Mode-I interlaminar fracture behavior of laminated bamboo composites was characterized by mechanical testing in a bonded double cantilever beam configuration. No obvious fiber bridging was observed during the test. At the front of crack tip, nonlinear response was relatively small and negligible. The failure mode of laminated bamboo composites was mainly governed by brittle fracture. Mode-I interlaminar fracture toughness () calculated using the modified beam theory was 501.08 J/m2. Besides, numerical simulation combined with cohesive elements was used to simulate the mode-I interlaminar fracture behavior. A direct method for the determination of cohesive parameters without recourse to iterative fitting was presented in detail. The applicability and effectiveness of this method for interpretation of the fracture behavior of laminated bamboo composites were verified by comparing numerical predictions with experimental results.
ASTM D5528 (2007) Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
3.
BarenblattGI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Advances in Applied Mechanics7: 55–129.
4.
BarileCCasavolaCGambinoB, et al. (2019) Mode-I fracture behavior of CFRPs: numerical model of the experimental results. Materials12(3): 153.
5.
CampilhoRDSGBaneaMDNetoJABP, et al. (2013) Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives44: 48–56.
6.
CampilhoRDSGMouraMFSFPintoAMG, et al. (2009) Modelling the tensile fracture behavior of CFRP scarf repairs. Composites Part B: Engineering40(2): 149–157.
7.
CoureauJ-LMorelSDouradoN (2013) Cohesive zone model and quasibrittle failure of wood: a new light on the adapted specimen geometries for fracture tests. Engineering Fracture Mechanics109: 328–340.
8.
DugdaleDS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids8(2): 100–104.
9.
Fernandez-CanadasLMIvanezISanchez-SaezS (2016) Influence of the cohesive law shape on the composite adhesively-bonded patch repair behaviour. Composites Part B: Engineering91: 414–421.
10.
FlorosISTserpesKILöbelT (2015) Mode-I, mode-II and mixed-mode I+II fracture behavior of composite bonded joints: experimental characterization and numerical simulation. Composites Part B: Engineering78: 459–468.
11.
GdoutosEE (2005) Fracture Mechanics: An Introduction. Dordrecht: Springer.
12.
HuangZChenZHuangD, et al. (2016) The ultimate load-carrying capacity and deformation of laminated bamboo hollow decks: experimental investigation and inelastic analysis. Construction and Building Materials117: 190–197.
13.
HuangDShengBShenY, et al. (2018) An analytical solution for double cantilever beam based on elastic-plastic bilinear cohesive law: analysis for mode I fracture of fibrous composites. Engineering Fracture Mechanics193: 66–76.
14.
JacobsenTKSørensenBF (2001) Mode I intra-laminar crack growth in composite modelling of R-curves from measured bridging laws. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing32(1): 1–11.
15.
KanninenMFPopelarCH (1985) Advanced Fracture Mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
LiGLiC (2015) Assessment of debond simulation and cohesive zone length in a bonded composite joint. Composites Part B: Engineering69: 359–368.
17.
LiSThoulessMDWaasAM, et al. (2005) Use of a cohesive-zone model to analyze the fracture of a fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composite. Composites Science and Technology65(3): 537–549.
18.
LiuHCuiHWenW, et al. (2018) Fatigue characterization of T300/924 polymer composites with voids under tension-tension and compression-compression cyclic loading. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures41(3): 597–610.
19.
MancusiGAscioneF (2013) Performance at collapse of adhesive bonding. Composite Structures96: 256–261.
20.
MouraMFSFCampilhoRAmaroA (2010) Interlaminar and intralaminar fracture characterization of composites under mode I loading. Composite Structures92(1): 144–149.
21.
RabinovitchO (2008) Debonding analysis of fiber-reinforced-polymer strengthened beams: cohesive zone modeling versus a linear elastic fracture mechanics approach. Engineering Fracture Mechanics75(10): 2842–2859.
22.
SaponaraVLMulianaHHaj-AliR, et al. (2002) Experimental and numerical analysis of delamination growth in double cantilever laminated beams. Engineering Fracture Mechanics69(6): 687–699.
23.
SharmaBGatooABockM, et al. (2015a) Engineered bamboo: state of the art. Construction Materials168(2): 57–67.
24.
SharmaBGatooABockM, et al. (2015b) Engineered bamboo for structural applications. Construction and Building Materials81: 66–73.
25.
SisodiaSGamstedtEKEdgrenF, et al. (2015) Effects of voids on quasi-static and tension fatigue behaviour of carbon-fibre composite laminates. Journal of Composite Materials49(17): 2137–2148.
26.
TserpesKIKoumpiasAS (2012) Comparison between a cohesive zone model and a continuum damage model in predicting mode-I fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences83(2): 169–181.
27.
VermaCSChariarVM (2012) Development of layered laminate bamboo composite and their mechanical properties. Composite Part B: Engineering43(3): 1063–1069.
28.
WeiYJiangSXLvQF, et al. (2011) Flexural performance of glued laminated bamboo beams. Advanced Materials Research168–170: 1700–1703.
29.
XiaoYShanBYangR, et al. (2014) Glue Laminated Bamboo (GluBam) for structural applications. Materials and Joints in Timber Structures9: 589–601.
ZhangJWangJYuanZ, et al. (2018) Effect of the cohesive law shape on the modelling of adhesive joints bonded with brittle and ductile adhesives. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives85: 37–43.
32.
ZhouABianYShenY, et al. (2018) Inelastic bending performances of laminated bamboo beams: experimental investigation and analytical study. BioResources13(1): 131–146.
