Why does the frequency of military interstate disputes decrease as elections approach? I study this ‘pre-election peace’ and show that the prevailing explanation, which holds that foreign countries believe leaders who face elections are eager to wage war and therefore behave cautiously towards them, does not hold empirically. Instead, I develop an alternative theory that centres on the electoral incentives of the leader facing election. Whereas popular incumbents approaching elections seek to avoid conflict as their electoral prospects are already promising, unpopular leaders are more prone to wage war with the hope it would improve their public standing. Using a novel dataset that ties public opinion data to military interstate disputes, I find support for the theory’s key predictions. The findings highlight the important role of domestic electoral considerations in shaping foreign policy decisions.
AlesinaANourielRGeraldDC (1997) Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BlechmanBKaplanSS (1978) Force without War: US Armed Forces as a Political Instrument. Washington, DC: The Brooking Institution.
3.
BormannNCGolderM (2013) Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946-2011. Electoral Studies32: 360–369.
4.
BothwellRDrummondIDrummondIM, et al. (1990) Canada 1900-1945. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
5.
BoyerJP (1996) Direct Democracy in Canada: The History and Future of Referendums. Toronto, ON, Cananda: Dundurn Press.
6.
Bueno de MesquitaBSmithASiversonRM, et al. (2005) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
ButlerDButlerG (1994) British Political Facts, 1900-1994, 7th edn.New York: St. Martin’s Press.
8.
CarlinREGregoryJLTimothyH, et al. (2016) Executive approval database 1.0. Available at: www.executiveapproval.org (accessed 09 October 2020).
9.
DeRouenKR (1995) The indirect link: Politics, the economy and the use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution39: 671–695.
10.
DeRouenKR (2000) Presidents and the diversionary use of force: A research note. International Studies Quarterly44(2): 317–328.
11.
DownsGWRockeDM (1994) Conflict, agency, and gambling for resurrection: The principal-agent problem goes to war. American Journal of Political Science38: 362–380.
12.
DrazenA (2000) The political business cycle after 25 years. NBER Macroeconomics Annual15: 75–117.
13.
DunbabinJPD (1966) Parliamentary elections in Great Britain, 1868-1900: A psephological note. The English Historical Review81(318): 82–99. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/559902 (accessed 09 October 2020).
GaubatzKT (1991) Election cycles and war. Journal of Conflict Resolution35(2): 212–244.
16.
GaubatzKT (1999) Elections and War: The Electoral Incentive in the Democratic Politics of War and Peace. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
GowaJ (2011) Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
HeniszWJ (2000) The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics12(1): 1–31.
19.
HintonG (2015) Newcastle and the Boer War: Regional reactions to an imperial war. Northern History52(2): 272–294.
20.
HowellWGPevehouseJC (2005) Presidents, congress, and the use of force. International Organization59(1): 209–232.
21.
JamesPOnealJR (1991) Influences on the President’s use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution35: 307–332.
22.
JenningsWWlezienC (2016) The timeline of elections: A comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science60(1): 219–233.
23.
JosephP (2016) The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.
24.
MaozZ (2005) Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes Dataset Version 2.0 (DYDMID2.0). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EN67CI (accessed 09 October 2020).
25.
Market and Opinion Research International Ltd (2018) Dataset. Available at: http://www.mori.com/ (accessed 09 October 2020).
26.
MarshallMGJaggersKGurrTR (2002) Polity IV dataset: Dataset users manual. College Park: University of Maryland.
27.
MartinezL (2009) A theory of political cycles. Journal of Economic Theory144: 1166–1186.
28.
MedziniM (2017) Golda Meir: A Political Biography. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
29.
MeernikJWatermanP (1996) The myth of the diversionary use of force by American Presidents. Political Research Quarterly36: 176–187.
30.
MorganCAndersonC (1999) Domestic support and diversionary external conflict in Great Britain, 1950-1992. The Journal of Politics61(3): 799–814.
31.
MuellerJE (1970) Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review64: 18–34.
32.
MuellerJE (1973) War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
33.
MünsterJStallK (2005) War with outsiders makes peace inside. Discussion paper series of SFB/TR 15 governance and the efficiency of economic systems 75. Berlin: Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
34.
MurrayS (2017) The ‘rally-’round-the-flag’ phenomenon and the diversionary use of force. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Epub ahead of print June. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.518.
35.
OstromCWJrJobBL (1986) The President and the political use of force. American Political Science Review80: 541–566.
36.
PalmerGd’Orazio V, Kenwick M and Lane M (2015) The MID4 data set, 2002–2010: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science 32(2): 222–242.
37.
RabinovichA (2004) The Yom Kippur War. New York: Schocken Books.
38.
ReadmanP (2001) The Conservative party, patriotism, and British politics: The case of the general election of 1900. Journal of British Studies40(1): 107–145.
39.
RussettBM (1990) Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
ShiMSvenssonJ (2003) Political budget cycles: A review of recent developments. Nordic J. Political Economy29: 67–76.
41.
SingerJDSmallM (1984) Wages of War, 1816-1980. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-City University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
42.
SingerJDStuartBJohnS (1972) Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In: RussettB (ed.) Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publishing, pp.19–48.
43.
SmithA (1996) Diversionary foreign policy in democratic systems. International Studies Quarterly40(1): 133–153.
44.
SmithA (1998) International crises and domestic politics. American Political Science Review92(3): 623–638.
45.
SmithA (2004) Election Timing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
StaceyCP (1970) Arms, Men and Government: The War Policies of Canada, 1939–1945. Ottawa, ON, Canada: The Queen’s Printer by authority of the Minister of National Defence.
47.
StollR (1984) The guns of November. Journal of Conflict Resolution28(2): 231–246.
