Regarding the damage incurred by aluminum alloy latticed shells under fire loads, a crucial aspect in assessing structural integrity is examining the residual bearing capacity of aluminum alloy gusset (AAG) joints. Consequently, this paper conducted experimental and numerical analyses on the post-fire flexural behavior of AAG joints. Initially, twelve AAG joints underwent post-fire tests, revealing that the failure patterns differed between thin-plate joints (exhibiting block tearing of gusset plates) and thick-plate joints (exhibiting member buckling). Notably, the initial stiffness approximately remained constant, while a trilinear relationship emerged between the ultimate flexural bearing capacity and the maximum post-fire temperature. Subsequently, finite element (FE) analysis was carried out, and the accuracy of FE models was verified by comparing the FE results with the test results. A comprehensive parametric analysis, considering various plate thicknesses, post-fire temperatures, and aluminum alloy brands, was then conducted. Ultimately, employing statistical regression, theoretical equations were formulated to estimate both bending stiffness and bearing capacity for AAG joints after exposure to fire.
AlshaikhIMHAbadelAATuladharR, et al. (2023) Progressive collapse resistance of post-fire cellular beam-column substructures with various web-opening shapes. Structures55: 1874–1893. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.07.003.
2.
ChenZLuJLiuH, et al. (2016) Experimental investigation on the post-fire mechanical properties of structural aluminum alloys 6061-T6 and 7075-T73. Thin-Walled Structures106: 187–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.05.005.
3.
DingYChenYShiY (2016) Progressive collapse analysis of a steel frame subjected to confined explosion and post-explosion fire. Advances in Structural Engineering19(11): 1780–1796. DOI: 10.1177/1369433216649381.
4.
Eurocode 3 (2005a) Design of Steel Structures – Part 1–2: General Rules-Structural Fire Design. Bruxelles, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
5.
Eurocode 3 (2005b) Design of Steel Structures – Part 1–8: Design of JointsBruxelles, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
6.
Eurocode 9 (2007) Design of Aluminium Structures – Part 1–2: Structural Fire DesignBruxelles, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
7.
FanSJiaLLyuX, et al. (2017) Experimental investigation of austenitic stainless steel material at elevated temperatures. Construction and Building Materials155: 267–285. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.047.
8.
Fire-resistance Tests (1999) Elements of building construction. General Requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
9.
GB 50429-2007 (2007) Code for Design of Aluminum Structures. Beijing China: Standards Press of China.
10.
GB/T 3098.6-2000 (2001) Mechanical Properties of Fasteners: Boles, Screws and Studs Made of Stainless-Steel. Beijing China: Standards Press of China.
11.
GuoXXiongZLuoY, et al. (2015a) Experimental investigation on the semi-rigid behaviour of aluminium alloy gusset joints. Thin-Walled Structures87: 30–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2014.11.001.
12.
GuoXXiongZLuoY, et al. (2015b) Application of the component method to aluminum alloy gusset joints. Advances in Structural Engineering18(11): 1931–1946. DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.18.11.1931.
13.
GuoXXiongZLuoY, et al. (2016) Block tearing and local buckling of aluminum alloy gusset joint plates. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering20(2): 820–831. DOI: 10.1007/s12205-015-1614-3.
14.
GuoXZhuSLiuX, et al. (2018) Study on out-of-plane flexural behavior of aluminum alloy gusset joints at elevated temperatures. Thin-Walled Structures123: 452–466. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.11.045.
15.
HanLHSongTYLiS (2023) Post-fire seismic performance of concrete-filled steel tubular column to steel beam joints with blind-bolted connections: experiment and simulation. Engineering Structures283: 115892. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115892.
16.
HuYTangSLGeorgeAK, et al. (2019) Behaviour of stainless steel bolts after exposure to elevated temperatures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research157: 371–385. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.02.021.
17.
HuiCZhuYWangB, et al. (2015) Experimental and theoretical investigation on mechanical performance of aluminum alloy beams in unit curtain walls. Advances in Structural Engineering18(12): 2103–2115. DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.18.12.2103.
18.
HuoJSHanLHWangYC (2010) Behaviour of repaired concrete filled steel tubular column to steel beam joints after exposure to fire. Advances in Structural Engineering13(1): 53–67. DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.13.1.53.
19.
KamalvandMMassumiAHomamiP (2023) Prediction of post-fire seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames. Structures56: 104874. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.104874.
20.
KaufmanJG (ed) (1999) Properties of Aluminum Alloys: Tensile, Creep, and Fatigue Data at High and Low Temperatures. Geauga County, Ohio: ASM international.
21.
KhatibiAAChevaliVFeihS, et al. (2016) Probability analysis of the fire structural resistance of aluminium plate. Fire Safety Journal83: 15–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.04.004.
22.
