This article articulates a neo-pragmatist theory of human rights by drawing and expanding upon the American classical pragmatism of G.H. Mead. It characterizes this neo-pragmatist theory of rights by its anti-foundationalist, relational, fictive, and constitutive nature, and begins by providing a reconstruction of Mead’s social pragmatist approach to rights, a contribution systematically ignored by contemporary sociologists of rights. Next, it details the cost of this disciplinary oblivion by examining how much neo-pragmatism, critical theory, and legal consciousness studies have meanwhile gained by engaging with Mead’s work on rights. Finally, it discusses the contributions of this historical-theoretical exercise to the rapidly growing sociology of rights, and shows that by supplementing the neo-Meadian approach with a recent interpretation of Hobbes’s fictional theory of politics, there appear to be substantive gains in the empirical study of the origins, consequences, meaning, and denial of rights.
AbramsP (1988) Notes on the difficulty of studying the state. Journal of Historical Sociology1: 58–89.
2.
AlexanderJC. (2004) Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BellamyR (2007) Political Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BetzJ (1974) George Herbert Mead on human rights. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society10: 199–223.
5.
BlumerH (1969) Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BourdieuP ([1980] 1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BourdieuP ([1986] 1987) The force of law. The Hastings Law Journal38: 814–53.
8.
BourdieuP ([1989] 1998) The State Nobility. Cambridge: Polity.
9.
BourdieuP (1994) Rethinking the state. Sociological Theory12: 1–18.
10.
BrighamR (1996) The Constitution of Interests. New York: New York University Press.
11.
ConnellRW (1995) Sociology and human rights. Journal of Sociology31: 25–9.
12.
CookGA (1993) George Herbert Mead. Urbana: University of Illinois.
13.
DeflemM (2008) Sociology of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DiMaggioPPowellW (eds) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
DunnRG (1997) Self, identity, and difference. The Sociological Quarterly38: 687–705.
16.
EdelmanM (1964) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
17.
EdelmanM (1971) Politics as Symbolic Action. New York: Academic Press.
18.
EdelmanM (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
EngelDMMungerFW (2003) Rights of Inclusion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
EwickPSaratA (2004) Hidden in plain view. Law and Social Inquiry29: 439–63.
21.
EwickPSilbeySS (1998) The Common Place of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
FestensteinM (1997) Pragmatism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
23.
FraserN (1997) Justice Interruptus. New York: Routledge.
24.
FraserN (2003) Distorted by all recognition: A rejoinder to Axel Honneth. In: FraserNHonnethARedistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso, pp. 198–236.
25.
FraserNHonnethA (2003) Redistribution or Recognition?London: Verso.
26.
GrossN (2009) A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review74: 358–79.
27.
HabermasJ ([1981] 1986) The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols. Cambridge: Polity.
28.
HabermasJ ([1992]1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity.
29.
HileyDR (2011) Cultural politics, political innovation, and the work of human rights. Contemporary Pragmatism8: 47–60.
30.
HonnethA ([1985]1991) The Critique of Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
HonnethA (1995) The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
HonnethA (2003) Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser. In: FraserNHonnethARedistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso, pp. 110–97.
33.
JoasH ([1980] 1985) G.H. Mead. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
JoasH ([1992] 1996) The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
JoasH ([1997] 2000) The Genesis of Values. Cambridge: Polity.
36.
JoasH (2005) Max Weber and the origin of human rights: A study on cultural innovation. In: CamicCGorskiPTrubekD (eds) Max Weber’s ‘Economy and Society’: A Critical Companion. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 366–82.
37.
JoasH (2011) Die Sakralität der Person. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
38.
KoningsM (2010) The pragmatic sources of modern power. European Journal of Sociology51: 55–91.
39.
LarsonEW (2004) Institutionalizing legal consciousness. Law and Society Review38: 737–67.
40.
LatourB ([2002] 2010) The Making of Law. Cambridge: Polity.
41.
LuhmannN (1992) The form of writing. Stanford Literature Review9: 25–42.
42.
MarkellP (2003) Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
McCannMW (2006) Law and social movements. Annual Review of Law and Social Science2: 1–22.
44.
MeadGH (1910) Social consciousness and the consciousness of meaning. Psychological Bulletin7: 397–405.
45.
MeadGH (1932) The Physical Thing. A collection of two different manuscripts published for the first time in 1932, as a supplementary essay to The Philosophy of the Present ([1932] 2002).
46.
MeadGH ([1934] 1967) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
MeadGH (2011) G.H. Mead: A Reader, ed. FCSilvaLondon: Routledge.
48.
MerrySE (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
MillsCW (1966) Sociology and Pragmatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
PetersenAWilligR (2002) An interview with Axel Honneth: The role of sociology in the theory of recognition. European Journal of Social Theory5: 265–77.
51.
PettitP (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
52.
PiersonP (2000) The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance13: 475–99.
53.
PitkinH (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54.
SaratA (1990) ‘…the law is all over’: power, resistance, and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor. Yale Journal of Law and Humanities2: 343–79.
55.
ScheingoldS ([1974] 2007) The Politics of Rights. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
56.
ScheppeleKL (1994) Legal theory and social theory. Annual Review of Sociology20: 383–406.
57.
ScheppeleKL (2004) Constitutional ethnography. Scholarship at Penn Law. Paper56.
58.
SewellW (1992) A theory of structure. American Journal of Sociology98: 1–29.
59.
ShalinD (1986) Pragmatism and social interactionism. American Sociological Review51: 9–29.
60.
ShalinD (1992) Critical theory and the pragmatist challenge. American Journal of Sociology96: 237–79.
61.
SilvaFC (2007) G.H. Mead: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
62.
SilvaFC (2008) Mead and Modernity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
63.
SilversteinH (1996) Unleashing Rights. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
64.
SingerB (1999) Pragmatism, Rights, and Democracy. New York: Fordham University Press.
65.
SjobergGGillEWilliamsN (2001) A sociology of human rights. Social Problems48: 11–47.
66.
SkinnerQ (1969) Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory8: 3–53.
67.
SkinnerQ (2002) Visions of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
SkinnerQ (2010) The sovereign state: a genealogy. In: SkinnerQKalmoH (eds) Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26–46.
69.
SomersMRRobertsC (2008) Toward a new sociology of rights. Annual Review of Law and Social Science4: 385–426.
70.
ThompsonEP (1978) The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.
71.
TillyC (1998) Where do rights come from? In: SckopolT (ed.) Democracy, Revolution and History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
72.
TurnerBS (ed.) (1993) Outline of a theory of human rights. Sociology27: 489–512.
73.
TurnerBS (1997) A Neo-Hobbesian theory of human rights: A reply to Malcolm Waters. Sociology31: 565–71.
74.
TurnerBS (2006) Vulnerability and Human Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
75.
TurnerS (1994) The Social Theory of Practices. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
76.
TushnetM (1992) Civil rights and social rights: The future of the reconstruction amendments. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review25: 1207–19.
77.
VieiraMB (2009) The Elements of Representation in Hobbes. Leiden: Brill.
78.
WolinS (1989) The Presence of the Past. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
79.
WoodiwissA (2005) Human Rights. London: Routledge.
80.
YoungIM (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
81.
ZiviK (2011) Making Rights Claims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
