The Queens’ gambit: Women leadership,gender expectations,and interstate conflict

Abstract

If more women were put in states’ leadership positions, would there be fewer militarised interstate disputes? The findings of this study suggest an affirmative answer to this question but for reasons that are different from the arguments associating women with peace. We derive our expectations from the ‘role incongruity’ perspective detailing the impact of gender stereotypes on individuals’ assessment of leaders and their decisions. Due to gendered expectations of leadership, ‘role incongruity’ can contribute to the escalation of militarised disputes in state dyads where one leader is male and the other is female, but its impact is mitigated in joint women-led state dyads. Our contributions to the scholarship on gender and conflict lie in illuminating theoretically how the threats arising from gender stereotypes can be reduced in all-women dyads and testing this relationship on state dyads between years 1966 and 2014.

Keywords

foreign policy gender interstate conflict leadership militarised disputes peace and conflict women

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen

(2005) Let’s put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong. Conflict Management and Peace Science 22(4): 327–339.

Albright

(2016) My undiplomatic moment. The New York Times, 12 February. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/13/opinion/madeleine-albright-my-undiplomatic-moment.html (accessed 27 December 2023).

Asher

(2019) Barack Obama: Women are better leaders than me. BBC, 16 December. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-50805822 (accessed 1 December 2022).

Banaji

Hardin

(1996) Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science 7(3): 136–141.

Barnes

O’Brien

(2018) Defending the realm: The appointment of female defense ministers worldwide. American Journal of Political Science 62(2): 355–368.

Bas

Schub

(2016) How uncertainty about war outcomes affects war onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60(6): 1099–1128.

Bashevkin

(2018) Women as Foreign Policy Leaders: National Security and Gender Politics in Superpower America. New York: Oxford University Press.

Beck

Katz

Tucker

(1998) Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1260–1288.

Bian

Leslie

S-J

Murphy

, et al. (2018) Messages about brilliance undermine women’s interest in educational and professional opportunities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 76: 404–420.

10.

Bjarnegard

Melander

(2011) Disentangling gender, peace, and democratization: The negative effects of militarized masculinity. Journal of Gender Studies 20(2): 131–154.

11.

Browne

(2022) Meta’s Sheryl Sandberg: ‘No two countries run by women would ever go to war’. CNBC, 3 March. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/08/sheryl-sandberg-on-russia-ukraine-women-led-countries-wouldnt-go-to-war.html (accessed 1 December 2022).

12.

Burns

Bowling

(2021) Signaling woman and leader: Navigating the double bind as a foreign policy decisionmaker. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 42(4): 332–351.

13.

Caprioli

(2000) Gendered conflict. Journal of Peace Research 37(1): 53–68.

14.

Caprioli

(2005) Primed for violence: The role of gender inequality in predicting internal conflict. International Studies Quarterly 49: 161–178.

15.

Caprioli

Boyer

(2001) Gender, violence, and international crisis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45: 503–518.

16.

Caprioli

Trumbore

(2003) Identifying rogue states and testing their interstate conflict behavior. European Journal of International Relations 9(3): 377–406.

17.

Carli

Eagly

(2017) Leadership and gender. In: Antonakis

Day

(eds) The Nature of Leadership. New York: Sage, pp.258.

18.

Clarke

(2005) The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research. Conflict Management and Peace Science 22(4): 341–352.

19.

Crescenzi

Kathman

Kleinberg

, et al. (2012) Reliability, reputation, and alliance formation. International Studies Quarterly 56(2): 259–274.

20.

DeVotta

(2004) Sri Lanka in 2003: Seeking to consolidate peace. Asian Survey 44(1): 49–55.

21.

Dodge

Gilroy

Fenzel

MLL

(2005) Requisite management characteristics revisited: Two decades later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10: 253–264.

22.

Dube

Harish

(2017) Queens. NBER Working Paper. No. 23337. April. Available at https://www.nber.org/papers/w23337 (accessed 1 December 2022).

23.

Dworschak

(2023) Bias mitigation in empirical peace and conflict studies: A short primer on posttreatment variables. Journal of Peace Research. Epub ahead of print 21 April. DOI: 10.1177/00223433221145531.

24.

Eagly

Karau

(2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109(3): 573–598.

25.

Firth

(1993) Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 80(1): 27–38.

26.

Gartzke

(2007) The capitalist peace. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 166–191.

27.

Genovese

Steckenrider

(2013) Women as political leaders: Studies in gender and governing. New York: Routledge.

28.

Gibler

Sarkees

(2004.) Measuring alliances: The correlates of war formal interstate alliance dataset, 1816–2000. Journal of Peace Research 41(2): 211–222.

29.

Glausiusz

(2017) Would the world be more peaceful if there were more women leaders? The Present, 6 November. Available at: https://bigthink.com/the-present/would-the-world-be-more-peaceful-if-there-were-more-women-leaders/ (accessed 3 December 2022).

30.

