A growing literature has started to explore the relationship between religious dimensions and the escalation, duration, and termination of armed conflicts. This study explores the conditions for negotiated settlements. The author argues that if the belligerents' demands are explicitly anchored in a religious tradition, they will come to perceive the conflicting issues as indivisible, and the conflict will be less likely to be settled through negotiations. Utilizing unique data on the primary parties' religious demands and identities, all intrastate conflict-dyads in the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP), 1989-2003, are examined. The study finds that if governments or rebel-groups have made explicit religious claims, these conflict-dyads are significantly less likely than others to be terminated through negotiated settlement. By contrast, whether the primary parties come from different religious traditions does not affect the chances for negotiated settlement.
Albin, Cecilia.1991. Negotiating indivisible goods: The case of Jerusalem. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations13 (1): 45-75.
2.
Bartholomeusz, Tessa J.2002. In defense of dharma: Just-war ideology in Buddhist Sri Lanka. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
3.
Bercovitch, Jacob, and Karl R. DeRouen Jr.2005. Mediation in ethnic civil war. Civil Wars7 (1): 98-116.
4.
Collier, Paul, and Anke Hoeffler.2002. Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers56:563-95.
5.
Collier, Paul, Anke Hoeffler, and Måns Söderbom.2004. On the duration of civil war. Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 253-73.
6.
Crocker, Chester, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall.2004. Taming intractable conflict: Mediation in the hardest cases. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.
7.
Cunningham, David.2005. The effect of type of external intervention on the duration of civil war. Paper prepared for the presentation at the 46th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, March 1-5, Honolulu, HI.
8.
DeRouen, Karl R., Jr. , and David Sobek.2004. The dynamics of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Peace Research41 (3): 303-20.
9.
Ellingsen, Tanja.2000. Colorful community or ethnic witches' brew? Multiethnicity and domestic conflict during and after the cold war. Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (2): 228-49.
10.
———. 2001. Cultures in conflict: Old stories or new threats? The patterns of cultural armed conflicts, 1946-99. Paper prepared for PRIO/Uppsala University/DECRG High-Level Scientific Conference , ``Identifying Wars: Systematic Conflict Research and Its Utility in Conflict Resolution and Prevention,'' June 8-9, Uppsala, Sweden.
11.
Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin .2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Journal of Political Science97 (1): 75-90.
12.
Forsberg, Erika.2005. Conflict diffusion: Ethnic kin as a transmitter of internal conflict. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, March 1-5, Honolulu, HI.
13.
Fox, Jonathan.1997. The salience of religious issues in ethnic conflicts: A large-N study. Nationalism & Ethnic Politics3 (3): 1-19.
14.
———. 2004a. Religion and state failure: An examination of the extent and magnitude of religious conflict from 1950 to 1996. International Political Science Review25 (1): 55-76.
15.
———. 2004b. Religion, civilization, and civil war: 1945 through the millennium. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
16.
Frydenlund, Iselin.2005. The Sangha and its relation to the peace process in Sri Lanka. Oslo, Norway: International Peace Research Institute.
17.
Gilady, Lilach, and Bruce M. Russett .2002. Peacemaking and conflict resolution. In Handbook of international relations, ed. W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons, 392-408. London : Sage.
18.
Goddard, Stacie E.2006. Uncommon ground: Indivisible territory and the politics of legitimacy. International Organization60:35-68.
19.
Gopin, Marc. 2000. Between Eden and Armageddon: The future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Gurr, Ted Robert.1994. Peoples against states: Ethnopolitical conflict and the changing world system. International Studies Quarterly38:347-77.
21.
Harris, Elizabeth J.2007. The cost of peace: Buddhists and conflict transformation in Sri Lanka. In Can faiths make peace? Holy wars and the resolution of religious conflicts, ed. P. Broadhead and D. Keown.London: I.B. Tauris.
22.
Hasenclever, Andreas, and Volker Rittberger.2000. Does religion make a difference? Theoretical approaches to the impact of faith on political conflict. Millennium: Journal of International Studies29 (3): 641-74.
