The importance of antiprejudice in protesting and collective action for disadvantaged groups’ rights

Abstract

In the past decade, collective action advocating for a disadvantaged group’s rights has increased exponentially. However, only a fraction of supporters of a disadvantaged group’s rights takes collective action. What drives some to take collective action for a disadvantaged group’s rights while others do not? We argue that antiprejudice, the belief that one should proactively fight discrimination and injustice faced by a group, is a critical component of promoting collective action for that group and differentiating between those who are engaged and those who are not. Across field and online studies, we examined antiprejudice’s role in driving protesting and intentions to take collective action for a disadvantaged group’s rights among causes associated with liberals (e.g., racial equality) and conservatives (e.g., pro-life rights). Antiprejudice repeatedly emerged as a key construct for differentiating between protestors and non-protestors and for predicting collective action intentions.

Keywords

collective action protesting antiprejudice antiracism antisexism anti-xenophobia pro-life rights

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam-Troian

Çelebi

Mahfud

(2020). “Return of the repressed”: Exposure to police violence increases protest and self-sacrifice intentions for the Yellow Vests. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(8), 1171–1186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220920707

Adra

Baumert

(2020). What they think of us: Meta-beliefs and solidarity-based collective action among the advantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2675

Aldana

Bañales

Richards-Schuster

(2019). Youth anti-racist engagement: Conceptualization, development, and validation of an anti-racism action scale. Adolescent Research Review, 4(4), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00113-1

Amatulli

Saltos

G. L.

(2018). These are the biggest marches in U.S. history. Huffington Post. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/biggest-marches-in-ushistory_us_5ab3db65e4b008c9e5f527f1

American Civil Liberties Union. (2023, March 24). Mapping attacks on LGBTQ rights in U.S. state legislatures. https://www.aclu.org/legislative-attacks-on-lgbtq-rights

Arend

M. G.

Schäfer

(2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000195

Ayanian

A. J.

Tausch

(2016). How risk perception shapes collective action intentions in repressive contexts: A study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post-coup uprising. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12164

Ayanian

A. H.

Tausch

Acar

Y. G.

Chayinska

Cheung

W. Y.

Lukyanova

(2021). Resistance in repressive contexts: A comprehensive test of psychological predictors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 912–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000285

Bartoş

S. E.

Hegarty

(2018). Negotiating theory when doing practice: A systematic review of qualitative research on interventions to reduce homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(9), 1262–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2018.1500780

10.

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

11.

Ben

Kelly

Paradies

(2020). Contemporary anti-racism. In Solomos

(Ed.), Routledge international handbook of contemporary racisms (pp. 205–215). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351047326-16

12.

Carter

(2013). Online popular anti-sexism political action in the UK and USA: The importance of collaborative anger for social change. In Carter

Steiner

McLaughlin

(Eds.), The Routledge companion to media & gender (pp. 661–671). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203066911-70

13.

Caruso

(2017, November 15). Count love project reveals protest pattern. The Brink. http://www.bu.edu/articles/2017/counting-american-protests/

14.

Chamberlin

K. G.

Plant

E. A.

(2023). Systemic sexism recognition and antisexism encourage gender equality activism: An adaptation of bystander intervention theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(10), 911–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12976

15.

Chandler

C. R.

Tsai

Y. M.

(2001). Social factors influencing immigration attitudes: An analysis of data from the General Social Survey. The Social Science Journal, 38(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(01)00106-9

16.

Charlesworth

T. E.

Sanjeev

Hatzenbuehler

M. L.

Banaji

M. R.

(2023). Identifying and predicting stereotype change in large language corpora: 72 groups, 115 years (1900–2015), and four text sources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(5), 969–990. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000354

17.

Chenoweth

Pressman

. (2019, February). The 2019 Women’s March was bigger than you think. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/02/01/the-2019-womens-march-was-bigger-than-you-think/

18.

Cialdini

R. B.

(2009). We have to break up. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01091.x

19.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5

20.

Eagly

A. H.

Chaiken

(1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

21.

Elshaer

I. A.

Azazz

A. M.

Fayyad

Kooli

Fouad

A. M.

Hamdy

Fathy

E. A

. (2025). Consumer boycotts and fast-food chains: Economic consequences and reputational damage. Societies, 15(5), 114. DOI: 10.3390/soc1505114

22.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlations and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

23.

Fraley

R. C.

Vazire

(2014). The N-pact factor: Evaluating the quality of empirical journals with regards to sample size and statistical power. PLoS One, 9(10), e109019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109019

24.

Gerber

A. S.

Huber

G. A.

Doherty

Dowling

C. M.

Raso

S. E.

(2011). Personality traits and participation in political processes. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 692–706. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000399

25.