Günhan

Röver

Friede

(2020) Random-effects meta-analysis of few studies involving rare events. Research Synthesis Methods 11(1): 74–90.

31.

Gupte

(1992) Mother India: A Political Biography of Indira Gandhi. New Delhi, India: Penguin Books.

32.

Heinze

Schemper (2002) A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 21(16): 2409–2419.

33.

Hellmann- Rajanayagam

(1994) The Tamil Tigers: Armed Struggle for Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

34.

Horowitz

Stam

Ellis

(2015) Why Leaders Fight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Hoyt

Murphy

(2016) Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 27: 387–399.

36.

Hudson

Leidle

(2017) The Hillary Doctrine: Sex and American Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.

37.

Inglehart

Haerpfer

Moreno

, et al. (eds) (2022) World Values Survey: All Rounds – Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat.

38.

Inter-Parliamentary Union (1987) Distribution of seats between men and women in national assemblies. Reports and Documents, no. 14. Geneva: International Centre for Parliamentary Documentation.

39.

Inzlicht

Ben-Zeev

(2000) A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science 11(5): 365–371.

40.

Ispahani

(1992) India’s Role in Sri Lanka’s Ethnic Conflict in Levite

Ariel

et al. (eds) Foreign Military Intervention: The Dynamics of Protracted Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.209–239.

41.

Jalalzai

(2013) Shattered, Cracked, or Firmly Intact? Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

42.

Jenkins

(2013) How Margaret Thatcher’s Falklands gamble paid off. The Guardian, 9 April. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/09/margaret-thatcher-falklands-gamble (accessed 27 December 2023).

43.

Jones

Bremer

Singer

(1996) Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15: 163–213.

44.

Joshi

Son

Roh

(2015) When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewords. Academic Management Journal 58: 1516–1545.

45.

Keele

Stevenson

Elwert

(2020) The causal interpretation of estimated associations in regression models. Political Science Research and Methods 8(1): 1–13.

46.

Koch

Fulton

(2011) In the defense of women: Gender, office holding, and national security policy in established democracies. The Journal of Politics 73(1): 1–16.

47.

Krook

O’Brien

(2012) All the president’s men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. The Journal of Politics 74(3): 840–855.

48.

Kumari

(2021) Indira Gandhi: Paradox of a prime minister. Feminist India, 26 May. Available at: https://feminisminindia.com/2021/05/26/indira-gandhi-first-woman-prime-minister-profile/ (accessed 27 December 2023).

49.

Lasher

(2005) Madeline albright, gender, and foreign policy-making. Journal of Political Science 33(1): 39–83.

50.

Lippman

(1999) State Dept. Miscalculated on Kosovo. Washington Post, April 7: A1.

51.

Breuning

(2014) Gender and generosity: Does women’s representation affect development cooperation? Politics, Groups, and Identities 23: 313–330.

52.

Mansournia

Geroldinger

Greenland

et al. (2018) Separation in logistic regression: causes, consequences, and control. American Journal of Epidemiology 187(4): 864–870.

53.

McDermott

Johnson

Cowden

, et al. (2007) Testosterone and aggression in a simulated crisis game. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614(1): 15–33.

54.

McGrath

(2015) Estimating onsets of binary events in panel data. Political Analysis 23(4): 534–549.

55.

Malhotra

(1989) Indira Gandhi. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

56.

Maoz

(1997) The controversy over the democratic peace: Rearguard action or cracks in the wall? International Security 22(1): 162–198.

57.

Melander

(2005) Gender equality and intrastate armed conflict. International Studies Quarterly 49: 695–714.

58.

Moore

(2015) Margaret Thatcher: The Authorized Biography: Volume I: from Grantham to the Falklands. New York: Vintage (Reprint edition).

59.

Nunn

(2002) Thatcher, Politics and Fantasy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

60.

Nyrup

Bramwell

(2020) Who governs? A new global dataset on members of cabinets. American Political Science Review 1144: 1366–1374.

61.

O’Brien

(2015) Rising to the top: Gender, political performance, and party leadership in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 59(4): 1022–1039.

62.

Paddock

(2001) A sistershood of strength in Southeast Asia. Los Angeles Times, 22 August. Available at: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-aug-22-mn-36852-story.html (accessed 2 December 2022).

63.

Palmer

McManus

D’Orazio

, et al. (2020) The MID5 dataset, 2011-2014: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Working paper. Available at: https://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/MIDs/mid-5-data-and-supporting-materials.zip/view (accessed 27 December 2023).

64.

Perwita

AAB

Meilisa

(2018) Co-operative maritime diplomacy: The resolution of the Philippines – Indonesia maritime border dispute (1994-2014). Andalas Journal of International Studies 7: 105. Available at: http://ajis.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/ajis/article/viewFile/81/105 (accessed 2 December 2022).

65.

Piccone

(2017) Democracy, gender equality, and security. The Brookings Institute Democracy and Security Dialogue Policy Brief Series, September. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/democracy-gender-equality-and-security/ (accessed 27 December 2023).

