Structural changes in medial temporal lobes including the fusiform gyrus, a critical area in face recognition, precede the progression of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, how the neural correlates of face processing altered in aMCI, as well as their association with cognitive impairments, remain unclear.
Objective
Using electroencephalogram (EEG), we explored the electrophysiological markers of face-specific visual processing alterations in aMCI and examined their relationship with cognitive deficits.
Methods
We recruited participants with aMCI (n = 32) and healthy controls (HC, n = 41) and used a passive viewing task to measure the event-related potential (ERP) in response to faces and non-face objects. To compare face processing in aMCI patients and HCs, we adopted mass univariate analysis and representational similarity analysis (RSA) to explore aMCI-related alterations in ERPs.
Results
We found that face inversion effect (FIE) in P1 amplitudes was absent in aMCI patients. Also, compared to HCs, aMCI patients exhibited a lack of right hemisphere advantage in N170 in response to faces. Furthermore, representation similarity analysis of ERP in posterior-temporal regions revealed that aMCI patients represent face and non-face objects distinctively from HCs in the early processing stage. Additionally, the FIE in P1 amplitude positively correlated to aMCI patients’ visuospatial functions.
Conclusions
These findings showed aMCI-related changes in the early perceptual processing of faces and highlights the potential of the FIE in P1 amplitude and ERP patterns over occipital-temporal regions as electrophysiological markers for aMCI and AD.
JackCRBennettDABlennowK, et al.NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement2018; 14: 535–562.
2.
TosunDDemirZVeitchDP, et al.Contribution of Alzheimer’s biomarkers and risk factors to cognitive impairment and decline across the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Alzheimers Dement2022; 18: 1370–1382.
3.
WerheidKClareL. Are faces special in Alzheimer’s disease? Cognitive conceptualisation, neural correlates, and diagnostic relevance of impaired memory for faces and names. Cortex2007; 43: 898–906.
4.
SeelyeAMHowiesonDBWildKV, et al.Wechsler memory scale–III faces test performance in patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2009; 31: 682–688.
5.
LavalléeMMGandiniDRouleauI, et al.A qualitative impairment in face perception in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from a reduced face inversion effect. J Alzheimers Dis2016; 51: 1225–1236.
6.
KanwisherNMcDermottJChunMM. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci1997; 17: 4302–4311.
7.
WhitwellJLPrzybelskiSAWeigandSD, et al.3D Maps from multiple MRI illustrate changing atrophy patterns as subjects progress from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Brain2007; 130: 1777–1786.
8.
RobertsKLAllenHA. Perception and cognition in the ageing brain: a brief review of the short- and long-term links between perceptual and cognitive decline. Front Aging Neurosci2016; 8: 39.
9.
GellersenHMTrelleANFarrarBG, et al.Medial temporal lobe structure, mnemonic and perceptual discrimination in healthy older adults and those at risk for mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging2023; 122: 88–106.
10.
PetersenRCSmithGEWaringSC, et al.Mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol1999; 56: 303.
11.
WinbladBPalmerKKivipeltoM, et al.Mild cognitive impairment - beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the international working group on mild cognitive impairment. J Intern Med2004; 256: 240–246.
12.
YinRK. Looking at upside-down faces. J Exp Psychol1969; 81: 141–145.
13.
RossionBBoremanseA. Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: evidence from the face composite illusion. J Vis2008; 8: 3.1–313.
14.
FreireALeeKSymonsLA. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence. Perception2000; 29: 159–170.
15.
RossionBGauthierITarrMJ, et al.The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects. Neuroreport2000; 11: 69–72.
16.
GaoCConteSRichardsJE, et al.The neural sources of N170: understanding timing of activation in face-selective areas. Psychophysiology2019; 56: e13336.
17.
RossionB. Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology. Trends Cogn Sci2014; 18: 310–318.
18.
ItierRJTaylorMJ. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. Neuroimage2004; 21: 1518–1532.
19.
MazziCMassironiGSanchez-LopezJ, et al.Face recognition deficits in a patient with Alzheimer’s disease: amnesia or agnosia? The importance of electrophysiological markers for differential diagnosis. Front Aging Neurosci2020; 12: 580609.
20.
LuLZhangCLiL. Mental imagery of face enhances face-sensitive event-related potentials to ambiguous visual stimuli. Biol Psychol2017; 129: 16–24.
21.
TaylorMJMcCarthyGSalibaE, et al.ERP Evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces. Clin Neurophysiol1999; 110: 910–915.
22.
JoyceCRossionB. The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: the effect of reference electrode site. Clin Neurophysiol2005; 116: 2613–2631.