Gillion

Posey

(2019). Minority protest and the early stages of governmental responsiveness in the electoral process. In Lee

F. E.

McCarty

(Eds.), Can America govern itself? (pp. 93–119). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108667457

26.

Gramlich

(2017, December 28). 10 things we learned about gender issues in the U.S. in 2017. Fact Tank. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/28/10-things-we-learned-about-gender-issues-in-the-u-s-in-2017/

27.

Han

Riddell

J. R.

Piquero

A. R.

(2023). Anti-Asian American hate crimes spike during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3–4), 3513–3533. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221107056

28.

Hooghe

Marien

(2012). How to reach member of parliament? Citizens and members of parliament on the effectiveness of political participation repertoires. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(3), 536–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss057

29.

Hooper

Coughlan

Mullen

. (2008). Evaluating model fit: A synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In Brown

(Ed.), 7th European conference on research methodology for business and management studies (195–200). Regent’s College in London, UK.

30.

Horowitz

J. M.

Parker

Stepler

(2017, October 18). Wide partisan gaps in U.S. over how far the country has come on gender equality. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/10/18/wide-partisan-gaps-in-u-s-over-how-far-the-country-has-come-on-gender-equality/

31.

HRC Staff. (2022, October 1). The Human Rights Campaign scales efforts to mobilize voters for 2022 midterm elections as extremist politicians escalate attacks on the rights of Arizonans. Human Rights Campaign. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/the-human-rights-campaign-scales-efforts-to-mobilize-voters-for-2022-midterm-elections-as-extremist-politicians-escalate-attacks-on-the-rights-of-arizonans

32.

Human Rights Watch. (2019, December 9). The enduring power of protest. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/12/09/enduring-power-protest

33.

Jost

J. T.

Becker

Osborne

Badaan

(2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633

34.

Jost

J. T.

Chaikalis-Petritsis

Abrams

Sidanius

Van Der Toorn

Bratt

. (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 197–208. DOI: 10.1177/0146167211422533

35.

Kauffman

L. A.

(2018, May 6). We are living through a golden age of protest. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/06/protest-trump-direct-action-activism

36.

Kawakami

Karmali

Vaccarino

(2019). Confronting intergroup prejudice: Predicted and actual responses to racism and sexism. In Mallett

R. K.

Montieth

M. J.

(Eds.), Confronting prejudice and discrimination: The science of changing minds and behaviors (pp. 3–28). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814715-3.00001-1

37.

Kendi

I. X.

(2019). How to be an antiracist. Random House.

38.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

39.

LaCosse

Krusemark

D. R.

Foltz

Plant

E. A.

(2021). Antiracism: Development and validation of a measure designed to identify White Americans who proactively fight to end discrimination toward Black Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(1), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211048886

40.

Leung

Perkins

L. N.

(2021, May 19). Count Love demonstration statistics. Count Love. https://countlove.org/statistics.html

41.

Lorah

(2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-018-0061-2

42.

Mackie

D. M.

Devos

Smith

E. R.

(2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.602

43.

Mazumder

(2018). The persistent effect of U.S. civil rights protests on political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 922–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajp.122384

44.

Mervosh

Hauser

(2018, October 22). At rallies and online, trans people say they #wontbeerased. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/22/us/transgender-reaction-rally.html

45.

Mikołajczak

Becker

J. C.

(2019). What is (un)fair? Political ideology and collective action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(2), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i2.1230

46.

Mitton-Kukner

Kearns

L. L.

Tompkins

(2016). Pre-service educators and anti-oppressive pedagogy: Interrupting and challenging LGBTQ oppression in schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2015.1020047

47.

Möckel

. (2018). The material culture of human rights. Consumer products, boycotts and the transformation of human rights activism in the 1970s and 1980s. International Journal for History , Culture and Modernity, 6(1), 76-104. DOI: 10.18352/hcm.540

48.

Mortensen

C. R.

Cialdini

R. B.

(2010). Full-cycle social psychology for theory and application. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1751-9004.2009.00239.x

49.

Allore

H. G.

Trentalange

Monin

J. K.

Levy

B. R.

(2015). Increasing negativity of age stereotypes across 200 years: Evidence from a database of 400 million words. PLoS One, 10(2), e0117086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117086

50.

Nguyen

T. T.

Criss

Dwivedi

Huang

Keralis

Hsu

Phan

Nguyen

L. H.

Yardi

Glymour

M. M.

Allen

A. M.

Chae

D. H.

Gee

G. C.

Nguyen

Q. C.

(2020). Exploring shifts in anti-Asian sentiment with the emergence of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197032

51.

