Most literature on special elections has focused on first-past-the-post contests and on the performance of governments. Turnout, candidates, and how the electoral system impacts the result have received less attention. This contribution fills these voids by exploring special elections in Ireland, elections conducted under the alternative vote system. Taking a multifaceted approach, it investigates the correlates of turnout, the impact of candidates and the decisive effect of lower preferences, while also testing multiple explanations of government performance. I find Irish special elections live up to the by-election truisms of lower turnout and government loss. Government performance is associated with national economic conditions. By-election victory is more likely among candidates with familial lineage and former members of parliament. Where they come into play, one in five candidates owe their victory to lower preferences.
AbramowitzAWebsterSW (2016) The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of US elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies41: 12–22.
2.
AndersonCJWardDS (1996) Barometer elections in comparative perspective. Electoral Studies15(4): 447–460.
3.
BennettS (1996) Winning and Losing: Australian National Elections. Melbourne, AU: Melbourne University Press.
4.
BlaisA (2010) Political participation. In: LeDucLNiemiRGNorrisP (eds) Comparing Democracies 3: Elections and Voting in the 21st Century, 1st edn. London: SAGE Publishing, pp.165–83.
5.
BlaisAGidengilENevitteN, et al. (2004) Where does turnout decline come from?European Journal of Political Research43(2): 221–236.
6.
Blais-LacombeABodetMA (2017) Les Élections Partielles Au Québec: Caractéristiques et Tendances. Politique et Sociétés36(3): 115–139.
7.
BlondelJSinnottRSvenssonP (1998) People and Parliament in the European Union: Democracy, Participation and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BostonJ (1980) By-elections in New Zealand: An overview. Political Science32(2): 103–127.
9.
ButlerD (1949) Trends in British by-elections. Journal of Politics11: 396–407.
10.
CainBEFerejohnJAFiorinaMP (1984) The constituency service basis of the personal vote for US representatives and British members of parliament. American Political Science Review78: 110–125.
11.
CampbellA (1960) Surge and decline: A study of electoral change. The Public Opinion Quarterly24(3): 397–418.
12.
CampbellJE (1985) Explaining presidential losses in midterm congressional elections. Journal of Politics47(4): 1140–1157.
13.
CampbellJE (1986) Presidential coattails and midterm losses in state legislative elections. American Political Science Review80(1): 45–63.
14.
CarseyTMWrightGC (1998) State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science42(3): 994–1002.
15.
ChubbB (1970) The Government and the Politics of Ireland, 1st edn. New York: Routledge.
16.
ChubbJE (1988) Institutions, the economy, and the dynamics of state elections. American Political Science Review82(1): 133–154.
17.
CookCRamsdenJ (eds) (1997) By-elections in British politics. New York: Routledge.
CuzanA (2015) Five laws of politics. Political Science and Politics48: 415–419.
20.
Dal BoEDal BoPSnyderJ (2009) Political dynasties. Review of Economic Studies76: 115–142.
21.
DolanK (2004) Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22.
EriksonRS (1988) The puzzle of midterm loss. Journal of Politics50(4): 1011–1029.
23.
FeigartFBNorrisP (1990) Do by-elections constitute referenda? A four-country comparison. Legislative Studies Quarterly15(2): 183–200.
24.
FeinsteinB (2010) The dynasty advantage: Family ties in congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly35(4): 571–598.
25.
GaddieRKBullockCSIIIBuchananSE (1999) What is so special about special elections?. Legislative Studies Quarterly24(1): 103–112.
26.
GallagherM (1978) Party solidarity, exclusivity and inter-party relationships in Ireland, 1922-1977: The evidence of transfers. Economic and Social Review10(1): 1–22.
27.
GallagherM (1996) By-elections to Dáil Eireann 1923-96: The anomaly that conforms. Irish Political Studies11(1): 33–60.
28.
GibbsHKnottsJRagusaM (2016) The nationalization of special elections for the U.S. House of representatives. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties26(1): 22–39.
29.
GomezBTHansfordTGKrauseGA (2007) The republicans should pray for rain: Weather, turnout, and voting in U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Politics69(3): 649–663.
30.
HarrisonMJMarshM (1998) A re-examination of an Irish popularity function. Public Choice94(3): 367–383.
31.
HerreraRYawnM (1991) The emergence of the personal vote. Journal of Politics61(1): 136–150.
JesseNG (2000) Does the transfer of votes really matter?Representation37(3–4): 187–193.
