Social identity theory hypothesizes that ingroup positive distinctiveness serves as a source of self-esteem that in turn propels individuals to favor ingroups over outgroups. The current meta-analysis extends past reviews of this hypothesis by testing if (a) self-esteem is differentially related to ingroup versus outgroup evaluations, and (b) the self-esteem–outgroup evaluation relation is moderated by four theoretically driven factors. A total of 103 effect sizes measured the self-esteem and outgroup derogation relation (N = 15,764) and the self-esteem and ingroup liking relation (N = 15,741). High self-esteem was associated with strong ingroup liking and, to a lesser extent, strong outgroup liking. Regarding the second goal, moderator analyses of the relation between self-esteem and outgroup evaluations (up to 71 effect sizes) revealed four patterns: the relation emerged when personal self-esteem was measured, real groups were targeted, low-status groups judged high-status groups, and there was no domain match between self-esteem and the outgroup.
AbersonC. L.HealyM.RomeroV. (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_04
2.
AbramsD.HoggM. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180403
3.
AbramsD.HoggM. A. (2010). Social identity and self-categorization. In DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. M. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 179–193). Sage.
4.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
5.
AmiotC. E.HornseyM. J. (2010). Collective self-esteem contingency and its role in predicting intergroup bias. Self and Identity, 9(1), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860802605895
ArslanC. (2009). Anger, self-esteem, and perceived social support in adolescence. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 37(4), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.4.555
8.
BaumeisterR. F.SmartL.BodenJ. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103(4), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.5
9.
BettencourtB. A.CharltonK.DorrN.HumeD. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 520–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.520
10.
BilligM.TajfelH. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420030103
11.
BlaineB.CrockerJ. (1993). Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive and negative events. An integrative review. In BaumeisterR. F. (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 55–85). Plenum Press.
12.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
13.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(6), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240603
14.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
15.
BrowningC. (1992). Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland. HarperCollins Publishers.
16.
CafriG.KromreyJ. D.BrannickM. T. (2010). A meta-meta-analysis: Empirical review of statistical power, Type I error rates, effect sizes, and model selection of meta-analyses published in psychology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(2), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171003680187
CrockerJ.BlaineB.LuhtanenR. (1993). Prejudice, intergroup behaviour and self-esteem: Enhancement and protection motives. In HoggM. A.AbramsD. (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 52–67). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
19.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.60
20.
CrockerJ.ThompsonL. L.McGrawK. M.IngermanC. (1987). Downward comparison, prejudice, and evaluations of others: Effects of self-esteem and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 907–916. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.5.907
21.
DavisS. C.LemanP. J.BarrettM. (2007). Children’s implicit and explicit ethnic group attitudes, ethnic group identification, and self-esteem. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(5), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407081461
22.
De CremerD.OosterwegelA. (1999). Collective self-esteem, personal self-esteem, and collective efficacy in in-group and outgroup evaluations. Current Psychology, 18(4), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-999-1007-1
23.
DollardJ.MillerN. E.DoobL. W.MowrerO. H.SearsR. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press.
24.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2010). Intergroup bias. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.GardnerL. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1084–1121). John Wiley & Sons.
25.
DunhamY.BaronA. S.BanajiM. R. (2007). Children and social groups: A developmental analysis of implicit consistency in Hispanic Americans. Self and Identity, 6(2–3), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860601115344
26.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
27.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
28.
EhrlichG. A.GramzowR. H. (2015). The politics of affirmation theory: When group-affirmation leads to greater ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1110–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215590986
Falomir-PichastorJ. M.MugnyG. (2009). “I’m not gay . . . I’m a real man!”: Heterosexual men’s gender self-esteem and sexual prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(9), 1233–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209338072
31.
FazioR. H.LedbetterJ. E.Towles-SchwenT. (2000). On the costs of accessible attitudes: Detecting that the attitude object has changed. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78(2), 197–210. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.197
32.
FeinS.SpencerS. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.31
33.
FisherR. A. (1921). On the “probable error” of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron, 1, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331973
34.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628. http://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.48.6.621
35.
FiskeS. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 357–411). McGraw-Hill.
36.
FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (2010). Handbook of social psychology. John Wiley & Sons.
37.
FriendR. M.GilbertJ. (1973). Threat and fear of negative evaluation as determinants of locus of social comparison. Journal of Personality, 41(3), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1973.tb00097.x
38.
GabarrotF.Falomir-PichastorJ. M.MugnyG. (2009). Being similar versus being equal: Intergroup similarity moderates the influence of in-group norms on discrimination and prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X342943
39.
GaertnerL.InskoC. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.1.77
40.
GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. Guilford Press.
41.
GoldhagenD. (1996). Hitler’s willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. Little, Brown and Co.
42.
GonsalkoraleK.CarlisleK.von HippelW. (2007). Intergroup threat increases implicit stereotyping. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 7(2), 189–200.
43.
HeavenP. C.RajabD. (1983). Correlates of self-esteem among a South African minority group. Journal of Social Psychology, 121(2), 269–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1983.9924497
44.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1990). Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In AbramsD.HoggM. A. (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 28–47). Wiley.
45.
HoggM. A.SunderlandJ. (1991). Self-esteem and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00922.x
46.
HunterJ. A.CoxS. L.O’BrienK.StringerM.BoykesM. (2005). Threats to group value, domain-specific self-esteem and intergroup discrimination amongst minimal and national groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(Pt 3), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604x17939
47.
JacksonJ. W. (2002). The relationship between group identity and intergroup prejudice is moderated by sociostructural variation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 908–933. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00248.x
48.
JohnsonB. T.EaglyA. H. (2000). Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 496–528). Cambridge University Press.
49.
