A new sampling strategy is proposed to improve the robustness and efficiency of the Kriging-based response surface method. In the initial stage, the number-theoretic method is utilized to generate deterministic initial design samples, which are further optimized by an interpolation method. In the sequential iterative process, a new sampling criterion called reliability infill sampling criterion is proposed. Besides, a more reasonable two-process strategy is suggested where the iterative process is divided into two sub-processes using different sampling criteria. The proposed method ensures that the approximation can be accurately and efficiently fitted near the limit state. The numerical examples and the applications in structural reliability indicate the improved accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method.
AlibrandiUAlaniAMRicciardiG (2015) A new sampling strategy for SVM-based response surface for structural reliability analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics41: 1–12.
2.
BhattacharjeePRamesh KumarKJanardhan ReddyTA (2013) Structural safety evaluation using modified Latin hypercube sampling technique. International Journal of Performability Engineering9: 515–522.
3.
BorriASperanziniE (1997) Structural reliability analysis using a standard deterministic finite element code. Structural Safety19: 361–382.
4.
BucherCGBourgundU (1990) A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Structural Safety7: 57–66.
ChojaczykAATeixeiraAPNevesLC. (2015) Review and application of artificial neural networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures. Structural Safety52: 78–89.
8.
DamblinGCoupletMIoossB (2013) Numerical studies of space-filling designs: optimization of Latin hypercube samples and subprojection properties. Journal of Simulation7: 276–289.
9.
DasPKZhengY (2000) Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics15: 309–315.
10.
EchardBGaytonNLemaireM (2011) AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation. Structural Safety33: 145–154.
11.
EnevoldsenIFaberMHSorensenJD (1994) Adaptive response surface techniques in reliability estimation. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on structural safety and reliability (ICOSSAR’93) part 2 (of 3), Innsbruck, 9–13 August, pp. 1257–1264. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
12.
GavinHPYauSC (2008) High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis. Structural Safety30: 162–179.
HaceneSMABGhomariFSchoefsF. (2014) Probabilistic modelling of compressive strength of concrete using response surface methodology and neural networks. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering39: 4451–4460.
15.
JinWLYuanXX (2007) Response surface method based on LS-SVM for structural reliability analysis. Journal of Zhejiang University41: 44–47, 108.
16.
KaitaiF (1996) Application of Number-Theoretic Methods in Statistics. Beijing, China: Science Press.
17.
KaymazIMcMahonCA (2005) A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics20: 11–17.
18.
KiureghianAD (2000) The geometry of random vibrations and solutions by FORM and SORM. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics15: 81–90.
19.
KrishnamurthyT (2003) Response surface approximation with augmented and compactly supported radial basis functions. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Norfolk, VA, 7–10 April.
20.
KrishnamurthyT (2005) Comparison of response surface construction methods for derivative estimation using moving least squares, Kriging and radial basis functions. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Austin, TX, 18–21 April, pp. 241–268. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
MartinJDSimpsonTW (2003) A study on the use of Kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Chicago, IL, 2–6 September, pp. 567–576. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
23.
NietoPJGGarcia-GonzaloELasherasFS. (2015) Hybrid PSO–SVM-based method for forecasting of the remaining useful life for aircraft engines and evaluation of its reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety138: 219–231.
24.
RajashekharMREllingwoodBR (1993) A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis. Structural Safety12: 205–220.
25.
RomeroVJSwilerLPGiuntaAA (2004) Construction of response surfaces based on progressive-lattice-sampling experimental designs with application to uncertainty propagation. Structural Safety26: 201–219.
26.
SasenaM (2002) Flexibility and Efficiency Enhancements for Constrained Global Design Optimization with Kriging Approximations. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
27.
SchonlauM (1997) Computer Experiments and Global Optimization. Waterloo, ON, Canada: University of Waterloo.
28.
ZhaoG (1996) Reliability Theory and Its Applications for Engineering Structures. Dalian, China: Dalian University of Technology Press.