O’Neil

(2018, June 21). Immigration issues: Public opinion on family separation, DACA, and a border wall. AEI. https://www.aei.org/politics-and-public-opinion/immigration-issues-public-opinion-on-family-separation-daca-and-a-border-wall/

52.

Osborne

Jost

J. T.

Becker

J. C.

Badaan

Sibley

C. G.

(2019). Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2522

53.

Oser

(2022). Protest as one political act in individuals’ participation repertoires: Latent class analysis and political participant types. American Behavioral Scientist, 66(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211021633

54.

Paluck

E. L.

Cialdini

R. B.

(2014). Field research methods. In Reis

Judd

(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 81–97). Cambridge University Press.

55.

Paradies

(2016). Whither anti-racism? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1096410

56.

Parker

M. T.

Janoff-Bulman

(2013). Lessons from morality-based social identity: The power of outgroup “hate,” not just ingroup “love”. Social Justice Research, 26, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0175-6

57.

Pew Research Center. (2017, October 5). Race, immigration and discrimination. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/05/4-race-immigration-and-discrimination/

58.

Plant

E. A.

Devine

P. G.

(2001). Responses to other-imposed pro-Black pressure: Acceptance or backlash? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1478

59.

Potvin

(2019). Straight teacher allies: Lessons from compassionate educators. In Jule

(Ed.), The compassionate educator: Understanding social issues and the ethics of care in Canadian schools (pp. 73–90). Canadian Scholars.

60.

R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/

61.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.

62.

Reimer

N. K.

Becker

J. C.

Benz

Christ

Dhont

Klocke

Neji

Rychlowska

Schmid

Hewstone

(2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478

63.

Rosen

(2019, May 30). A fetal right to life? Abortion and the constitution part 2 [Audio podcast episode]. In We the people podcast. National Constitution Center. https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/podcast/a-fetal-right-to-life-abortion-and-the-constitution-part-2

64.

Rosenberg

G. N.

(2004). The 1964 Civil Rights Act: The crucial role of social movements in the enactment and implementation of anti-discrimination law. Louis ULJ, 49(4), 1147–1154.

65.

Sabucedo

J. M.

Dono

Alzate

Seoane

(2018). The importance of protesters’ morals: Moral obligation as a key variable to understand collective action. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00418

66.

Sabucedo

J. M.

Dono

Grigoryev

Gómez-Román

Alzate

(2019). Axiological-Identitary Collective Action Model (AICAM): A new integrative perspective in the analysis of protest. PLoS One, 14(6), e0218350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218350

67.

Sarmiento

I. G.

(2020, January 18). Women’s march draws a smaller, but passionate crowd. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/01/18/797638115/womens-march-draws-a-smaller-but-passionate-crowd

68.

Satterthwaite

F. E.

(1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(6), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3002019

69.

Shaffer

J. A.

DeGeest

(2016). Tackling the problem of construct proliferation. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 80–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115598239

70.

Shrestha

(2020). Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 39–32. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-8-2-1

71.

Stets

J. E.

Leik

R. K.

(1993). Attitudes about abortion and varying attitude structures. Social Science Research, 22(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1993.1013

72.

Stewart

A. L.

(2017). Men’s collective action willingness: Testing different theoretical models of protesting gender inequality for women and men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(4), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000068

73.

Van Zomeren

. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12031

74.

Van Zomeren

Kutlaca

Turner-Zwinkels

. (2018) Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the social identity model of collective action, European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 122–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347

75.

Van Zomeren

Leach

C. W.

Spears

. (2010). Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.006

76.

Van Zomeren

Postmes

Spears

. (2008a). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

77.

Van Zomeren

Postmes

Spears

. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x

78.

Van Zomeren

Spears

Fischer

A. H.

Leach

C. W

. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649

79.

Van Zomeren

Spears

Leach

C. W

. (2008b). Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: Does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X231091

80.

Vandermaas-Peeler

Cox

Najle

Fisch-Friedman

Griffin

Jones

(2018, May 24). American democracy in crisis: Civic engagement, young adult activism, and the 2018 midterm elections. Public Religion Research Institute. https://www.prri.org/research/american-democracy-in-crisis-civic-engagement-young-adult-activism-and-the-2018-midterm-elections/

81.

Wang

F. K.-H.

(2022, April 11). How violence against Asian Americans has grown and how to stop it, according to activists. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/a-year-after-atlanta-and-indianapolis-shootings-targeting-asian-americans-activists-say-we-cant-lose-momentum

82.

Zamudio Sosa

Montero-Lopéz Lena

. (2022). Emociones, obligación moral y eficacia colectiva en la consulta popular para enjuiciar a expresidentes. Revista Digital Internacional de Psicología y Ciencia Social, 8(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.0.87.130/j.rdipycs.unam.e.8.01.2022.419

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB