In vibration-based structural health monitoring, frequency is widely used to judge the occurrence of damage, which is quite efficient and convenient. However, besides damage, variations of environmental factors, such as temperature and humidity can also cause the changes of frequency. To eliminate the effects of environmental factors, co-integration analysis method in the field of econometrics is adopted. First of all, the concept of co-integration analysis is presented. Then dynamic tests on a two-way curved arch bridge and three concrete simply supported model beams were introduced. The frequency, environmental temperature and humidity were recorded every one or 2 hours. After that, co-integration analysis was carried out and the co-integration equation among frequency, environmental temperature and humidity was determined. Finally, the effects of environmental temperature and humidity on the frequency were eliminated by the co-integration equation, which makes the vibration-based structural health monitoring method more accurate and reliable.
AljandaliATatahiM (2018) Economic and financial modelling with eviews. A Guide for Students and Professionals. Springer International Publishing.
2.
BolouraniABitarafMNekouvaght TakA (2021) Structural health monitoring of harbor caissons using support vector machine and principal component analysis. Structures33: 4501–4513.
3.
BoltonRStubbsNParkS, et al. (2001) Documentation of changes in modal properties of a concrete box‐girder bridge due to environmental and internal conditions. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering16(1): 42–57.
4.
BorlenghiPGentileCPirròM (2022) Continuous dynamic monitoring and automated modal identification of an arch bridge. In European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Springer International Publishing, pp. 166–176.
5.
BoxGEJenkinsGMReinselGC, et al. (2015) Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. John Wiley & Sons.
6.
CrossEJWordenK (2011) Approaches to nonlinear cointegration with a view towards applications in SHM. Journal of Physics: Conference Series305(1): 012069.
7.
CrossEJKooKYBrownjohnJMW, et al. (2013) Long-term monitoring and data analysis of the tamar bridge. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing35(1-2): 16–34.
8.
DaoPBStaszewskiWJ (2013) Cointegration approach for temperature effect compensation in lamb-wave-based damage detection. Smart Materials and Structures22(9): 095002.
9.
DengYDingYLLiAQ (2011) Quantitative evaluation of variability in modal frequencies of a suspension bridge under environmental conditions. Journal of Vibration and Shock30(8): 230–236.
10.
DickeyDAFullerWA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association74(366a): 427–431.
11.
DingYRenPZhaoH, et al. (2018) Structural health monitoring of a high-speed railway bridge: five years review and lessons learned. Smart Structures and Systems21(5): 695–703.
12.
DingYYeXWGuoY (2023) Data set from wind, temperature, humidity and cable acceleration monitoring of the Jiashao bridge. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring13(2): 579–589.
13.
EngleRFGrangerCW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society55: 251–276.
14.
EntezamiASarmadiHBehkamalB (2023) A novel double-hybrid learning method for modal frequency-based damage assessment of bridge structures under different environmental variation patterns. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing201: 110676.
15.
HanQMaQXuJ, et al. (2021) Structural health monitoring research under varying temperature condition: a review. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring11: 149–173.
16.
HeHWangWZhangX (2019) Frequency modification of continuous beam bridge based on co-integration analysis considering the effect of temperature and humidity. Structural Health Monitoring18(2): 376–389.
17.
HsuTYLohCH (2010) Damage detection accommodating nonlinear environmental effects by nonlinear principal component analysis. Structural Control and Health Monitoring: The Official Journal of the International Association for Structural Control and Monitoring and of the European Association for the Control of Structures17(3): 338–354.
18.
JiaoYLiuHWangX, et al. (2014) Temperature effect on mechanical properties and damage identification of concrete structure. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering2014(1-10): 1–10.
19.
JohansenS (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control12(2-3): 231–254.
20.
KimCYJungDSKimNS, et al. (2003) Effect of vehicle weight on natural frequencies of bridges measured from traffic-induced vibration. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration2: 109–115.
21.
