Abstract
Background
The adoption of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers in clinical practice is expected to increase following recent approval of disease-modifying therapies. Fully automated immunoassays, Elecsys platform, offer convenience and enhanced reliability.
Objective
This study was performed to evaluate the performance of the Elecsys assay in a Korean clinical setting, comparing its effectiveness to ELISA for detecting amyloid-PET positivity.
Methods
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42, pTau181, tTau, pTau181/Aβ42, and tTau/Aβ42 were evaluated using Elecsys kits on a Cobas e 411 analyzer and manual Innotest ELISA with paired frozen samples (
Results
Strong linear correlations were observed between Elecsys- and ELISA-measured Aβ42, pTau181, and tTau levels. Receiver operating characteristic-based cutoff points for pTau181/Aβ42 (0.0252) and tTau/Aβ42 (0.258) in Elecsys demonstrated the highest areas under the curve (0.97 and 0.96) and predictive values (96.6% for both) for detecting amyloid-PET abnormalities. No cases of abnormal amyloid PET status were found without concurrent abnormal CSF biomarkers when considering Elecsys Aβ42 and the pTau181/Aβ42 ratio simultaneously. In addition, previously established cutoffs for combined ratios effectively differentiated amyloid PET status in our samples.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated the utility of Elecsys-measured CSF AD biomarkers in agreement with amyloid-PET classification in the Korean population. The pTau181/Aβ42 and tTau/Aβ42 ratios were the most accurate in detecting amyloid-PET (+), with Elecsys showing higher accuracy than ELISA. The study also supported the applicability of common cutoffs from Western countries for these biomarkers in our samples.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
