With the rapid evolution of low-magnetic environments in scientific research, military and quantum metrology, the development of high-performance zero-magnetic structures is imperative. To accommodate the need for low magnetic permeability, long-term durability and superior mechanical properties, a novel type of concrete beam is proposed, incorporating zero-magnetic steel bars and low-magnetic concrete with white cement as the cementitious material and quartz sand and stone as aggregates. Eight beams were designed and tested under flexural loading. The experimental parameters included steel bar type, sectional height and reinforcement ratio. It is confirmed that the moment-resisting mechanism and failure pattern of the proposed beams are analogous to those of conventional concrete beams. Due to the higher strength of zero-magnetic steel, the flexural capacity of low-magnetic beams is significantly enhanced under equal stiffness design conditions. The load-displacement curves exhibited a similar morphology to those of ordinary reinforced beam, but without distinct yield plateau. Consequently, low-magnetic beams demonstrated smaller maximum crack widths and superior crack resistance. Based on the influence of low-magnetic concrete microstructure and surface treatments of zero-magnetic steel bars, recommended parameter values were proposed for the stiffness calculation formula and maximum crack width calculation formula of low-magnetic beams. Comparing two methods for determining the yield point of low-magnetic concrete beams, the farthest point method was found to more accurately reflect the actual behavior of low-magnetic steel beams by considering the continuous yield characteristics of zero-magnetic steel. A finite element model was established based on material constitutive relationships, and its computational accuracy was verified.
ACI Committee (2022) 318-19(22): Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (Reapproved 2022). American Concrete Institute. https://doi.org/10.14359/51716937
2.
AllainSChateauJPBouazizO, et al. (2004) Correlations between the calculated stacking fault energy and the plasticity mechanisms in Fe-Mn-C alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A387–389: 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.01.059
3.
BorkJHahlbohmHDKleinR (2000) The 8-layered magnetically shielded room of the PTB: design and construction. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Biomagnetism (Biomag2000). Helsinki University of Technology, 970–973.
4.
BotoEHolmesNLeggettJ, et al. (2018) Moving magnetoencephalography towards real-world applications with a wearable system. Nature555: 657–661. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26147
5.
British Standards Institution (BSI) (1997) BS 8111-1:1997, Structural Use of Concrete - Part 1: Code of Practice for Design and Construction. BSI.
CaoJLZhaoAMLiuJX, et al. (2014) Effect of Nb on microstructure and mechanical properties in non-magnetic high manganese steel. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International21(6): 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(14)60093-5
8.
ChengGHTangXCZhangZJ, et al. (2024) Effect of uniaxial compression on the microstructural evolution and magnetic properties of 20Mn23AlV non-magnetic structural steel. Materials Today Communications39: 108935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108935
CurtzeSKuokkalaVT (2010) Dependence of tensile deformation behavior of TWIP steels on stacking fault energy, temperature and strain rate. Acta Materialia58(15): 5129–5141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.049
11.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2004) EN 1992-1-1:2004, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. CEN.
12.
FalodunOEOkeSROkoroAM, et al. (2020) Characterization of cast manganese steels containing varying manganese and chromium additions. Materials Today: Proceedings28(2): 730–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.288
13.
FangJCWeiKJiangL, et al. (2022) Scientific facility for ultrasensitive measurement of magnetic field and inertial rotation and prospect of zero-magnetism science. Nano-Micro Letters43(10): 298–324.
14.
FengPChengSBaiY, et al. (2015) Mechanical behavior of concrete-filled square steel tube with FRP-Confined concrete core subjected to axial compression. Composite Structures123: 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.053
15.
FuJYGeXLiJT, et al. (2022) Seismic performance of concrete bridge piers reinforced by stainless steel bars: a quasi-static experimental study. Engineering Structures266: 114507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114507
16.
HadfieldRA (1926) Metallurgy and its influence on modern progress: with a survey of education and research. Nature117: 187–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/117187a0
17.
HamadBS (1995) Investigations of chemical and physical properties of white cement concrete. Advanced Cement Based Materials2(4): 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/1065-7355(95)90017-9
18.
HedayatiANajafizadehAKermanpurA, et al. (2010) The effect of cold rolling regime on microstructure and mechanical properties of AISI 304L stainless steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology210(8): 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.010
19.