34.
KarpJVowlesJBanducciS, et al. (2002) Strategic voting, party activity, and candidate effects. Electoral Studies21(1): 1–22.
35.
KingA (1968) Why all governments lose by-elections. New Society1968: 413–415.
36.
LenzGLawsonC (2011) Looking the part: Television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates’ appearance. American Journal of Political Science55(3): 574–589.
37.
Lewis-BeckMS (1988) Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
38.
Lewis-BeckMSQuinlanS (Forthcoming) Brexit and prosperity but defeat: The economic vote conundrum in the 2020 Irish election. Irish Political Studies.
39.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2013) The VP-function revisited: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice157(3–4): 267–285.
40.
LeydenKMLewis-BeckMS (2017) The economy and the vote in Irish national elections. In: MarshMFarrellDMcElroyG (eds) A Conservative Revolution? Electoral Change in Twenty-First Century Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.28–41.
41.
LoewenPBastienF (2010) (In)significant elections? Federal by-elections in Canada 1963–2008. Canadian Journal of Political Science43(1): 87–105.
42.
McAllisterI (2007) The personalization of politics. In: DaltonRJKlingemannHD (eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour: Oxford Handbooks of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.571–588.
43.
MarienSDassonnevilleRHoogheM (2015) How second order are local elections? Voting motives and party preferences in Belgian municipal elections. Local Government Studies41(6): 898–916.
44.
MarshM (1981) Electoral preferences in Irish recruitment: The 1977 election. European Journal of Political Research9: 61–74.
45.
MarshM (1998) Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science28(4): 591–607.
46.
MarshM (2007) Candidates or parties? Objects of electoral choice in Ireland. Party Politics13(4): 500–527.
47.
MarshMSinnottRGarryJ, et al. (2008) The Irish Voter. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
48.
MayerSJ (2017) How negative partisanship affects voting behavior in Europe: Evidence from an analysis of 17 European multi-party systems with proportional voting. Research & Politics4: 686636.
49.
MughanA (1986) A political explanation of government vote losses in midterm by-elections. American Political Science Review80(3): 761–775.
50.
MughanA (1988) On the by-election vote of governments in Britain. Legislative Studies Quarterly13(1): 29–48.
51.
NorrisP (1990) British By-elections: The Volatile Electorate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
52.
NorrisPFeigartFB (1989) Government and third-party performance in mid-term by-elections: The Canadian, British and Australian experience. Electoral Studies8(2): 117–130.
53.
OkolikjMQuinlanS (2016) Context matters: Economic voting in the 2009 and 2014 European parliament elections. Politics and Governance4(1): 145–166.
54.
PaldamM (1991) How robust is the vote function? A study of seventeen nations over four decades. In: NorporthHLewis-BeckMSLafayJD (eds) Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp.9–31.
55.
PerssonMSundellAÖhrvallR (2014) Does election day weather affect voter turnout? Evidence from Swedish elections. Electoral Studies33: 335–342.
56.
QuinlanS (2016) Identity formation and political generations: Age, cohort, and period effects in Irish elections. In: FarrellDElkinkJA (eds) The Act of Voting: Identities, Institutions, and Locale. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.255–275.
57.
QuinlanSSchwarzH (2020) The transfers game: A comparative analysis of the mechanical effect of lower preference votes in STV systems. International Political Science Review. Epub ahead of print 22 April. DOI: 10.1177/0192512120907925.
58.
RallingsCThrasherMBorisyukG (2003) Seasonal factors, voter fatigue and the costs of voting. Electoral Studies22(1): 65–79.
59.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
60.
SchmittH (2005) The European Parliament elections of June 2004: Still second-order?West European Politics28(3): 650–679.
61.
SigelmanL (1981) Special elections to the U.S. house: Some descriptive generalization. Legislative Studies Quarterly6(4): 577–588.
SmithDRBrunellTL (2010) Special elections to the U.S. house of representatives: A general election barometer?Legislative Studies Quarterly35(2): 283–297.
64.
StudlarDTSigelmanL (1987) Special elections: A comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science17(2): 247–256.
TufteE (1975) Determinants of the outcomes of midterm congressional elections. American Political Science Review69: 812–826.
67.
WlezienC (2016) Policy (mis)representation and the cost of ruling: U.S. presidential elections in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies50: 711–738.
68.
WolfingerRERosenstoneSJ (1980) Who Votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
69.
World Bank (2017) Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2017 (accessed 22 March 2021).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
