Climate policy across the developed world remains inadequate, despite high levels of concern about climate change among the public. Yet public opinion on climate change is complex, with individuals differing on three key opinion dimensions: belief and concern, issue salience, and support for government action. In this study, we investigate how these dimensions intersect at the individual level. Based on data from an online survey conducted in 2018 in the United Kingdom (N = 787), a latent class analysis reveals that there are five climate change opinion publics. The two largest publics have strong beliefs that climate change is occurring, but view it as a low salience issue, or are wary of government action to address it. We also investigate sociopolitical covariates of each public. By providing a detailed picture of climate change views, these findings can help us to better understand the relationship between public opinion and climate policy.
AsparouhovTMuthénB (2014) Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling21(3): 329–341.
2.
AsparouhovTMuthénB (2015) Residual associations in latent class and latent transition analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal22(2): 169–177.
BolsenTDruckmanJN (2018) Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations21(3): 389–402.
5.
Bromley-TrujilloRPoeJ (2018) The importance of salience: Public opinion and state policy action on climate change. Journal of Public Policy, October30, 2018, 1–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X18000375.
6.
BuhrmesterMKwangTGoslingSD (2011) Amazon’s mechanical Turk. Perspectives on Psychological Science6(1): 3–5.
7.
BursteinP (2003) The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly56(1): 29–40.
8.
CapstickSPidgeonN (2014) What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change24: 389–401.
9.
CarterNChildsM (2018) Friends of the earth as a policy entrepreneur: ‘The Big Ask’ campaign for a UK Climate Change Act. Environmental Politics27(6): 994–1013.
10.
ClementsB (2012) Exploring public opinion on the issue of climate change in Britain. British Politics7(2): 183–202.
11.
CorryOJørgensenD (2015) Beyond ‘deniers’ and ‘believers’: Towards a map of the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Change32: 165–174.
12.
DietzTFitzgeraldAShwomR (2005) Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources30(1): 335–372.
13.
DrewsSvan den BerghJCJM (2016) What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy16(7): 855–876.
14.
DruckmanJNMcGrathMC (2019) The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change9(2): 111.
15.
EganPJMullinM (2017) Climate change: U.S. public opinion. Annual Review of Political Science20(1): 209–227.
HagenBMiddelAPijawkaD (2016) European climate change perceptions: Public support for mitigation and adaptation policies. Environmental Policy and Governance26(3): 170–183.
18.
HamiltonLC (2011) Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change104(2): 231–242.
19.
HamiltonLCHartterJLemcke-StamponeM, et al. (2015) Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLoS ONE10: e0138208.
20.
HerrnstadtEMuehleggerE (2014) Weather, salience of climate change and congressional voting. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management68(3): 435–448.
21.
HornseyMJHarrisEABainPG, et al. (2016) Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change6(6): 622–626.
22.
JylhäKMAkramiN (2015) Social dominance orientation and climate change denial: The role of dominance and system justification. Personality and Individual Differences86: 108–111.
23.
KahanDM (2015) Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology36(Suppl. 1): 1–43.
24.
KahanDM (2016) The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, part 1: What politically motivated reasoning is and how to measure it. In: ScottRAKosslynSM (eds) Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp.1–16.
25.
KahanDMPetersEWittlinM, et al. (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change2(10): 732–735.
26.
KantenbacherJHannaPCohenS, et al. (2018) Public attitudes about climate policy options for aviation. Environmental Science & Policy81: 46–53.
27.
KnightKW (2016) Public awareness and perception of climate change: A quantitative cross-national study. Environmental Sociology2(1): 101–113.
28.
KotchenMJTurkZMLeiserowitzA (2017) Public willingness to pay for a U.S. carbon tax and preferences for spending the revenue. Environmental Research Letters12(9): 094012.
29.
KvaloyBFinseraasHListhaugO (2012) The publics’ concern for global warming: A cross-national study of 47 countries. Journal of Peace Research49(1): 11–22.
30.
