Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In 2010, the incoming Coalition government announced that it would publish details of meetings between ministers and outside interests. We have collated and coded these data and, in this article, describe patterns of access between 2010 and 2015. In some respects, access is notably fragmented. No single organisation attends more than 2.5% of the 6292 meetings held by ministers. On the contrary, business, collectively, attends fully 45% of all meetings: more than twice the share of any other category of organisation. We also find evidence of distinctive policy communities characterised by high levels of access between particular interests and ministers within specific departments.

Keywords

access business coalition government lobbying

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailer

(2010) What factors determine bargaining power and success in EU negotiations? Journal of European Public Policy 17(5): 743–757.

Ball

Rajeev

Watt

(2011) Lobbying links put pressure on coalition. The Guardian, 16 October. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/oct/16/lobbying-links-coalition (accessed 20 March 2017).

Baumgartner

Berry

Hojnacki

. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. London: University of Chicago Press.

Baumgartner

Leech

(2001) Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics 63(4): 1191–1213.

Beer

(1969) Modern British Politics: A Study of Parties and Pressure Groups. London: Faber & Faber.

Bell

Hindmoor

(2015) Taming the city? Ideas, structural power and the evolution of British banking policy amidst the great financial meltdown. New Political Economy 20(3): 454–474.

Binderkrantz

(2008) Different groups, different strategies: How interest groups pursue their political ambitions. Scandinavian Political Studies 31(2): 173–200.

Bouwen

(2004) Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research 43(3): 337–369.

Budge

McKay

Newton

. (2007) The New British Politics. London: Routledge.

10.

Cabinet Office (2014) Transparency. Available at: https://insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2014/09/transparency-18-May-2014.pdf (accessed 20 March 2017).

11.

Christiansen

Dowding

(1994) Pluralism or state autonomy? The case of the amnesty international (British section): The insider/outsider group. Political Studies 42(1): 15–24.

12.

Chubb

(1983) Interest Groups and the Bureaucracy: The Politics of Energy. Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.

13.

Culpepper

(2011) Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Culpepper

(2016) Capitalism, institutions, and power in the study of business. In: Fioretos

Falleti

Sheingate

(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.453–466.

15.

Dahl

(1958) A critique of the ruling elite model. American Political Science Review 52(2): 463–469.

16.

Denham

Garnett

(1996) The nature and impact of think tanks in contemporary Britain. Contemporary British History 10(1): 43–61.

17.

Dowding

Hindmoor

Martin

(2016) The comparative policy agendas project: Theory, measurement and findings. Journal of Public Policy 36(1): 3–25.

18.

Drope

Hansen

(2006) Does firm size matter? Analyzing business lobbying in the United States. Business and Politics 8(2): 1–17.

19.

Dür

De Bièvre

(2007) Inclusion without influence? NGOs in European trade policy. Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 79–101.

20.

Eising

(2007) The access of business interests to EU institutions: Towards elite pluralism? Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 384–403.

21.

Flinders

Dommett

Tonkiss

(2014) Bonfires and barbecues: Coalition governance and the politics of Quango reform. Contemporary British History 28(1): 56–80.

22.

Gais

Peterson

Walker

(2009) Interest groups, iron triangles and representative institutions in American National Government. British Journal of Political Science 14(2): 161–185.

23.

Hacker

Pierson

(2002) Business power and social policy: Employers and the formation of the American welfare state. Politics & Society 30(2): 277–325.

24.

Hawkins

Holden

McCambridge

(2012) Alcohol industry influence on UK alcohol policy: A new research agenda for public health. Critical Public Health 22(3): 297–305.

25.

Hindmoor

(2009) Explaining networks through mechanisms: Vaccination, priming and the 2001 foot and mouth disease crisis. Political Studies 57(1): 75–94.

26.

Hodge

(2012) Committee publishes report on implementing the transparency agenda. Available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/public-accounts-committee/news/transparency-report/ (accessed 13 December 2016).

27.

Institute for Government (2015) Whitehall monitor. Available at: http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/transparency (accessed 8 September 2016).

28.

Klüver

(2012) Biasing politics? Interest group participation in EU policy-making. West European Politics 35(5): 1114–1133.

29.

Kollman

(1998) Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

30.

Langbein

(1986) Money and access: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Politics 48(4): 1052–1062.

31.

Lefort

(2010) Four labour MPs implicated in ‘cash for influence’ scandal. The Telegraph, 21 March. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/7490787/Four-Labour-MPs-implicated-in-cash-for-influence-scandal.html (accessed 13 December 2016).

32.

Lindblom

(1977) Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.

33.

McFarland

(1987) Interest groups and theories of power in America. British Journal of Political Science 17(2): 129–147.

34.

Marin

Mayntz

(eds) (1991) Policy Network: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

35.

Martinson

Rawlinson

(2015) Rupert Murdoch and top news corp executives met ministers 10 times in a year. The Guardian, 15 December. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/dec/15/rupert-murdoch-news-corp-ministers-meetings-media-reform-coalition (accessed 13 December 2016).

36.

Moran

(2015) Politics and Governance in the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

37.

O’Carroll

Halliday

(2012) Rupert Murdoch admits NoW phone-hacking culture of cover-up. The Guardian, 26 April. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/apr/26/murdoch-admits-phone-hacking-coverup (accessed 13 December 2016).

38.

Open Data Barometer (2016) Rankings. Available at: http://opendatabarometer.org/2ndEdition/analysis/rankings.html (accessed 6 December 2016).

39.

Porter

(2010) David Cameron warns lobbying is next political scandal. The Telegraph, 8 February. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7189466/David-Cameron-warns-lobbying-is-next-political-scandal.html (accessed 13 December 2016).

40.

Rhodes

RAW

Marsh

(1992) New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research 21: 181–205.

41.

Richards

Smith

(2002) Governance and Public Policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

42.

Richardson

Jordan

Kimber

(1978) Lobbying, administrative reform and policy styles: The case of land drainage. Political Studies 26(1): 47–64.

43.

Smith

(2009) Power and the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

44.

Smith

Marsh

Richards

(1993) Central government departments and the policy process. Public Administration 71(4): 567–594.

45.

Somerville

Goodman

(2010) The role of networks in the development of UK migration policy. Political Studies 58(5): 951–970.

46.

Weiler

Brändli

(2015) Insider versus outsider lobbying: How the institutional framework shapes the lobbying behaviour of interest groups. European Journal of Political Research 54(4): 745–766.

47.

Yackee

(2006) A bias towards business? Assessing interest group influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy. Journal of Politics 68(1): 128–139.

48.

Zuiderwijk

Janssen

(2014) Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly 31(1): 17–29.

Who meets whom: Access and lobbying during the coalition years

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References