This article explores the elective affinities between Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and the sociology of critical capacities. It argues that these two research programmes can be understood as symmetrical twins. We show the extent to which the exchange between Bruno Latour and Luc Boltanski has influenced their respective theoretical developments. Three strong encounters between the twin research programmes may be distinguished. The first encounter concerns explanations for social change. The second encounter focuses on the status of objects and their relationship to places. The third encounter is about the concept of critique. Drawing on their long-term mutual readings, we gain insight into how pleas for symmetrical analysis raised in response to Bourdieu’s theory of fields have evolved within both ANT and the sociology of critical capacity. We conclude by relating the development of the respective research programmes to the issue of disciplinary boundaries.
BénatouïlT (1999) A tale of two sociologies: the critical and the pragmatic stance in contemporary French sociology. European Journal of Social Theory1(2): 379–96.
2.
deBlic D (2000) La sociologie politique et morale de Luc Boltanski. Raisons politiques3: 149–58.
3.
BloorD (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4.
BloorD (1999) Anti-Latour. Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Sciences30(1): 81–112.
5.
BoltanskiL (1982) Les cadres. La formation d'un groupe social. Paris: Minuit.
6.
BoltanskiL (1990a) L'amour et la justice comme compétences: trois essais de sociologie de l’action. Paris: Métailie.
7.
BoltanskiL (1990b) Sociologie critique et sociologie de la critique. Politix10–11: 124–34.
BoltanskiL (2002) Nécessité et justification. Revue économique53(2): 275–89.
10.
BoltanskiL (2004) La condition foetale. Une sociologie de l'avortement et de l'engendrement. Paris: Gallimard.
11.
BoltanskiL (2008) Rendre la réalité inacceptable. A propos de la production de l'idéologie dominante, Paris: Demopolis.
12.
BoltanskiLChiapelloE (2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso[First French edition: Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris, Gallimard 1999].
13.
BoltanskiLDarréYSchiltzM-A (1984) La Dénonciation. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales51: 3–40.
14.
BoltanskiLThévenotL (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press[First French edition: De la justification. Les Economies de la grandeur Paris, Gallimard 1991].
15.
BourdieuP (1975) The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information / Information sur les Sciences Sociales14: 19–47.
16.
BourdieuP (1979) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood.
18.
CallonM (1998) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
CallonM (1999) Ni intellectuel engagé, ni intellectuel dégagé: la double stratégie de l’attachement et du détachement. Sociologie du travail41(1): 65–78.
20.
CallonMLatourB (1981) Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr-CetinaKCicourelA (eds) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. New York: Routledge.
21.
CohenS (1999) Reading science studies writing. In: BiagoliM (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
22.
CollinsH MYearleyS (1992a) Epistemological chicken. In: PickeringA (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
CollinsH MYearleyS (1992b) Journey into space. In: PickeringA (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
DodierN (1993) Action as a combination of ‘common’ worlds. Sociological Review41(3): 556–71.
25.
DodierN (2005) L’espace et le mouvement du sens critique. Annales. Histoire et sciences sociales60: 7–31.
26.
DosseF (1998) Empire of Meaning: The Humanization of the Social Sciences. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
FreudenthalG (1990) Science studies in France: a sociological view. Social Studies of Science20(2): 353–69.
28.
FuchsSMarshallD A (1998) Across the great (and small!) divides. Soziale Systeme4: 6–31.
29.
GingrasY (1995) Following scientists through society? Yes, but at arm’s length! In: BuchwaldJ Z (ed.) Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
GomartE (2002) Methadone: six effects in search of a substance. Social Studies of Science32(1): 93–135.
31.
GuggenheimM (2012) Laboratizing and Delaboratizing the World: Changing Sociological Concepts for Places of Knowledge Production. History of the Human Sciences, forthcoming.
32.
HackingI (1999) The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
HarmanG (2009) Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Seddon: re.press.
34.
HennionALatourB (1993) Objet d’art, objet de science. Note sur les limites de l’anti-fétichisme. Sociologie de l’art6: 7–24.
35.
JagdS (2004) Laurent Thévenot and the French Convention School: a short introduction. Economic Sociology5(3): 2–9.
36.
Knorr-CetinaK D (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
37.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
LatourB (1988a) The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
LatourB (1988b) The politics of explanation: an alternative. In: WoolgarS (ed.) Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Sage.
40.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
LatourB (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
LatourB (2000) When things strike back: a possible contribution of science studies to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology51(1): 105–23.
43.
LatourB (2002a) Gabriel Tarde and the end of the social. In: JoyceP (ed.) Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
44.
LatourB (2002b) La fabrique du droit. Une ethnographie du conseil d’état. Paris: La Découverte.
45.
LatourB (2004a) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
LatourB (2004b) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry2: 226–48.
47.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LatourB (2009) Dialogue sur Deux Systèmes de Sociologie. In: BreviglieriMLafayeCTromD (eds) Compétences critiques, sens de la justice. Paris: Gallimard.
50.
LatourBWoolgarS (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.
51.
LawJHassardJ (eds) (1999) Actor-Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
LenoirT (1994) Was the last turn the right turn? The semiotic turn and A. J. Greimas. Configurations2: 119–36.
53.
LynchM (1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
54.
LynchM (1991) Pictures of nothing? Visual construals in social theory. Sociological Theory9(1): 1–21.
55.
McClellanC (1996) The economic consequences of Bruno Latour. Social Epistemology10(2): 193–209.
56.
MertonR K (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
NachiM (2006) Introduction à la sociologie pragmatique. Paris: Armand Colin.
58.
NowotnyH (1990) Actor-networks vs. science as self-organising system: a comparative view of two constructivist approaches. In: Krohn W etal. (eds) Self-organization: Portrait of a Scientific Revolution. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
59.
PotthastJ (2001) Review essay: Der Kapitalismus ist kritisierbar. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme und das Forschungsprogramm der Soziologie der Kritik. Berliner Journal für Soziologie11(4): 551–62.
60.
PotthastJ (2004) Soziologie und Kritik. Ein Theorievergleich zum Problem der Politisierung sozialer Ungleichheit. In: EbrechtJHillebrandtF (eds) Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis. Er-klärunkskraft – Anwendungen – Perspektiven (2nd rev. edn). Wiesbaden: VS.
61.
ShapinSSchafferS (1985) Leviathan and the Air Pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
SilberI F (2003) Pragmatic sociology as cultural sociology: beyond repertoire theory?European Journal of Social Theory6(4): 427–49.
63.
ThévenotL (1997) Un gouvernement par les normes. In: ConeinBThévenotL (eds) Cognition et information en société. Raisons pratiques, vol. 8. Paris: EHESS.
64.
ThévenotL (2001) Organized complexity: conventions of coordination and the composition of economic arrangements. European Journal of Social Theory4(4): 405–25.
65.
ThévenotLMoodyMLafayeC (2000) Forms of valuing nature: arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In: LamontMThévenotL (eds) Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
VandenbergheFDelantyG (2006) The age of Epigones: post-Bourdieusian social theory in France. In: DelantyG (ed.) Handbook of Contemporary European Social Theory. London: Routledge.
67.
WagnerP (1999) After justification: Repertoires of evaluation and the sociology of modernity. European Journal of Social Theory2(3): 341–57.
