and quality of life in family caregivers of persons living with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Aging2022; 44: 494–509.
37.
JackmanVWolversonEClarkeC, et al.A participatory approach to understand what might be most meaningful to people living with dementia in a positive psychology intervention. Aging Ment Health2024; 28: 1090–1099.
38.
BannonSMGrunbergVAReichmanM, et al.Thematic analysis of dyadic coping in couples with young-onset dementia. JAMA Netw Open2021; 4: e216111.
39.
WeaksDWilkinsonHMcLeodJ. Daring to tell: the importance of telling others about a diagnosis of dementia. Ageing Soc2015; 35: 765–784.
40.
Turró-GarrigaOConde-SalaJLRene-RamirezR, et al.Prevalence of anosognosia in Alzheimer’s disease. Med Clin (Barc)2013; 143: 13–19.
41.
ParkerMBarlowSHoeJ, et al.Persistent barriers and facilitators to seeking help for a dementia diagnosis: a systematic review of 30 years of the perspectives of carers and people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr2020; 32: 611–634.
42.
PozzebonMDouglasJAmesD. Spouses’ experience of living with a partner diagnosed with a dementia: a synthesis of the qualitative research. Int Psychogeriatr2016; 28: 537–556.
43.
CheungDSKTangSKHoKHM, et al.Strategies to engage people with dementia and their informal caregivers in dyadic intervention: a scoping review. Geriatr Nur (Lond)2021; 42: 412–420.
44.
SöderlundMHellströmIVamstadJ, et al.Peer support for the newly diagnosed: how people with dementia can co-produce meeting centre services. Ageing Soc2024; 44: 180–199.
45.
ReubenDBGillTMStevensA, et al.Health system, community-based, or usual dementia care for persons with dementia and caregivers: the D-CARE randomized clinical trial. JAMA2025; 333: 950–961.
46.
DrosselCFisherJEMercerV. A DBT skills training group for family caregivers of persons with dementia. Behav Ther2011; 42: 109–119.
47.
GitlinLNWinterLDennisMP, et al.A biobehavioral home-based intervention and the well-being of patients with dementia and their caregivers: the COPE randomized trial. JAMA2010; 304: 983–991.
48.
D’CunhaNMBennettMMitterfellnerR, et al.The Sustainable Personalised Interventions for Cognition, Care, and Engagement (SPICE) program: a twelve week reablement intervention for people with dementia and carers. Alzheimers Dement2023; 19: e079127.
49.
ClareLKudlickaAOyebodeJR, et al.Individual goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation to improve everyday functioning for people with early-stage dementia: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (the GREAT trial). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2019; 34: 709–721.
50.
JeonY-HSimpsonJFethneyJ, et al.Effectiveness of the Interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Programme (I-HARP) on improving functional independence of people living with dementia: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, open-label, controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2025: jnnp-2024–334514. Epub ahead of print 16 January 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-334514.
51.
GitlinLNMarxKPiersolCV, et al.Effects of the tailored activity program (TAP) on dementia-related symptoms, health events and caregiver wellbeing: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr2021; 21: 581.
52.
CaseyDDoylePGallagherN, et al.The comprehensive resilience-building psychosocial intervention (CREST) for people with dementia in the community: a feasibility and acceptability study. Pilot Feasibility Stud2024; 10: 136.
53.
TayK-WSubramaniamPOeiTP. Cognitive behavioural therapy can be effective in treating anxiety and depression in persons with dementia: a systematic review. Psychogeriatrics2019; 19: 264–275.
54.
ChenMGongJLinC, et al.A couple-based dyadic coping intervention for couples coping with colorectal cancer: a pilot feasibility study. Eur J Oncol Nurs2023; 63: 102226.
55.
GrunbergVABannonSMReichmanM, et al.Psychosocial treatment preferences of persons living with young-onset dementia and their partners. Dementia2022; 21: 41–60.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