LiYChengLLeiW, et al. (2023) Microstructures and mechanical property of post-fire grouting sleeve connections considering concrete cover. Construction and Building Materials403: 132578. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132578.
23.
LiuHYingJMengY, et al. (2019a) Flexural behavior of double-and single-layer aluminum alloy gusset-type joints. Thin-Walled Structures144: 106263. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106263.
24.
LiuYLiuHChenZ (2019b) Post-fire mechanical properties of aluminum alloy 6082-T6. Construction and Building Materials196: 256–266. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.237.
25.
LuJChenZLiuH, et al. (2019) Behavior of eccentrically loaded welded hollow spherical joints after elevated-temperature exposure. Advances in Structural Engineering22(6): 1352–1367. DOI: 10.1177/1369433218815432.
26.
MaljaarsJSoetensFSnijderHH (2009a) Local buckling of aluminium structures exposed to fire. Part 1: tests. Thin-Walled Structures47(11): 1404–1417. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2009.02.008.
27.
MaljaarsJSoetensFSnijderHH (2009b) Local buckling of aluminium structures exposed to fire: Part 2: finite element models. Thin-Walled Structures47(11): 1418–1428. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2008.06.003.
28.
MaljaarsJTwiltLSoetensF (2009c) Flexural buckling of fire exposed aluminium columns. Fire Safety Journal44(5): 711–717. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.02.002.
29.
NastriERescignoFMontuoriR, et al. (2021) Modelling non-linear behaviur of aluminium alloy gusset joints for single layer lattices domes. Structures34: 4511–4523. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.049.
30.
QiangXJiangXBijlaardFSK, et al. (2015a) Post-fire behaviour of high strength steel endplate connections—Part 1: experimental study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research108: 82–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.10.028.
31.
QiangXJiangXBijlaardFSK, et al. (2015b) Post-fire behaviour of high strength steel endplate connections—Part 2: numerical study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research108: 94–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.10.027.
32.
RambergWOsgoodWR (1939) Description of Stress-Strain Curves by Three Parameters. Germany, Europe: International Journal of Materials Research, Vol. 656.NACA Report.
33.
RippeCMLattimerBY (2021) Post-fire modeling of aluminum structures using a kinetic driven approach. Fire Safety Journal120: 103132. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103132.
34.
RippeCCaseSLattimerB (2017) Modeling post-fire behavior of aluminum structural components using a maximum temperature approach. Fire Safety Journal91: 561–567. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.041.
35.
SagirogluM (2018) Experimental evaluation of the post-fire behavior of steel T-component in the beam-to-column connection. Fire Safety Journal96: 153–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2018.01.007.
36.
ShiGBanHBaiY, et al. (2013) A novel cast aluminum joint for reticulated shell structures: experimental study and modeling. Advances in Structural Engineering16(6): 1047–1059. DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.16.6.1047.
37.
SongTYHanLH (2014) Post-fire behaviour of concrete-filled steel tubular column to axially and rotationally restrained steel beam joint. Fire Safety Journal69: 147–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.05.023.
38.
SteinHardtO (1971) Aluminum constructions in civil engineering. Aluminum47: 131–139.
39.
TaoZWangXQHassanMK, et al. (2019) Behaviour of three types of stainless steel after exposure to elevated temperatures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research152: 296–311. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.02.020.
40.
TorićNBokoIBurgessIW, et al. (2020) The effect of high-temperature creep on buckling behaviour of aluminium grade EN6082AW T6 columns. Fire Safety Journal112: 102971. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.102971.
41.
WangXQTaoZSongTY, et al. (2014) Stress–strain model of austenitic stainless steel after exposure to elevated temperatures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research99: 129–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.020.
42.
WangYLinSFengF, et al. (2016) Numerical simulation of aluminum alloy 6082-T6 columns failing by overall buckling. Advances in Structural Engineering19(10): 1547–1574. DOI: 10.1177/1369433216643899.
43.
XiongZGuoXLuoY, et al. (2017) Numerical analysis of aluminium alloy gusset joints subjected to bending moment and axial force. Engineering Structures152: 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.005.
44.
ZhaoZChenZYanX, et al. (2016) Simplified numerical method for latticed shells that considers member geometric imperfection and semi-rigid joints. Advances in Structural Engineering19(4): 689–702. DOI: 10.1177/1369433216630123.
45.
ZhaoCWangGZhengT (2022) Research on the hysteretic performance of flower-gusset composite joints for single-layer aluminium alloy lattice shell structures. Advances in Structural Engineering25(1): 171–187. DOI: 10.1177/13694332211046341.
46.
ZhongCChenGFengR, et al. (2023) 6A13-T6 high-strength aluminium alloy beams: test, finite element analysis and design recommendations. Advances in Structural Engineering26(8): 1438–1452. DOI: 10.1177/13694332231161870.
