Ideas may impact economic policy change, but their specific effects are difficult to untangle. Material factors may influence both ideational change and policy change. In order to study these complex interrelationships, this article looks at the impact of both ideational change (the rise and fall and rise of free-market economics) and material factors (competitive pressure, crises, and domestic politics) on financial regulatory change and on one another in the United Kingdom and United States since 1846. Using a vector error correction model, I find that elite ideas influenced regulation in Britain, but not the United States. Material factors exhibited more explanatory power in both cases, although institutional differences between Britain and the United States made some shocks more or less important in either country. Material factors also influenced ideational change in both cases.
AdlerEHaasP (1992) Conclusion: Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization46(1): 367–390.
2.
AmableB (2003) The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BakerAUnderhillG (2015) Economic ideas and the political construction of the financial crash of 2008. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations17(3): 381–390.
4.
BlaugM (1985a) Great Economists before Keynes. New York: Wheatsheaf Books.
5.
BlaugM (1985b) Great Economists since Keynes. New York: Wheatsheaf Books.
6.
BlythM (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2016) Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000 (accessed 10 January 2016).
CernyP (1995) Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization49(4): 595–625.
11.
ChwierothJ (2007) Neoliberal economists and capital account liberalization in emerging markets. International Organization61(2): 443–463.
12.
ChwierothJ (2010) Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
CopelovitchM (2010) The International Monetary Fund in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CostigliolaF (1977) Anglo-American Financial Rivalry in the 1920s. The Journal of Economic History37(4): 911–934.
15.
CrouchC (2011) The Strange Non-death of Neo-liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
De BoefSKeeleL (2008) Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science52(1): 184–200.
17.
Dellepiane-AvellanedaS (2015) The political power of economic ideas: The case of ‘expansionary fiscal contractions’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations17(3): 391–418.
18.
EndersW (2001) Applied Econometric Time Series, 2nd edn.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
EngleRGrangerC (1987) Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica55(2): 251–276.
20.
FergusonT (1995) The Golden Rule. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
21.
GerschenkronA (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
GouldE (2006) Money Talks: The International Monetary Fund, Conditionality and Supplementary Financiers. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
GreeneW (2008) Econometric Analysis, 6th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25.
GrossmanGHelpmannE (2001) Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
GrossmanR (2010) Unsettled Account: The Evolution of Banking in the Industrialized World Since 1800. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
HallP (1989) The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
HelleinerE (1996) States and the Reemergence of Global Finance: From Bretton-Woods to the 1990s. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
HelleinerEPagliariS (2010) Crisis and the reform of international financial regulation. In: HelleinerEPagliariSZimmermanH (eds) Global Finance in Crisis: The Politics of International Regulatory Change. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–18.
30.
HendricksonJ (2001) The long and bumpy road to Glass-Steagall reform: A historical and evolutionary analysis of banking legislation. American Journal of Economics and Sociology60(4): 849–879.
31.
HibbsD (1977) Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review71(4): 1467–1487.
32.
HiggsR (1987) Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
JensenN (2008) Nation-States and the Multinational Corporation: A Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
JohansenS (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of co-integration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica59(6): 1551–1580.
35.
JohnsonSKwakJ (2011) 13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown. New York: Pantheon Books.
36.
KennedyW (1987) Industrial Structure, Capital Markets, and the Origins of British Economic Decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
KrosznerRStrahanP (1999) What drives deregulation? Economics and politics of the relaxation of bank branching restrictions. Quarterly Journal of Economics114(4): 1437–1467.
38.
LoayzaNRanciereR (2006) Financial development, financial fragility and growth. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking38(4): 1051–1076.
39.
LomazoffE (2009) Congressional leaders 1789–2000. Voteview. Available at: http://voteview.com/leaders.htm (accessed 23 April 2015).
40.
LutkepohlHKraizigM (2004) Applied Time Series Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
McClearyRHayR (1980) Applied Time Series Analysis for Social Science. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Puplishing.
42.
McGillivrayF (2004) Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
MizruchiM (2013) The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
ModelskiGThompsonW (1996) Leading Sectors and World Powers: The Co-evolution of Global Economics and Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
46.
MoschellaM (2015) The institutional roots of incremental ideational change: The IMF and capital controls after the global financial crisis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations17(3): 442–460.
47.
MosleyL (2000) Room to move: International financial markets and national welfare states. International Organization54(4): 737–773.
48.
MurrayM (1994) A drunk and her dog: An illustration of co-integration and error correction. The American Statistician48(1): 37–39.
OrganskiAFKKuglerJ (1980) The War Ledger. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
OstromCSmithR (1992) Error correction, attitude persistence and executive rewards and punishments: A behavioral theory of presidential approval. Political Analysis4: 127–184.
52.
RameyGRameyV (1995) Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth. American Economic Review85(5): 1138–1151.
53.
ReichR (1997) Locked in the Cabinet. New York: Knopf.
54.
ReinhartCRogoffK (2009) This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
ReinhartCRogoffK (2011) From financial crash to debt crisis. NBER, paper 15795. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15795.pdf (accessed 27 March 2016).
56.
RosenbluthFSchaapR (2003) The domestic politics of banking regulation. International Organization57(2): 307–336.
57.
SchwartzH (2009) Subprime Nation: American Power, Global Capital and the Housing Bubble. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
58.
SeabrookeL (2006) The Social Sources of Financial Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
59.
SimmonsB (1994) Who Adjusts: Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy during the Interwar Years. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
SimmonsBElkinsZ (2004) The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review98(1): 171–189.
61.
SkidelskyR (2010) Keynes: The Return of the Master. New York: Public Affairs.
62.
StoneD (1996) Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
63.
StrangeS (1998) Mad Money: When Markets Outgrow States. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
64.
StratmannT (2002) Can special interests buy congressional votes? Evidence from financial services legislation. The Journal of Law and Economics45(2): 345–373.
65.
SuarezSKolodnyR (2011) Paving the road to ‘Too big to fail’: Business interests and the politics of financial deregulation in the United States. Politics & Society39(1): 74–102.
66.
TaylorJ (2006) Creating Capitalism: Joint-stock Enterprise in British Politics and Culture. London: Royal Historical Society.
67.
TwomeyM (2000) A Century of Foreign Investment in the Twentieth Century. New York: Routledge.
UnderhillG (2015) The emerging post-crisis financial architecture: The path dependency of ideational adverse selection. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations17(3): 461–493.
WebberM (2000) New Deal Fat Cats: Business, Labor and Campaign Finance in the 1936 Election. New York: Fordham University Press.
72.
WidmaierWBlythMSeabrookeL (2007) Endogenous shocks or exogenous constructions? The meanings of wars and crises. International Studies Quarterly51(4): 747–759.
73.
ZingalesL (2013) Preventing economists’ capture. In: CarpenterDMossD (eds) Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