23.
ItierRJTaylorMJ. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs. Neuroimage2002; 15: 353–372.
24.
MarsicanoGBertiniCRonconiL. Decoding cognition in neurodevelopmental, psychiatric and neurological conditions with multivariate pattern analysis of EEG data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2024; 164: 105795.
25.
KarimiHMarefatHKhanbagiM, et al.Temporal dynamics of animacy categorization in the brain of patients with mild cognitive impairment. PLoS One2022; 17: e0264058.
26.
ZhenYGaoLChenJ, et al.EEG Reveals alterations in motor imagery in people with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci2023; 78: 1474–1483.
27.
MarisEOostenveldR. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods2007; 164: 177–190.
28.
KriegeskorteNKievitRA. Representational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain. Trends Cogn Sci2013; 17: 401–412.
29.
ShuHShiYChenG, et al.Opposite neural trajectories of apolipoprotein e ε4 and ε2 alleles with aging associated with different risks of Alzheimer’s disease. Cereb Cortex2016; 26: 1421–1429.
30.
GaoLXuJZhangB, et al.Aging effects on early-stage face perception: an ERP study. Psychophysiology2009; 46: 970–983.
31.
DelormeAMakeigS. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods2004; 134: 9–21.
Pion-TonachiniLKreutz-DelgadoKMakeigS. ICLabel: an automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website. Neuroimage2019; 198: 181–197.
34.
OostenveldRFriesPMarisE, et al.Fieldtrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci2011; 2011: 156869.
35.
NiliHWingfieldCWaltherA, et al.A toolbox for representational similarity analysis. PLoS Comput Biol2014; 10: e1003553.
36.
DiedenhofenBMuschJ. Cocor: a comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS One2015; 10: e0121945.
37.
BoutsenLHumphreysGWPraamstraP, et al.Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: an ERP study of the Thatcher illusion. Neuroimage2006; 32: 352–367.
38.
Plaza-RosalesIBrunettiEMontefusco-SiegmundR, et al.Visual-spatial processing impairment in the occipital-frontal connectivity network at early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci2023; 15: 1097577.
39.
JavittDCMartinezASehatpourP, et al.Disruption of early visual processing in amyloid-positive healthy individuals and mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Res Ther2023; 15: 42.
40.
CabezaRAlbertMCraikF, et al.Cognitive neuroscience of healthy aging: maintenance, reserve, and compensation. Nat Rev Neurosci2018; 19: 701–710.
41.
KoenJDRuggMD. Neural dedifferentiation in the aging brain. Trends Cogn Sci2019; 23: 547–559.
42.
ChengPJPaiMC. Dissociation between recognition of familiar scenes and of faces in patients with very mild Alzheimer disease: an event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol2010; 121: 1519–1525.
43.
SaavedraCIglesiasJOlivaresEI. Event-related potentials elicited by the explicit and implicit processing of familiarity in faces. Clin EEG Neurosci2010; 41: 24–31.
44.
SchefterMWerheidKAlmkvistO, et al.Recognition memory for emotional faces in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: an event-related potential study. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn2013; 20: 49–79.
45.
SaavedraCOlivaresEIIglesiasJ. Cognitive decline effects at an early stage: evidence from N170 and VPP. Neurosci Lett2012; 518: 149–153.
46.
ZhangTLiTHuangS, et al.Neural correlates of impaired learning and recognition of novel faces in mild cognitive impairment. Clin Neurophysiol2024; 160: 28–37.
47.
YovelG. Neural and cognitive face-selective markers: an integrative review. Neuropsychologia2016; 83: 5–13.
48.
RossionBTorfsKJacquesC, et al.Fast periodic presentation of natural images reveals a robust face-selective electrophysiological response in the human brain. J Vis2015; 15: 15.1.18.
49.
NanWLiuYZengX, et al.The spatiotemporal characteristics of N170 s for faces and words: a meta-analysis study. Psych J2022; 11: 5–17.
50.
YovelGTambiniABrandmanT. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces. Neuropsychologia2008; 46: 3061–3068.
51.
HarrisonMTStrotherL. Does face-selective cortex show a left visual field bias for centrally-viewed faces?Neuropsychologia2021; 159: 107956.
52.
IachiniTIavaroneASeneseV, et al.Visuospatial memory in healthy elderly, AD and MCI: a review. Curr Aging Sci2009; 2: 43–59.
53.
AlichniewiczKKBrunnerFKlünemannHH, et al.Structural and functional neural correlates of visuospatial information processing in normal aging and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging2012; 33: 2782–2797.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
