This article argues that parliamentary institutions have increasing difficulty in addressing and dealing with the growing complexity, highly technical character and rapidity of many developments in modern societies. Deficits in representation, in knowledge and competence, and in engagement or commitment effectively erode the authority and status of parliamentary government. Major rule- and policy-making activities are being substantially displaced from parliamentary bodies and central governments to global, regional and local agents as well as agents operating in the many sectors of a highly differentiated, modern society. Governance - and sovereignty - are increasingly diffused upward, downward and outward beyond parliament and its government. The author identifies problems, practical as well as normative, with this general development and discusses the possibilities and limitations of reform.
Alexander, J.
(1995) `Collective Action and Democratic Discourse: Social Movements as “Translations” of Civil Society', paper presented at the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences.Uppsala, Sweden.
2.
Alter, C.
and Hage, J. (1993) Organizations Working Together.Newbury Park: Sage.
3.
Andersen, S.S.
and Burns, T.R. (1992) Societal Decision-making: Democratic Challenges to State Technocracy.Hampshire, England: Dartmouth.
4.
Andersen, S.S.
and Burns, T.R. (1996) `The European Community and the Erosion of Parliamentary Democracy: A Study of Post-parliamentary Governance', in S.S. Andersen and K.A. Eliassen (eds) The European Union: How Democratic Is It?London: Sage Publications.
5.
Anderson, C.W.
(1976) `Public Policy and Complex Organization: The Problem of Governance and the Further Evolution of Advanced Industrial Society', in L.N. Lindberg (ed.) Politics and the Future of Industrial Society, New York: McKay.
6.
Bobbio, N.
(1987) The Future of Democracy.Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
Bogason, P. and Toonen, T.A.J. (eds) (1998) `Comparing Networks. Public Administration', International Quarterly76(2): 205-407.
8.
Burns, T.R.
(1994) `Post-parliamentary Democracy: Sacralities, Contradictions, and Transitions of Modernity', in Carlo Mongardini (ed.) Religio: Ruolo del sacro, coesione sociale e nuove forme di solidarietà nella società contemporanea.Rome: Bulzone Editore.
9.
Burns, T. R.
and Andersen, S. (1998) `L'Unione europea e l'erosione della democrazia parlamentare: riflessioni sulla politica postparlamentare', Il Mulino, Rivista Bimestrale di cultura e di politica, 3/98, anno xivii, numero 377.
10.
Burns, T.R.
and Dietz, T. (1992) `Cultural Evolution: Social Rule Systems, Selection, and Human Agency', International Sociology7(3): 259-283.
11.
Burns, T.R.
and Engdahl, E. (1998) `The Social Construction of Consciousness: Collective Consciousness and its Socio-cultural Foundations', Journal of Consciousness Studies5(1): 67-85 and (2): 164-184.
12.
Burns, T.R.
and Ueberhorst, R. (1988) Creative Democracy.New York: Praeger.
13.
Calhoun, C.
(1993) `Nationalism and Civil Society: Democracy, Diversity, and Self-Determination', International Sociology8(4): 389.
14.
Dahl, R.
(1993) `Americans Struggle to Cope with a New Political Order that Works in Opaque and Mysterious Ways', Public Affairs Report34: 1-6.
15.
Eisenstadt, S.N.
(1993) `Civil Society and Democracy in Latin America: Some Comparative Observations', Estudios Interdisciplinarios de America Latina y El Caribe4: 27-37.
16.
Fine, R.
and Rai, S. (eds) (1997) Civil Society - Democratic Perspectives. Democratization, Vol. 4.
Heclo, H.
(1978) `Issue Networks and Executive Establishment', in A. King (ed.) The New American Political System, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
19.
Held, D.
(1989) Political Theory and Modern State: Essays on State, Power, and Democracy.Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
Held, D.
(ed.) (1993) Prospects for Democracy.Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.
Held, D.
(1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Global Governance.Cambridge: Policy Press.
22.
Hirst, P.
(1995) `The Limits of Representative Democracy', presentation at the Uppsala Theory Circle Seminar.Uppsala: University of Uppsala, Sweden.
23.
Hirst, P.
and Thompson, G. (1995) `Globalization and the Future of the Nation State', Economy and Society24(3): 408-442.
24.
Hood, C.
and Schrippert, G.F. (eds) (1988) Delivering Public Services in Western Europe.London: Sage Publications.
25.
Jordan, G.
and Maloney, W.A. (1997) `Accounting for Subgovernments: Explaining the Persistence of Policy Communities', Administration and Society29: 557-583.
26.
Kamali, M.
(1998) Revolutionary Iran: Civil Society and State in the Modernization Process.Aldershot: Ashgate.
27.
Kenis, P.
and Schneider, V. (1991) `Policy Networks and Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox', in Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, eds. B. Marin and R. Mayntz.Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
28.
Kohler-Koch, B.
(1995) `The Strength of Weakness: The Transformation of Governance in the European Union', paper presented at the Symposium on the Future of the Nation-State.Uppsala: University of Uppsala, Sweden.
29.
Kooiman, J.
(ed.) (1993) Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions.London: Sage.
30.
McCarthy, P.
(1995) The Crisis of the Italian State.New York: St Martin's Press.
31.
Offe, C.
and Schmitter, P.C. (1995) `The Future of Democracy', in S.M. Lipset (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Democracy.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
32.
Rhodes, R.A.W.
(1991) `Policy Networks and Sub-central Government', in G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic and J. Mitchell (eds) Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life.London: Sage.
33.
Schmitter, P.C.
and Lehmbruch, G. (eds) (1979) Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation.Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.
34.
Seligman, A.B.
(1992) The Idea of Civil Society.New York: The Free Press.
35.
Wright, M.
(1988) `Policy Community, Policy Network, and Comparative Industrial Policies', Political Studies36: 593-612.