JordanC. H.LogelC.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P. (2012). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit attitudes, prejudices, and self-esteem: A model of simultaneous accessibility. In GawronskiB.StrackF. (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. 202–222). The Guilford Press.
50.
JordanC. H.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P. (2005). Types of high self-esteem and prejudice: How implicit self-esteem relates to ethnic discrimination among high explicit self-esteem individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271580
51.
KarpinskiA.SteinmanR. B. (2006). The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16
52.
KatzD. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163–204. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2746402
53.
KellyM.DuckittJ. (1995). Racial preference and self-esteem in Black South African children. South African Journal of Psychology, 25(4), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124639502500403
KooleS. L.SmeetsK.van KnippenbergA.DijksterhuisA. (1999). The cessation of rumination through self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.111
56.
KundaZ.SpencerS. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522
57.
KurdiB.BanajiM. (2021). Implicit social cognition: A brief (and gentle) introduction. In ReberA. S.AllenR. (Eds.), The cognitive unconscious: The first half-century (pp. 323-C17.P137). Oxford University Press.
58.
LearyM. R.TerryM. L.AllenA. B. (2009). The concept of ego threat in social and personality psychology: Is ego threat a viable scientific construct?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309342595
59.
LewinK. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. McGraw-Hill.
60.
LittleB. L.MurryW. D.WimbushJ. C. (1998). Perceptions of workplace affirmative action plans: A psychological perspective. Group & Organization Management, 23(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601198231003
61.
LocksleyA.OrtizV.HepburnC. (1980). Social categorization and discriminatory behavior: Extinguishing the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 773–783. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.773
62.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183006
63.
MacraeC. N.MilneA. B.BodenhausenG. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 37–47. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.37
McQueenA.KleinW. (2006). Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review. Self and Identity, 5(4), 289–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860600805325
66.
MillerN. E.BugelskiR. (1948). Minor studies of aggression: II. The influence of frustrations imposed by the in-group on attitude expressed toward out-groups. Journal of Psychology, 25(2), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1948.9917387
67.
NowakR. F.LindsayD. R. (1992). Discrimination of Merino ewes by their newborn lambs: Important for survival?Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 34(1–2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80057-7
QuintonW. J.CowanG.WatsonB. D. (1996). Personality and attitudinal predictors of support of Proposition 187—California’s anti-illegal immigrant initiative. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(24), 2204–2223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01796.x
70.
RichesonJ. A.AmbadyN. (2003). Effects of situational power on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00521-8
71.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
72.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
73.
RubinM.HewstoneM. (1998). Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3
74.
RudmanL. A.GoodwinS. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494
75.
RudmanL. A.GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1164–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279009
76.
RuttenbergJ.ZeaM. C.SigelmanC. K. (1996). Collective identity and intergroup prejudice among Jewish and Arab students in the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9713995
77.
ScheepersD.EllemersN. (2019). Social identity theory. In SassenbergK.VliekM. (Eds.), Social psychology in action (pp. 129–143). Springer.
78.
ScheepersD.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R.DoosjeB. (2009). The influence of discrimination and fairness on collective self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(4), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208329855
79.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Generalized causal inference: Methods for multiple studies. In ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (Eds.), Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (pp. 417–455). Houghton Mifflin.
80.
SherifM. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Houghton Mifflin.
81.
SherifM.SherifC. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension: An integration of studies of intergroup relations. Harper & Brothers Publishers.
82.
ShermanD. K.HartsonK. A. (2011). Reconciling self-protection with self-enhancement. Self-affirmation theory. In AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 128–151). The Guilford Press.
83.
SibleyC. (2009). The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Survey 2009: Sampling procedure and technical details [Unpublished technical report]. The University of Auckland.
84.
SongF.EasterwoodA.GilbodyS.DuleyL.SuttonA. J. (2000). Publication and other selection biases in systematic reviews. Health Technology Assessment, 4(10), 1–115. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta410
SteeleC. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In BerkowitzL. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 261–302). Academic Press.
87.
SteeleC. M.LiuT. J. (1981). Making the dissonance act unreflective of self: Dissonance avoidance and the expectancy of a value-affirming response. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(3), 393–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728173004
88.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.LynchM. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.885
89.
SterneJ. A. C.EggerM. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 99–110). John Wiley.
90.
SuedfeldP.PatersonH.SorianoE.ZuvicS. (2002). Lethal stereotypes: Hair and eye color as survival characteristics during the Holocaust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(11), 2368–2376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01867.x
91.
SumnerW. G. (1906). Folkways: A study of the social importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Ginn.
92.
SwannW. B.BossonJ. K. (2010). Self and identity. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 589–628). John Wiley & Sons.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
97.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. (pp. 7–24) Nelson-Hall.
98.
TesserA. (2000). On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(4), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_1
TurnerJ. C.ReynoldsK. J.HaslamS. A.VeenstraK. E. (2006). Reconceptualizing personality: Producing individuality by defining the personal self. InPostmesT.JettenJ. (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 11–36). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211946.n2
101.
UtseyS. O.McCarthyE.EubanksR.AdrianG. (2002). White racism and suboptimal psychological functioning among White Americans: Implications for counseling and prejudice prevention. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 30(2), 81–95. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2002.tb00481.x
van LaarC.DerksB.EllemersN.BleekerD. (2010). Valuing social identity: Consequences for motivation and performance in low-status groups. Journal of Social Issues, 66(3), 602–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01665.x
104.
VerkuytenM. (1996). Personal self-esteem and prejudice among ethnic majority and minority youth. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0016
105.
VerkuytenM.MassonK. (1995). “New racism,” self-esteem, and ethnic relations among minority and majority youth in the Netherlands. Social Behavior and Personality, 23(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1995.23.2.137
106.
WillsT. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245–271. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