HuangXXBeiYQSuiLL, et al. (2022) Reliability assessment on maximum crack width of concrete beams reinforced with high-strength steel bars. Journal of Building Engineering45: 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103564
20.
Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE) (2007) Standard Specifications for Concrete Structures. JSCE.
KirchheimAPRheinheimerVDal MolinDCC (2015) Comparative study of white and ordinary concretes with respect of carbonation and water absorption. Construction and Building Materials84: 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.020
23.
KornackTWSmullinSJLeeSK, et al. (2007) A low-noise ferrite magnetic shield. Applied Physics Letters90(22): 223501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2737357
24.
LooYCChowdhurySH (2018) Analysis and design of rectangular beams for bending. Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete3: 19–60.
25.
MaBLiCSHanYH, et al. (2016) γ→α′ martensitic transformation and magnetic property of cold rolled Fe-20Mn-4Al-0.3C steel. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials419: 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.06.013
26.
ModiAKaziF (2020) Magnetic-Signature prediction for efficient degaussing of naval vessels. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics56(9): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2020.3010421
PanYJZhaoLGYangP (2024) A Method of Preparing zero-magnetic Steel Bars for Special Non-magnetic Concrete Structures. Chinese Patent CN202410192156, Vol. 8.
29.
PassaroVMNCuccovilloAVaianiL, et al. (2017) Gyroscope technology and applications: a review in the industrial perspective. Sensors17(10): 2284. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102284
RomanKRomanSAndrewG (2023) On the magnetic properties of construction materials for magnetic observatories. Applied Sciences13(4): 2246. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042246
32.
SatoKIchinoseMHirotsuY, et al. (1989) Effects of deformation induced phase transformation and twinning on the mechanical properties of austenitic Fe-Mn-Al alloys. ISIJ International29(10): 868–877. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.29.868
33.
SimSJeonDYumWS, et al. (2020) Development of a clinker-free white binder of one-part CaO-activated GGBFS with TiO2 addition. Construction and Building Materials248: 118705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118705
34.
SoltnerHPabstUButzekM, et al. (2011) Design, construction, and performance of a magnetically shielded room for a neutron spin echo spectrometer. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Section A644(1): 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.01.094
35.
Standardization Administration of China (2012) GB/T 50152-2012: Standard for Test Method of Concrete Structures. China Architecture & Building Press.
36.
Standardization Administration of China (2024) GB/T 50010-2010: Code for Design of Concrete Structures. China Architecture & Building Press.
TakahashiHShindoYKinoshitaH, et al. (1998) Mechanical properties and damage behavior of non-magnetic high manganese austenitic steels. Journal of Nuclear Materials258–263: 1644–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(98)00282-7
TianXLiHZhangYS (2008) Effect of Al content on stacking fault energy in austenitic Fe-Mn-Al-C alloys. Journal of Materials Science43(18): 6214–6222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2919-0
41.
VisintinPOehlersDJ (2017) Fundamental mechanics that govern the flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams with fibre-reinforced concrete. Advances in Structural Engineering21(7): 1088–1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217739705
42.
WangJWuXYWangYJ, et al. (2023) Green, sustainable architectural bamboo with high light transmission and excellent electromagnetic shielding as a candidate for energy-saving buildings. Nano-Micro Letters15(1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00982-7
43.
XiaYEnomotoMYangZG, et al. (2013) Effects of alloying elements on the kinetics of austenitization from pearlite in Fe-C-M alloys. Philosophical Magazine93(9): 1095–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2012.744484
44.
ZhangGHChaeJYKimKH, et al. (2013) Effects of Mn, Si and Cr addition on the dissolution and coarsening of pearlitic cementite during intercritical austenitization in Fe-1mass%C alloy. Materials Characterization81: 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2013.04.007
45.
ZhangQDe CorteWWangWY, et al. (2023) Flexural ductility of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams with maximum reinforcement ratios. Materials and Structures56: 4. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-02092-7
46.
ZhengYSunZYSongSC, et al. (2025) Flexural performance of concrete beams hybrid reinforced with bundled stainless steel bars and BFRP bars. Engineering Structures343: 121077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121077
