More than 50 years have passed since the eco-emancipatory project (EEP) was launched in the wake of the silent revolution triggered by new social movements. A response to the side-effects of first (industrial) modernity, the EEP helped to shape a second (reflexive) modernity that was supposed to democratise society and liberate nature. But the EEP seems to have failed on that account – hence the post-apocalyptic turn within environmentalism. However, the fate of the EEP is more nuanced than it seems. In this paper, I argue that the latter has been by and large successfully assimilated by liberal societies. The ecomodernist response to the Anthropocene, which pursues human and nonhuman emancipation by means others than those of the EEP, attests to that. It also signals a way out of late modernity, heralding a third modernity characterised by the post-utopian management of socionatural relations in increasingly liberal albeit not fully democratic societies.
AfaryJ.AndersonK. (2005). Foucault and the Iranian revolution: Gender and the seductions of Islamism. The University of Chicago Press.
2.
AndreP.BonevaT.ChopraF., & Falk, A. (2024). Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action. Nature Climate Change, 14, 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01925-3
3.
Arias-MaldonadoM. (2019). Towards a good anthropocene? In Arias-MaldonadoM.TrachtenbertZ. (Eds.), Rethinking the environment for the anthropocene: Political theory and socionatural relations in the new geological age (pp. 137–150). Routledge.
Asafu-AdjayeJ.BlomqvistL.BrandS.BrookB.DeFriesR.EllisE.ForemanC.KeuthD.LewisM.LynasM.NordhaudT.PielkeR.PritkzkerR.RoyJ.SagoffM.ShellenbergerM.StoneR.TeagueP. (2015) An ecomodernist manifesto. http://www.ecomodernism.org/
6.
BeckU. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp.
7.
BeckU. (1994). The reinvention of politics. In BeckU.GiddensA.LashS. (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 1–73). Polity Press.
8.
BeckU. (1995). Ecological politics in an age of risk. Polity.
9.
BeckU. (2009). World at risk. Polity Press.
10.
BlühdornI. (2004). Post-ecologist politics: Social theory and the abdication of the ecologist paradigm. Routledge.
11.
BlühdornI. (2007). Sustaining the unsustainable: Symbolic politics and the politics of simulation. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701211759
12.
BlühdornI. (2022). Post-Democracy and post-sustainability. In BornemannB.KnappeH.NanzP. (Eds.), The routledge handbook of democracy and sustainability (pp. 476–494). Routledge.
13.
BlühdornI. (2023). Recreational experientialism at ‘the abyss’: Rethinking the sustainability crisis and experimental politics. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 19(1), Article 2155439. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2155439
14.
BlühdornI. (2024). Unhaltbarkeit: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp.
15.
BolatnskiL.ChiapelloE. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism. Verso.
16.
BrandK. W. (2021). Das schwarze Loch der ‘Nicht-Nachhaltigkeit’. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Ingolfur Blühdorns Forschungsansatz. Berlin Journal für Soziologie, 31, 279–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-021-00438-6
17.
BrandU.WissenM. (2018). The limits to capitalist nature: Theorizing and overcoming the imperial mode of living. Rowan & Littlefield.
18.
Brooke-SmithJ. (2022). Accelerate! A history of the 90s. The History Press.
19.
BuellF. (2003). From apocalypse to way of life: environmental crisis in the American century. Routledge.
20.
CannavòP. (2016). Environmental political theory and republicanism. In GabrielsonT., Hall, C., Meyer, J. M., Schlosberg, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (pp. 72–88). Oxford University Press.
21.
CassegardC.ThornH. (2018). Toward a postapocalyptic environmentalism?Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/251484861879
22.
CrownshawT.MorganC.AdamsA.SersM.Britto dos SantosN.DamianoA.GilbertL.Yahya HaageG.Horen GreenfordD. (2019). Over the horizon: Exploring the conditions of a post-growth world. The Anthropocene Review, 6(1–2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/251484861879
23.
De GeusM. (1999). Ecological utopias. Envisioning the sustainable society. International Books.
24.
DeLongJ. B. (2022). Slouching towards utopia: An economic history of the twentieth century. Basic Books.
25.
DemariaF.SchneiderF.SekulovaF.Martínez-AlierJ. (2013). What is degrowth? From an activist slogan to a social movement. Environmental Values, 22(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725194
26.
DobsonA. (2013). Political theory in a closed world: Reflections on William Ophuls, liberalism and abundance. Environmental Values, 22(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X1358156172
27.
DryzekJ. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
28.
EhrlichP. (1969). The population bomb. Sierra Club.
FosterJ. B. (2020). Why ecological revolution? In KingL.AuriffeilleD. M. (Eds.), Environmental sociology: From analysis to action (pp. 35–48). Rowman & Littlefield.
32.
FremauxA.BarryJ. (2019). The ‘good anthropocene’ and green political theory: Rethinking environmentalism, resisting eco-modernism. In BiermannF.LövbrandE. (Eds.), Anthropocene encounters. New directions in green political thinking (pp. 171–190). Cambridge University Press.
33.
GiddensA. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Polity.
34.
GillespieA. (2018). The long road to sustainability. Oxford University Press.
35.
GoldsmithE. (1974). Blueprint for survival. New American Library.
36.
GrayJ. (2009). False dawn: The delusions of global capitalism. Granta Books.
37.
GrunwaldA. (2018). Diverging pathways to overcoming the environmental crisis: A critique of eco-modernism from a technology assessment perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(2), 1854–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.212
38.
HällmarkK. (2023). Politicization after the ‘end of nature’: The prospect of ecomodernism. European Journal of Social Theory, 26(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310221103759
39.
HardinG. (1977). The tragedy of the commons. In HardinG.BadenJ. (Eds.), Managing the commons (pp. 16–30). W. H. Freeman and Company.
40.
HartogP. (2017). Regimes of historicity. Presentism and experiences of time. Columbia University Press.
41.
HeiseU. (2017). Imagining extinction: The cultural meanings of endangered species. The University of Chicago Press.
KassiolaJ. (2002). The “tragedy” of modernity: How environmental limits and the environmental crisis produce the need for postmodern values and institutions. In KassiolaJ. (Ed.), Explorations in environmental political theory: Thinking about what we value (pp. 14–36). Routledge.
48.
KayJ.KingM. (2020). Radical uncertainty. Decision-making for an unknowable future. W. W. Norton & Company.
49.
KoselleckR. (2004). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Columbia University Press.
50.
LaraD. (2025). Making sense of ecomodernism: Normative implications and rational consumption. Environmental Politics, 1–21(Ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2024.2437879
51.
LatourB. (2020). La plasticidad del orden mundial. El País, 4th May.
52.
LatourB.SchultzN. (2022). On the emergence of an ecological class: A memo. Polity Press.
53.
LehnerF. (2023). Deliberative governance for sustainable development. An innovative solution for environment, economy and society. Routledge.
54.
LeighP. (2015). Austerity ecology & the collapse-porn addicts: A defence of growth, progress, industry and stuff. Zero Books.
LusardiR.StefanoT. (2020). The juggernaut of modernity collapses. The crisis of social planification in the post COVID-19 era. Frontiers in Sociology, 23(5), 611885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.611885
57.
MarrisE. (2021). Wild souls: Freedom and flourishing in the non-human world. Bloomsbury.
58.
McNeillW. (1998). Plagues and peoples. Anchor Books.
59.
MerkelW. (2023). Im Zwielicht: Zerbrechlichkeit und Resilienz der Demokratie im 21. Jahrhundert. Campus Verlag.
60.
MilbrathL. (1985). Environmentalists: Vanguard for a new society. State University of New York Press.
61.
MitmanG. (2019). Reflections on the plantationocene: A conversation with donna haraway and anna tsing, Edge Effects Magazine, June 18th, 2–19.
62.
OphulsW. (1977). Ecology and the politics of scarcity. W.H. Freeman and Company.
63.
OswaldM. T.FrommM.BrodaE. (2021). Strategic clustering in right-wing-populism? ‘Green policies’ in Germany and France. Zeitschrift für Vergleiche Politikwissenchsaft, 15, 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00485-6
64.
Pew Research Center. (2023). What the data says about Americans views of climate change. https://pewrsr.ch/3saE1wX
65.
QuilleyS. (2013). De-growth is not a liberal agenda: Relocalisation and the limits to low energy cosmopolitanism. Environmental Values, 22(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725310
66.
ReckwitzA. (2019). Das Ende der Illusionen. Politik, Ökonomie und Kultur in der Spätmoderne. Suhrkamp.
67.
ReckwitzA.RosaH. (2021). Spätmoderne in der Krise. Was leistet die Gesellschaftstheorie?Suhrkamp.
68.
ReddyS. (2006). Claims to expert knowledge and the subversion of democracy. The triumph of risk over uncertainty. Economy and Society, 25(2), 222–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000011
69.
RosaH.DörreK.LessenichS. (2017). Appropriation, activation and acceleration: The escalatory logics of capitalist modernity and the crises of dynamic stabilization. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416657600
70.
RuncimanD. (2013). The confidence trap: A history of democracy in crisis from world war I to the present. Princeton University Press.
SaitoK. (2022). Marx in the ANTHROPOCENE: Towards the idea of degrowth communism.Cambridge University Press.
73.
SchwörerJ.Fernández-GarcíaB. (2024). Climate sceptics or climate nationalists? Understanding and explaining populist radical right Parties’ positions towards climate change (1990–2022). Political Studies, 72(3), 1178–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231176475
74.
ScrantonR. (2015). Learning to die in the anthropocene. Reflections on the end of a civilization. City Light Books.
75.
ServigneP.StevensR. (2015). Comment tout peut s’effrondrer. Petit manuel de collapsologie à l'usage des générations présentes. Seuil.
76.
SoperK. (2020). Post-growth living: For an alternative hedonism. Verso.
77.
StaabP. (2023). Anpassung: Leitmotiv der nächsten Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp.
78.
SymonsJ. (2019). Ecomodernism: Technology, politics, and the climate crisis. Polity Press.
79.
SymonsJ.KarlssonR. (2018). Ecomodernist citizenship: Rethinking political obligations in a climate-changed world. Citizenship Studies, 22(7), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1508414
80.
VirilioP. (2007). The original accident. Malden.
81.
WagnerP. (2012). Modernity: Understanding the present. Polity.
82.
WissenburgM. (2021). The anthropocene and the republic. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24(5), 779–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1698152
83.
WolffR. P.MooreB.MarcuseH. (1969). A critique of pure tolerance. Beacon Press.
84.
XuZ.ChauS. N.ChenX.ZhangJ.LiY.DietzT.WangJ.WinklerJ.FanF.HuangB.LiS.WuS.HerzbergerA.TangY.HongD.LiY.LiuJ. (2020). Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time. Nature, 577, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1846-3