66.

Pillai

(2012) Indo – Sri Lankan Pact of 1964 and the problem of statelessness – a critique. Afro Asian Journal of Social Sciences 3(3.1): 5313. Available at: http://onlineresearchjournals.com/aajoss/art/82.pdf (accessed 27 December 2023).

67.

Plümper

Troeger

(2007) Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis 15(2): 124–139.

68.

Post

Sen

(2020) Why can’t a woman be more like a man? Female leaders in crisis bargaining. International Interactions 46(1): 1–27.

69.

Powell

Mukazhanova-Powell

(2019) Demonstrating credentials? Female executives, women’s status. And the Use of Force. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 40: 241–262.

70.

Purie

(1979) I admire Indira Gandhi and we understood each other very well: Sirimavo Bandaranaike. India Today, January 31, https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/neighbours/story/19790131-i-admire-indira-gandhi-and-we-understood-each-other-very-well-sirimavo-bandaranaike-821833-2014-12-24 (accessed December 14, 2014).

71.

Raghavan

(2012) Soldiers, statesmen, and India’s security policy. India Review 12(2): 116–133.

72.

Ramkumar

(2022) Pencil mightier than the sward: How an Indian state resisted Indira Gandhi. Wilson Center, 15 March. Available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/pencil-mightier-sword-how-indian-state-resisted-indira-gandhi (accessed 1 December 2022).

73.

Regan

Paskeviciute

(2003) Women’s access to politics and peaceful states. Journal of Peace Research 40(3): 287–302.

74.

Rettie

(2000) Sirima Bandaranaike. The Guardian, 10 October. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2000/oct/11/guardianobituaries (accessed 27 December 2023).

75.

Reuters (2008) Factbox – India’s role in Sri Lanka’s civil war. 17 October. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2000/oct/11/guardianobituaries

76.

Richter

(1987) Mrs. Gandhi’s Neighborhood: Indian foreign policy toward neighboring countries. Journal of Asian and African Studies 22(3): 249–264.

77.

Rousseau

Gelpi

Reiter

, et al. (1996) Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace, 1918-88. The American Political Science Review 90(3): 513.

78.

Rudman

Glick

(2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues 57: 743–762.

79.

Schramm

Stark

(2020) Peacemakers or iron ladies? A cross-national study of gender and international conflict. Security Studies 29(3): 515–548.

80.

Schroeder

(2017) When security dominates the agenda: The influence of ongoing security threats on female representation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(3): 564–589.

81.

Schwartz

Blair

(2020) Do women make more credible threats: Gender stereotypes, audience costs, and crisis bargaining. International Organization 74(4): 872–895.

82.

Skard

(2014) Women of Power: Half a Century of Female Presidents and Prime Ministers Worldwide. Bristol: Policy Press.

83.

Stangor

Lynch

Duan

, et al. (1992) Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(2): 207–218.

84.

Steinberg

(2005) Indira Gandhi: The relationship between personality profile and leadership style. Political Psychology 26(5): 755–789.

85.

Tajfel

(1979) Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 18(2): 183–190.

86.

Ta-Johnson

Keels

Bayram

(2022) How women promote peace: Gender composition, duration, and frames in conflict resolution. International Interactions 48: 1089–1120.

87.

Thailakarathne

(2007) Glimpse of history from ANCL archives: Sirimavo R.D. Bandaranaike – an outstanding Stateswoman. Sunday Observer, 4 March. Available at: http://archives.sundayobserver.lk/2007/03/04/imp04.asp (accessed 27 December 2023).

88.

The Hindu (2009) Love, hated, admired: The enduring legacy of Indira Gandhi. The Hindu, 29 October. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Loved-hated-admired-The-enduring-legacy-of-Indira-Gandhi/article16889145.ece# (accessed 27 December 2023).

89.

Tomasson

(1989) India in transition: Issues of political economy in a plural society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

90.

UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2015) World fertility report. Available at https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Feb/un_2015_worldfertilityreport.pdf (accessed 27 December 2023).

91.

Upadhyay

Gipson

Withers

, et al. (2014) Women’s empowerment and fertility: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 115: 111–120.

92.

Vijeyarasa

(2022) The woman president: Leadership, law and legacy for women based on experiences from south and southeast Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

93.

Ward

Greenhill

Bakke

(2010) The perils of policy by p-value: Predicting civil conflicts. Journal of Peace Research 47(4): 363–375.

94.

Weeks

(2014) Dictators at War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

95.

Welch

(1997) Remember the Falklands? Missed lessons of a misunderstood war. International Journal 52(3): 483–507.

96.

Westendorf

(2018) Peace negotiations in the political marketplace: The implications of women’s exclusion in the Sudan-South Sudan peace process. Australian Journal of International Affairs 72(5): 433–454.

97.

Zorn

(2005) A solution to separation in binary response models. Political Analysis 13(2): 157–170.