LaursenBHoffE (2006) Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly52(3): 377–389.
LewisGBPalmRFengB (2018) Cross-national variation in determinants of climate change concern. Environmental Politics28: 793–821.
33.
LorenzoniIPidgeonNF (2006) Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change77(1): 73–95.
34.
McCrightAMDunlapRE (2011) Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change21(4): 1163–1172.
35.
McCrightAMDunlapREXiaoC (2013) Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change119(2): 511–518.
36.
MagnussonD (2003) The person approach: Concepts, measurement models, and research strategy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development101: 3–23.
37.
MaibachELeiserowitzARoser-RenoufC, et al. (2011) Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS ONE6(3): e0017571.
38.
MetagJFüchslinTSchäferMS (2017) Global warming’s five Germanys: A typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information. Public Understanding of Science26(4): 434–451.
39.
MilfontTLSibleyCG (2016) Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism: A one-year Bayesian mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences90: 85–88.
40.
MoorsG (2003) The two faces of (post)materialism: A decomposition approach. International Journal of Public Opinion Research15(4): 396–412.
41.
MorrisonMDuncanRSherleyC, et al. (2013) A comparison between attitudes to climate change in Australia and the United States. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management20(2): 87–100.
42.
MostafaMM (2016) Post-materialism, religiosity, political orientation, locus of control and concern for global warming: A multilevel analysis across 40 nations. Social Indicators Research128(3): 1273–1298.
43.
MullerCJMacLehoseRF (2014) Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: Different methods correspond to different target populations. International Journal of Epidemiology43(3): 962–970.
44.
NisbetMCMyersT (2007) The polls-trends twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly71(3): 444–470.
45.
PalanSSchitterC (2017) Prolific.ac – A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance17: 22–27.
46.
PeerEBrandimarteLSamatS, et al. (2017) Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology70: 153–163.
PidgeonN (2012) Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Climate Policy12(Suppl. 01): S85–S106.
49.
PoortingaWSpenceAWhitmarshL, et al. (2011) Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change21(3): 1015–1024.
50.
PoortingaWWhitmarshLStegL, et al. (2019) Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: A cross-European analysis. Global Environmental Change55: 25–35.
51.
RaileEDRaileANWSalmonCT, et al. (2014) Defining public will. Politics and Policy42(1): 103–130.
52.
RietigKLaingT (2017) Policy stability in climate governance: The case of the United Kingdom. Environmental Policy and Governance27: 575–587.
53.
ScruggsLBenegalS (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession?Global Environmental Change22(2): 505–515.
54.
ShapiroRY (2011) Public opinion and American democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly75(5): 982–1017.
55.
SorokaSNWlezienC (2004) Degrees of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
SpenceAVenablesDPidgeonN, et al. (2010) Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted in January-March 2010. School of Psychology, Cardiff University. Available at: http://psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/final_report.pdf (accessed 5 November 2019).
57.
SteentjesKPidgeonNPoortingaW, et al. (2017) European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): Topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Cardiff University. Available at: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/98660/7/EPCC.pdf (accessed 5 November 2019).
58.
TaylorALBruinedeBruinWDessaiS (2014a) Climate change beliefs and perceptions of weather-related changes in the United Kingdom. Risk Analysis34(11): 1995–2004.
59.
TaylorALDessaiSBruine de BruinW (2014b) Public perception of climate risk and adaptation in the UK: A review of the literature. Climate Risk Management4–5: 1–16.
60.
TjernströmETietenbergT (2008) Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies?Ecological Economics65(2): 315–324.
61.
TranterBBoothK (2015) Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study. Global Environmental Change33: 154–164.
62.
Van der LindenS (2017) Determinants and measurement of climate change risk perception, worry, and concern. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2953631, 16April. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2953631 (accessed 5 November 2019).
63.
VandeweerdtCKerremansBCohnA (2016) Climate voting in the US Congress: The power of public concern. Environmental Politics25(2): 268–288.
64.
WhitmarshL (2011) Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change21(2): 690–700.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
