Previous research showed that reading about a rape impaired the self-esteem (SE) of women low in rape myth acceptance (RMA), whereas an opposite trend emerged for high-RMA women (Bohner, Weisbrod, Raymond, Barzvi, & Schwarz, 1993). In an extended replication, 156 female students who had not been targets of sexual violence and were either high or low in RMA participated. To prime individual versus gender-related self-aspects, participants were asked to describe themselves either as a unique individual or `as a woman'; to manipulate rape salience, they then read either a neutral text or a text about a rape. Subsequently, both individual SE and gender-related collective SE were assessed. When rape was salient, low-RMA women showed a decrease in that aspect of SE that had previously been activated, with a stronger effect overall on collective SE, whereas high-RMA women's SE again was not impaired. These findings replicate and extend previous results.
Abrams, D. (1996). Social identity, self as structure and self as process. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 143-167). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
2.
Bohner, G. (1998). Vergewaltigungsmythen: Sozialpsychologische Untersuchungen über täterentlastende und opferfeindliche Überzeugungen im Bereich sexueller Gewalt [Rape myths: Social psychological studies on attitudes that exonerate the assailant and blame the victim of sexual violence]. Landau, Germany: Verlag Empirische Padagogik.
3.
Bohner, G. , & Schwarz, N. (1996). The threat of rape: Its psychological impact on nonvictimized women. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 162-175). New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Bohner, G. , Siebler, F., Sturm, S., Effler, D., Litters, M., Reinhard, M.-A., & Rutz, S. (1998). Rape myth acceptance and accessibility of the gender category. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 67-79.
5.
Bohner, G. , & Sturm, S. (1997). Evaluative Aspekte sozialer Identität bei Frauen und Männern: Eine Skala des Kollektiven Selbstwerts in bezug auf das Geschlecht (KSW-G) [Evaluative aspects of social identity in women and men: Presentation of a German scale of collective self-esteem concerning gender]. Psychologische Beitrage, 39, 322-335.
6.
Bohner, G. , Weisbrod, C., Raymond, P., Barzvi, A., & Schwarz, N. (1993). Salience of rape affects self-esteem: The moderating role of gender and rape myth acceptance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 561-579.
7.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports of rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
8.
Costin, F. (1985). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 319-325.
9.
Costin, F. , & Schwarz, N. (1987). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles: A four-nation study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 46-56.
10.
Fleming, J. S. , & Watts, W. A. (1980). The dimensionality of self-esteem: Some results for a college sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 921-929.
11.
Herbert, T. B. , & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1992). Negative social reactions to victims: An overview of responses and their determinants. In L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp, & M.J. Lerner (Eds.), Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 497-518). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Hormuth, S. E. , & Lalli, M. (1988). Eine Skala zur Erfassung der bereichsspezifischen Selbstzufriedenheit [A scale for assessing domain-specific satisfaction with the self]. Diagnostica, 34, 148-166.
13.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
14.
Lerner, M. J. , & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer's reaction to the `innocent victim': Compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203-210.
15.
Luhtanen, R. , & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
16.
Perloff, L. , & Fetzer, B. K. (1986). Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 502-510.
17.
Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. New York: Vintage Books.
18.
Schwarz, N. , & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 217-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Stapel, D. A. , Reicher, S. D., & Spears, R. (1994). Social identity, availability and the perception of risk. Social Cognition, 12, 1-17.
20.
Stapel, D. , & Schwarz, N. (1998). The Republican who did not want to become president: Colin Powell's impact on evaluations of the Republican Party and Bob Dole. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 690-698.
21.
Tabone, C. , Pardine, P., & Salzano, J. (1992). Why do women accept the rape myth? Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA, April.
22.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups. New York: Academic Press.
23.
Trafimow, D. , Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655.
24.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
25.
Ward, C. A. (1995). Attitudes toward rape. London: Sage.
26.
Weis, K. (1982). Die Vergewaltigung und ihre Opfer: Eine viktimologische Untersuchung zur geseltschaftlichen Bewertung und individuellen Betroffenheit. Stuttgart: Enke.
