In this article, a method was proposed to assess damage of the bridge piers subjected to vehicle collision with the help of the detailed numerical model. Nonlinear material constitutive laws considering the strain rate effect were adopted in the models. Validation was performed by comparing the numerical results with the available experimental results in terms of impact force, displacement, and failure pattern. Based on the validated numerical models, the failure process and different damage levels of the piers under impacts were analyzed. The results showed a four-stage failure process as well as four damage levels with the increase of the vehicle impact force. According to the numerical study, a new damage index and the corresponding assessment criterion were defined to assess damage of the impacted pier. A vehicle impact force equation and a half-sine impact impulse were developed for damage index.
Al-ThairyHWangYC (2014) Simplified FE vehicle model for assessing the vulnerability of axially compressed steel columns against vehicle frontal impact. Journal of Constructional Steel Research102(11): 190–203.
2.
AbdelkarimOIElgawadyMA (2017) Performance of bridge piers under vehicle collision. Engineering Structures140: 337–352.
3.
AbdelkarimOIElGawadyMA (2016) Performance of hollow-core FRP-concrete-steel bridge columns subjected to vehicle collision. Engineering Structures123: 517–531.
4.
AflatooniMChanTHTThambiratnamDPThilakarathnaI (2012) Classification of Railway Bridges Based on Criticality and Vulnerability Factors. Engineers Australia.
5.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Load and Resistance Factor Design (AASHTO-LRFD) (1998) LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
6.
BhattiAQKishiNMikamiH (2011) An applicability of dynamic response analysis of shear-failure type RC beams with lightweight aggregate concrete under falling-weight impact loading. Materials and Structures44(1): 221–231.
7.
ButhCEBrackinMSWilliamsWFet al. (2011) Collision loads on bridge piers: phase 2. Report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions. Report, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, March.
ChenLEl-TawilSXiaoY (2016) Reduced models for simulating collisions between trucks and bridge piers. Journal of Bridge Engineering21(6): 04016020.
10.
ChenLEl-TawilSXiaoY (2017) Response spectrum-based method for calculating the reaction force of piers subjected to truck collisions. Engineering Structures150: 852–863.
11.
ChopraAK (2012) Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
ChungCHLeeJGilJH (2014) Structural performance evaluation of a precast prefabricated bridge column under vehicle impact loading. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering10(6): 777–791.
13.
CotsovosDMStathopoulosNDZerisCA (2008) Behavior of RC beams subjected to high rates of concentrated loading. Journal of Structural Engineering134(12): 1839–1851.
14.
CuiKPXiaHXiaCYet al. (2014) Equivalent static force calculation methods for transient impact force of a vehicle in collision with piers. Journal of Vibration and Shock33(4): 48–69 (in Chinese).
15.
DemartinoCWuJGXiaoY (2017) Response of shear-deficient reinforced circular RC columns under lateral impact loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering109: 196–213.
16.
El-TawilSSeverinoEFonsecaP (2005) Vehicle collision with bridge piers. Journal of Bridge Engineering10(3): 345–353.
17.
FEA-MISESL (2015). Available at: www.misesl.com (accessed 1 December 2015).
18.
FeyerabendM (1988) Hard transverse impacts on steel beams and reinforced concrete beams. PhD Thesis, University of Karlsruhe (TH), Karlsruhe.
19.
FujikakeKLiBSoeunS (2009) Impact response of reinforced concrete beam and its analytical evaluation. Journal of Structural Engineering135(8): 938–950.
20.
GB 50010-2010:2010 (2010). Code for design of concrete structures (in Chinese).
21.
KishiNMikamiHMatsuokaKGet al. (2002) Impact behavior of shear-failure-type RC beams without shear rebar. International Journal of Impact Engineering27(9): 955–968.
MadurapperumaMAKMWijeyewickremaAC (2012) Performance of reinforced concrete columns impacted by water-borne shipping containers. Advances in Structural Engineering15(8): 1307–1328.
24.
MadurapperumaMAKMWijeyewickremaAC (2013) Response of reinforced concrete columns impacted by tsunami dispersed 20’ and 40’ shipping container. Engineering Structures56: 1631–1644.
25.
PhamTMHaoH (2017) Plastic hinges and inertia forces in RC beams under impact loads. International Journal of Impact Engineering103: 1–11.
26.
SaatciSVecchioFJ (2009) Effects of shear mechanisms on impact behavior of reinforced concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal106(1): 78–86.
27.
ShakirASGuanZWJonesSW (2016) Lateral impact response of the concrete filled steel tube columns with and without CFRP strengthening. Engineering Structures116: 148–162.
28.
SharmaHHurlebausSGardoniP (2008) Development of a bridge bumper to protect bridge girders from overheight vehicle impacts. Computer-Aided Civil Infrastructure and Engineering23(6): 415–426.
29.
SharmaHHurlebausSGardoniP (2012) Performance-based response evaluation of reinforced concrete columns subject to vehicle impact. International Journal of Impact Engineering43: 52–62.
30.
SharmaHGardoniPHurlebausS (2014) Probabilistic demand model and performance-based fragility estimates for rc column subject to vehicle collision. Engineering Structures74: 86–95.
31.
XuLJLuXZGuanHet al. (2013) Finite-element and simplified models for collision simulation between overheight trucks and bridge superstructure. Journal of Bridge Engineering18(18): 1140–1151.
32.
YuJJonesN (1989) Numerical simulation of a clamped beam under impact loading. Computers & Structures32(2): 281–293.
33.
ZhouDYLiRWWangJet al. (2017) Study on impact behavior and impact force of bridge pier subjected to vehicle collision. Shock and Vibration18: 7085392.
