Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

After nearly a century's study, what do psychologists now know about intergroup bias and conflict? Most people reveal unconscious, subtle biases, which are relatively automatic, cool, indirect, ambiguous, and ambivalent. Subtle biases underlie ordinary discrimination: comfort with one's own in–group, plus exclusion and avoidance of out–groups. Such biases result from internal conflict between cultural ideals and cultural biases. A small minority of people, extremists, do harbor blatant biases that are more conscious, hot, direct, and unambiguous. Blatant biases underlie aggression, including hate crimes. Such biases result from perceived intergroup conflict over economics and values, in a world perceived to be hierarchical and dangerous. Reduction of both subtle and blatant bias results from education, economic opportunity, and constructive intergroup contact.

Keywords

bias stereotyping prejudice discrimination intergroup conflict

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Brewer

M.B.

Brown

R.J.

(1998). Intergroup relations. In Gilbert

D.T.

Fiske

S.T.

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 554–594). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Devine

P.G.

(2001). Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: How automatic are they? Introduction to the special section. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 757–759.

Dovidio

J.F.

Gaertner

S.L.

(Eds.). (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Fiske

S.T.

(1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In Gilbert

D.T.

Fiske

S.T.

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fiske

S.T.

(2000). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: Evolution, culture, mind and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 299–322.

Fiske

S.T.

Cuddy

A.J.

Glick

(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

Macrae

C.N.

Bodenhausen

G.V.

(2000). Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120.

10.

Pettigrew

T.F.

(1998a). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

11.

Pettigrew

T.F.

(1998b). Reactions toward the new minorities of western Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 77–103.

12.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Wheeler

M.E.

Fiske

S.T.

(2001, November). fMRI study of three cognitive tasks that differentially modulate stereotype accessibility and human amygdala response to racial outgroup faces. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA.

What We Know Now About Bias and Intergroup Conflict,the Problem of the Century

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References