LiJXYiTHQuCX, et al. (2023) Early warning for abnormal cable forces of cable-stayed bridges considering structural temperature changes. Journal of Bridge Engineering28(2): 04022137.
22.
LiangYLiDSongG, et al. (2018) Frequency co-integration-based damage detection for bridges under the influence of environmental temperature variation. Measurement125: 163–175.
23.
LiuGZhangJYaoX, et al. (2014) Damage detection from continuous long-term static response using cointegration and MEWMA control chart. Sustainable Development of Critical Infrastructure. American Society of Civil Engineers, 421–429.
24.
LuoLSongMZhongH, et al. (2024) Hierarchical bayesian model updating of a long-span arch bridge considering temperature and traffic loads. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing210: 111152.
25.
MaesKVan MeerbeeckLReyndersEPB, et al. (2022) Validation of vibration-based structural health monitoring on retrofitted railway bridge KW51. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing165: 108380.
26.
MinZSunLDanD (2009) Effect analysis of environmental factors on structural modal parameters of a cable-stayed bridge. Journal of Vibration and Shock28(10): 99–105.
27.
NiYHuaXFanK, et al. (2005) Correlating modal properties with temperature using long-term monitoring data and support vector machine technique. Engineering Structures27(12): 1762–1773.
28.
PeetersBDe RoeckG (2001) One‐year monitoring of the Z24‐Bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics30(2): 149–171.
29.
RainieriCMagalhaesFGargaroD, et al. (2019) Predicting the variability of natural frequencies and its causes by second-order blind identification. Structural Health Monitoring18(2): 486–507.
30.
ShiHWordenKCrossEJ (2018) A regime-switching cointegration approach for removing environmental and operational variations in structural health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing103: 381–397.
31.
SiddiqueABSparlingBFWegnerLD (2007) Assessment of vibration-based damage detection for an integral abutment bridge. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering34(3): 438–452.
32.
SohnHWordenKFarrarCR (2002) Statistical damage classification under changing environmental and operational conditions. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures13(9): 561–574.
33.
Sousa ToméEPimentelMFigueirasJ (2020) Damage detection under environmental and operational effects using cointegration analysis–application to experimental data from a cable-stayed bridge. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing135: 106386.
34.
SunBXieYZhouH, et al. (2024) Hybrid WARIMA-WANN algorithm for data prediction in bridge health monitoring system. Structures69: 107490.
35.
The People’s Republic of China Industry Standard (2011) Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Ordinary Concrete. China Architecture and Building Press.
36.
The People’s Republic of China National Standard (2007) Common Portland Cement. China Standard Press.
37.
WangZYangDHYiTH, et al. (2022) Eliminating environmental and operational effects on structural modal frequency: a comprehensive review. Structural Control and Health Monitoring29(11): e3073.
38.
XiaYHaoHZanardoG, et al. (2006) Long term vibration monitoring of an RC slab: temperature and humidity effect. Engineering Structures28(3): 441–452.
39.
YangS (2020) Research on the Effects of Environmental Temperature on the Elastic Modulus of Concrete and Dynamic Properties of Concrete Beam Bridges. PhD Thesis, Beijing Jiaotong University, CHN.
40.
YangSLiuBLiF (2022) Estimations of the elastic moduli of concrete at different temperatures and humidities by mesomechanics methods. Case Studies in Construction Materials17: e01254.
41.
YuYZongZXiaZ (2008) Effects of environmental temperature and humidity on the dynamic properties of a two-span continuous bridge based on mathematical statistics method. In: 18th National Bridge Academic Conference, Tianjin, China, 1–2 May 2008. China Communications Press, pp. 914–921.
42.
ZhangJSatoTIaiS (2006) Support vector regression for on-line health monitoring of large-scale structures. Structural Safety28(4): 392–406.
43.
ZhouYWangYHanB (2010) Effects of water content of concrete on dynamic performance of RC beams. In: 19th National Structural Engineering Academic Conference, Jinan, China, 5–8 November 2010. Engineering Mechanics Press, pp. 242–245.
