Rebel diplomacy in civil wars is an emerging research area, and we do not know the extent to which it contributes to the type of civil war termination. This article posits rebel diplomacy as the practices of communication and persuasion intended to generate external and internal pressures which make the government and rebel more amenable to each others’ demands. The implication of this theoretical argument is that the government and rebel groups would be able to find compromises and settle civil wars in a negotiated peace agreement. Findings from the analysis of 136 civil wars since 1950 support the theoretical argument. This finding is robust in alternative model specification and after modelling the endogenous effect of factors that explain the rebel use of diplomacy.
ArıB (2022) Peace negotiations in civil conflicts: A new dataset. Journal of Conflict Resolution67(1): 150–177.
2.
BakDLeeH (2021) Intrastate armed conflict termination and foreign direct investment. Foreign Policy Analysis17: oraa027.
3.
Balch-LindsayDEnterlineAJJoyceKA (2008) Third-party intervention and the civil war process. Journal of Peace Research45(3): 345–363.
4.
BallentineKShermanJ (2003) (eds) The political economy of armed conflict: Beyond greed and grievance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
5.
BerridgeGR (2015) Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 4th edn.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BöhmeltT (2010) The effectiveness of tracks of diplomacy strategies in third-party interventions. Journal of Peace Research47(2): 167–178.
7.
BongardPSomerJ (2011) Monitoring armed non-state actor compliance with humanitarian norms: A look at international mechanisms and the Geneva Call Deed of Commitment. International Review of the Red Cross93(883): 673–706.
8.
Boutros-GhaliB (1992) An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping. International Relations11(3): 201–218.
9.
BrandtPTMasonTDGursesM, et al. (2008) When and how the fighting stops: Explaining the duration and outcome of civil wars. Defence and Peace Economics19(6): 415–434.
10.
ClaytonG (2013) Relative rebel strength and the onset and outcome of civil war mediation. Journal of Peace Research50(5): 609–622.
11.
CogginsBL (2015) Rebel diplomacy: Theorizing violent non-state actors’ strategic use of talk. In: ArjonaAKasfirNMampillyZ (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.98–118.
12.
CollierPHoefflerA (1998) On economic causes of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers50(4): 563–573.
13.
CollierPHoefflerA (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers56(4): 563–595.
14.
CollierPHoefflerASöderbomM (2004) On the duration of civil war. Journal of Peace Research41(3): 253–273.
15.
ConradJMGreeneKTWalshJI, et al. (2019) Rebel natural resource exploitation and conflict duration. Journal of Conflict Resolution63(3): 591–616.
16.
CornellSE (2007) Narcotics and armed conflict: Interaction and implications. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism30(3): 207–227.
17.
CunninghamDE (2006) Veto players and civil war duration. American Journal of Political Science50(4): 875–892.
18.
CunninghamDEGleditschKSSalehyanI (2009) It takes two: A dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(4): 570–597.
19.
CunninghamDEGleditschKSSalehyanI (2013) Non-state actors in civil wars: A new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(5): 516–531.
20.
De RouenKRSobekD (2004) The dynamics of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Peace Research41(3): 303–320.
21.
DeRouenKBercovitchJPospiesznaP (2011) Introducing the civil wars mediation (CWM) dataset. Journal of Peace Research48(5): 663–672.
22.
DownesAB (2006) Desperate times, desperate measures: The causes of civilian victimization in war. International Security30(4): 152–195.
23.
DoyleMWSambanisN (2006) Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
FazalTM (2018) Wars of Law: Unintended Consequences in the Regulation of Armed Conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
FearonJD (1995) Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization49(3): 379–414.
26.
FearonJD (2004) Why do some civil wars last so much longer than others?Journal of Peace Research41(3): 275–301.
27.
FearonJDLaitinDD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
28.
FortnaVP (2008) Does Peacekeeping Work?: Shaping Belligerents’ Choices after Civil War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
FortnaVP (2015) Do terrorists win? Rebels’ use of terrorism and civil war outcomes. International Organization69(3): 519–556.
30.
GeorgeAL (1991) Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
31.
GleditschKSHugSSchubigerLI, et al. (2018) International conventions and nonstate actors: Selection, signaling, and reputation effects. Journal of Conflict Resolution62(2): 346–380.
32.
GreeneWH (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. Delhi, India Pearson Education.
33.
GreigJMMasonTDHamnerJ (2018) Win, lose, or draw in the fog of civil war. Conflict Management and Peace Science35(5): 523–543.
GursesM (2015) Transnational ethnic kin and civil war outcomes. Political Research Quarterly68(1): 142–153.
36.
HartzellCHoddieMRothchildD (2001) Stabilizing the peace after civil war: An investigation of some key variables. International Organization55(1): 183–208.
37.
HauensteinMJoshiM (2020) Remaining seized of the matter: Un resolutions and peace implementation. International Studies Quarterly64(4): 834–844.
38.
HegerLLJungDF (2017) Negotiating with rebels: The effect of rebel service provision on conflict negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution61(6): 1203–1229.
39.
HofmannC (2006) Engaging non-state armed groups in humanitarian action. International Peacekeeping13(3): 396–409.
40.
HowardLMStarkA (2018) How civil wars end: The international system, norms, and the role of external actors. International Security42(3): 127–171.
41.
HuangR (2016) Rebel diplomacy in civil war. International Security40(4): 89–126.
42.
HuangRSullivanPL (2021) Arms for education? External support and rebel social services. Journal of Peace Research58(4): 794–808.
43.
JoHAlleyJKParkY, et al. (2021) Signaling restraint: International engagement and rebel groups’ commitment to international law. International Interactions47: 928–954.
44.
