BergA-J (1994) A gendered socio-technical construction: The smart house. In: CockburnCFürst-DilicR (eds) Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe. Buckingham: Open University Press, 165–180.
2.
BergA-JLieM (1995) Feminism and constructivism: Do artifacts have gender?Science, Technology, & Human Values20: 332–351.
3.
BraidottiR (2002) Metamorphoses. Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
CasperMClarkeA (1998) Making the pap smear into the ‘right tool’ for the job: Cervical cancer screening in the USA, circa 1945–95. Social Studies of Science28: 255–290.
5.
CockburnC (1992) The circuit of technology: Gender, identity and power. In: SilverstoneRHirschE (eds) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge, 18–25.
6.
CockburnCOrmrodS (1993) Gender and Technology in the Making. London: Sage.
7.
GrintKGillR (1995) The Gender–Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor & Francis.
8.
HarawayD (1991) A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In: HarawayD, Simians, Cyborgs and Woman: The Reinvention of Nature. New York and London: Routledge, 149–181.
9.
HarawayD (2004) The Haraway Reader. New York and London: Routledge.
10.
KleifTFaulknerW (2004) I am not the same person! A user study of a women-only training course. In: OudshoornNRommesEvon SlootenI (eds) Strategies of Inclusion: Gender in the Information Society Vol. III, Surveys of Women’s User Experience, Report 2004–66. Trondheim, Norway: NTNU, Centre for Technology and Society, 107–136.
11.
LagesenVA (2005) Extreme make-over? The making of gender and computer science. STS-report 71/2005. Trondheim: Centre for Technology and Society, NTNU.
12.
LagesenVA (2007) The strength of numbers? Strategies to include women into computer science. Social Studies of Science37: 67–92.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
LatourB (2005) Re-Assembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
LatourB (2010) Coming out as a philosopher. Social Studies of Science40: 599–608.
17.
LawJ (1999) After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In: LawJHassardJ (eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell and Sociological Review, 1–13.
18.
LieM (1995) Technology and masculinity: The case of the computer. European Journal of Women’s Studies2: 379–394.
19.
OrmrodS (1994) Feminist sociology and methodology: Leaky black boxes in gender/technology relations. In: GillRGrintK (eds) The Gender–Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor and Francis, 31–48.
20.
OudshoornNPinchT (eds) (2003) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
OudshoornNSætnanALieM (2002) On gender and things: Reflections on an exhibition on gendered artifacts. Women’s Studies International Forum25: 471–483.
22.
SingletonV (1995) Networking constructions of gender and constructing gender networks. In: GrintKGillR (eds) The Gender–Technology Relation. London: Taylor & Francis, 146–173.
23.
SingletonV (1996) Feminism, sociology of scientific knowledge and postmodernism: Politics, theory and me. Social Studies of Science26: 445–468.
24.
SørensenKHFaulknerWRommesE (eds) (2011) Technologies of Inclusion. Gender in the Information Society. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.
25.
StarSL (1991) Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In: LawJ (ed) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London and New York: Routledge.