23.
Hassner, Ron E.2003. ``To halve and to hold'': Conflict over sacred space and the problem of indivisibility. Security Studies12 (4): 1-33.
24.
———. 2006-2007. The path to intractability: Time and the entrenchment of territorial disputes. International Security31 (3): 107-38.
25.
Huntington, Samuel P.1993. The clash of civilizations?Foreign A fairs72 (3): 22-49.
26.
———. 1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order . Sydney, Australia: Free Press .
27.
———. 2000. Try again: A reply to Russett, Oneal & Cox. Journal of Peace Research37 (5): 609-10.
28.
Isga.2003. The proposal by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam on behalf of the Tamil people for an agreement to establish an interim self-governing authority for the northeast of the island of Sri Lanka. LTTE Peace Secretariat, November 1. http://www.eelam.com/isga/proposal.pdf.
29.
Juergensmeyer, Mark.1993. The new cold war? Religious nationalism confronts the secular state. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
Kaufmann, Chaim.1996. Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars . International Security20 (4): 136-75.
31.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg .2000. Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44 (2): 347-61.
32.
Leng, Russel J., and Patrick M. Regan .2003. Social and political cultural effects on the outcomes of mediation in militarized interstate dispute. International Studies Quarterly47 (3): 431-52.
33.
Lesh, Ann Mosely.1993. Negotiations in Sudan. In Making war and waging peace: Foreign intervention in Africa, ed. D. R. Smock.Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
34.
Little, David.1994. Sri Lanka: The invention of enmity. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press .
35.
Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers.2002. Polity IV Project, political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800—2002. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/ .
36.
Mason, David T., and Patrick J. Fett .1996. How civil wars end: A rational choice approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution40 (4): 546-68.
37.
Pearce, Susanna.2005. Religious rage: A quantitative analysis of the intensity of armed conflicts. Terrorism and Political Violence17:333-52.
38.
Rashid, Ahmed.2002. Jihad: The rise of militant Islam in Central Asia. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
Regan, Patrick M.2002. Civil wars and foreign powers: Outside intervention in intrastate conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
Regan, Patrick M., and Aysegul Aydin.2006. Diplomacy and other forms of intervention in civil wars . Journal of Conflict Resolution50 (5): 736-56.
41.
Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2002 . Ethnicity, political systems and civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution46 (1): 29-54.
42.
Rubin, Jeffrey Z., Dean G. Pruitt, and Sung Hee Kim.1994. Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement . New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
Russett, Bruce M., John R. Oneal, and Michaelene Cox.2000. Clash of civilisations, or realism and liberalism déjá vu? Some evidence. Journal of Peace Research37 (5): 583-608.
44.
Svensson, Isak.2007. Bargaining, bias and peace brokers: How rebels commit to peace. Journal of Peace Research44 (2): 177-94.
45.
Telhami, Shibley.2005. Beyond resolution? The Palestinian-Israeli conflict. In Grasping the nettle: Analyzing cases of intractable conflict, ed. C. Crocker, F. O. Hampson and P. Aall.Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press .
46.
Toft, Monica Duffy.2004. The geography of ethnic violence: Identity, interests, and the indivisibility of territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
———. 2006a. Issue indivisibility and time horizons as rationalist explanations for war. Security Studies15 (1): 34-69.
48.
———. 2006b. Religion, civil war, and international order. Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
49.
———. 2007. Getting religion?The puzzling case of Islam and civil war. International Security31 (4): 97-131.
50.
Tusicisny, Andrej.2004. Civilisational conflicts: More frequent, longer, and bloodier?Journal of Peace Research41 (4): 485-98.
51.
Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP).2007 . http://www.pcr.uu.se/database/index.php.
52.
Wallensteen, Peter.2002. Understanding conflict resolution: War, peace and the global system. London: Sage.
53.
Walter, Barbara F.1997. The critical barrier to civil war settlement. International Organization51 (3): 335-64.
54.
———. 2002. Committing to peace: The successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