JonesBTMattiacciE (2017) A manifesto, in 140 characters or fewer: Social media as a tool of rebel diplomacy. British Journal of Political Science49: 739–761.
45.
JoshiM (2010) Post-civil war democratization: Promotion of democracy in post-civil war states, 1946–2005. Democratization17(5): 826–855.
46.
JoshiM (2015) Comprehensive peace agreement implementation and reduction in neonatal, infant and under-5 mortality rates in post-armed conflict states, 1989-2012. BMC International Health and Human Rights15: 27.
47.
JoshiMOlssonL (2021) War termination and women’s political rights. Social Science Research94: 102523.
48.
JoshiMQuinnJM (2017) Implementing the peace: The aggregate implementation of comprehensive peace agreements and peace duration after intrastate armed conflict. British Journal of Political Science47(4): 869–892.
49.
JoshiMQuinnJM (2020) Civil war termination and foreign direct investment, 1989–2012. Conflict Management and Peace Science37(4): 451–470.
50.
KalyvasSN (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
KalyvasSNBalcellsL (2010) International system and technologies of rebellion: How the end of the Cold War shaped internal conflict. American Political Science Review104(3): 415–429.
52.
KanetRE (2006) The superpower quest for empire: The Cold War and soviet support for ‘wars of national liberation’. Cold War History6(3): 331–352.
KeohaneRONyeJS (1987) Power and Interdependence revisited. International Organization41(4): 725–753.
55.
KissingerH (1994) Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
56.
KreutzJ (2010) How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination dataset. Journal of Peace Research47(2): 243–250.
57.
LeiraH (2016) A conceptual history of diplomacy. In: ConstantinouCMKerrPSharpP (eds) SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy. London: SAGE Publishing, pp.28–38.
58.
LieberfeldD (2002) Evaluating the contributions of track-two diplomacy to conflict termination in South Africa, 1984-90. Journal of Peace Research39(3): 355–372.
59.
LoyleCEBestvaterSE (2019) #rebel: Rebel communication strategies in the age of social media. Conflict Management and Peace Science36(6): 570–590.
60.
LoyleCECunninghamKGHuangR, et al. (2021) New directions in rebel governance research. Perspectives on Politics21: 264–276.
61.
Mac GintyRRichmondOP (2013) The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly34(5): 763–783.
62.
McClintockRM (1965) The art of diplomacy: A lecture delivered at the Naval War College on 17 September 1964.Naval War College Review17(5): 56–71.
63.
MaekawaWArıBGizelisTI (2019) UN involvement and civil war peace agreement implementation. Public Choice178(3–4): 397–416.
64.
MampillyZ (2011) Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
MasonTDWeingartenJPFettPJ (1999) Win, lose, or draw: Predicting the outcome of civil wars. Political Research Quarterly52(2): 239–268.
67.
MattesMSavunB (2010) Information, agreement design, and the durability of civil war settlements. American Journal of Political Science54(2): 511–524.
68.
MelissenJ (2005) The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice. In: MelissenJ (ed.) The New Public Diplomacy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.3–27.
69.
MenardS (2002) An Introduction to Logistic Regression Diagnostics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.
70.
MukherjeeB (2006) Does third-party enforcement or domestic institutions promote enduring peace after civil wars? Policy lessons from an empirical test. Foreign Policy Analysis2(4): 405–430.
71.
MuniSD (2012) Bringing the Maoists down from the hills: India’s role. In: Von EinsiedelSMaloneDMPradhanS (eds) Nepal in Transition: From People’s War to Fragile Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.313–331.
72.
NorrevikSSarwariM (2021) Third-party regime type and civil war duration. Journal of Peace Research58(6): 1256–1270.
73.
ParisR (2010) Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies36(2): 337–365.
74.
PerkinsE (2006) Mr. Ambassador: Warrior for Peace. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
75.
PetterssonTHögbladhSÖbergM (2019) Organized violence, 1989–2018 and peace agreements. Journal of Peace Research56(4): 589–603.
76.
PodderS (2017) Understanding the legitimacy of armed groups: A relational perspective. Small Wars and Insurgencies28(4–5): 686–708.
77.
PutnamRD (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization42(3): 427–460.
78.
QuinnJJoshiMMelanderE (2019) One dyadic peace leads to another? Conflict systems, terminations, and net reduction in fighting groups. International Studies Quarterly63(4): 863–875.
79.
ReganPM (2002) Third-party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution46(1): 55–73.
80.
ReganPMAydinA (2006) Diplomacy and other forms of intervention in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(5): 736–756.
81.
RenoW (2015) Lost in transitions: Civil war termination in Sub-Saharan Africa. The American Historical Review120(5): 1798–1810.
SambanisN (2004) What is civil war? Conceptual and empirical complexities of an operational definition. Journal of Conflict Resolution48(6): 814–858.
84.
SawyerKCunninghamKGReedW (2017) The role of external support in civil war termination. Journal of Conflict Resolution61(6): 1174–1202.
85.
SullivanPLKarrethJ (2015) The conditional impact of military intervention on internal armed conflict outcomes. Conflict Management and Peace Science32(3): 269–288.
86.
The World Bank (2019) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
87.
TillyC (1977) From Mobilization to Revolution. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
88.
WalterBF (1997) The critical barrier to civil war settlement. International Organization51(3): 335–364.
89.
WalterBF (1999) Designing transitions from civil war: Demobilization, democratization, and commitments to peace. International Security24(1): 127–153.
90.
WiegandKRowlandEKeelsE (2021) Third-party knowledge and success in civil war mediation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations23(1): 3–21.
91.
WimmerACedermanLEMinB (2009) Ethnic politics and armed conflict: A configurational analysis of a new global data set. American Sociological Review74(2): 316–337.
