Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-6
“I’ll be the first one on the street to protest against the lockdown”: Economic grievances and antilockdown protests during the COVID-19 pandemic in high-income countries
In the current research, we examined the association between perceived economic grievances and both intentions to engage and actual engagement in antilockdown protests during the COVID-19 pandemic in high-income countries. We also investigated whether this direct association would be (a) mediated by social identification with the economically disadvantaged and (b) moderated by fatalistic beliefs about the pandemic. In Study 1, multilevel modelling based on online search data from the US (N = 505) indicated that weekly fluctuations in searches related to economic grievances predicted the occurrence of antilockdown protests over time. In Studies 2 (Germany; N = 404) and 3 (Italy; N = 1,857), we showed that the link between perceived economic grievances and intentions to engage in antilockdown collective action was significantly mediated by social identification with people who suffered economically from the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 3 replicated the findings of Study 2 and extended it by showing the role of high (vs. low) fatalistic beliefs about the pandemic in moderating the association between perceived economic grievances and antilockdown collective action intentions. We discuss the consequences of unaddressed economic grievances for democratic functioning.
Adam-TroianJ.BonettoE.ArciszewskiT. (2021). “We shall overcome”: First-person plural pronouns from search volume data predict protest mobilization across the United States. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(8), 1476–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620987672
2.
Adam-TroianJ.ChayinskaM.PaladinoM. P.UluğÖ. M.VaesJ.Wagner-EggerP. (2022). Of precarity and conspiracy: Introducing a socio-functional model of conspiracy beliefs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(s1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12597
3.
AgostiniM.van ZomerenM. (2021). Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints. Psychological Bulletin, 147(8), 667–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000256
4.
AkessonJ.Ashworth-HayesS.HahnR.MetcalfeR.RasoolyI. (2022). Fatalism, beliefs, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 64, 147–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-022-09375-y
5.
AnsaniA.DanieleV. (2012). About a revolution: The economic motivations of the Arab Spring. International Journal of Development and Conflict, 3(3), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010269012500135
6.
AyanianA. H.TauschN.AcarY. G.ChayinskaM.CheungW.-Y.LukyanovaY. (2021). Resistance in repressive contexts: A comprehensive test of psychological predictors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 912–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000285
7.
BachemR.TsurN.LevinY.Abu-RaiyaH.MaerckerA. (2020). Negative affect, fatalism, and perceived institutional betrayal in times of the coronavirus pandemic: A cross-cultural investigation of control beliefs. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 26(11), Article 589914. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.589914
8.
BarbieriP. N.BoniniB. (2021). Political orientation and adherence to social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Economia Politica, 38, 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00224-w
9.
BernburgJ. G. (2015). Economic crisis and popular protest in Iceland, January 2009: The role of perceived economic loss and political attitudes in protest participation and support. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-20-2-231
10.
BlackburnA. M.VestergrenS., & the COVIDiSTRESS II Consortium. (2022). COVIDiSTRESS diverse dataset on psychological and behavioural outcomes one year into the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Data, 9, Article 331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01383-6
11.
BlusteinD. L.GuarinoP. A. (2020). Work and unemployment in the time of COVID-19: The existential experience of loss and fear. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 60(5), 702–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820934229
12.
BrodeurA.ClarkA. E.FlecheS.PowdthaveeN. (2021). COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends. Journal of Public Economics, 193, Article 104346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104346
13.
ChayinskaM.MinescuA.McGartyC. (2019). “We fight for a better future for our country”: Understanding the Ukrainian Euromaidan movement as the emergence of a social competition strategy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12283
14.
ChayinskaM.MirandaD.GonzálezR. (2021). A longitudinal study of the bidirectional causal relationships between online political participation and offline collective action. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, Article 106810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106810
15.
ChayinskaM.UluğÖ. M.AyanianA. H.GratzelJ. C.BrikT.KendeA.McGartyC. (2022). Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs and distrust of science predict risky public health behaviours through optimistically biased risk perceptions in Ukraine, Turkey, and Germany. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(6), 1616–1634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220978278
16.
ChenH.SuenW. (2017). Aspiring for change: A theory of middle-class activism. The Economic Journal, 127(603), 1318–1347. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12346
17.
ChomaB. L.HodsonG.SummantryD.HanochY.GummerumM. (2021). Ideological and psychological predictors of COVID-19-related collective action, opinions, and health compliance across three nations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5585
18.
ClaassenL.HennemanL.De VetR.KnolD.MarteauT.TimmermansD. (2010). Fatalistic responses to different types of genetic risk information: Exploring the role of self-malleability. Psychology & Health, 25(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440802460434
19.
CruwysT.StevensM.GreenawayK. H. (2020). A social identity perspective on COVID-19: Health risk is affected by shared group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 584–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12391
20.
DeasonG.DunnK. (2022). Authoritarianism and perceived threat from the novel coronavirus. International Journal of Psychology, 57(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12836
21.
DonosoS.PugaI.MoyaC.GerberM. M. (2022). Is it worth the risk? Grievances and street protest participation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 14(3), 338–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X221127712
22.
DruryJ. (2018). The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: An integrative review. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 38–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1471948
23.
DruryJ.CarterH.CockingC.NtontisE.Tekin GuvenS.AmlôtR. (2019). Facilitating collective resilience in the public in emergencies: Twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00141
24.
EadehF. R.ChangK. K. (2020). Can threat increase support for liberalism? New insights into the relationship between threat and political attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618815919
25.
FattoriF.PozziM.MarzanaD.MannariniT. (2015). A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behavior and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2154
26.
FetzerT.HenselL.HermleJ.RothC. (2021). Coronavirus perceptions and economic anxiety. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(5), 968–978. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00946
GoldstoneJ. A.BatesR. H.EpsteinD. L.GurrT. R.MarshallM. G.UlfelderJ.WoodwardM. (2010). A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00426.x
29.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
30.
HechlerS.ChayinskaM.WekenborgS.MoragaF.KesslerT.McGartyC. (2023). Why Chile “woke up”? Antecedents of the formation of pro-change group consciousness promoting collective action. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12906
31.
IacoellaF.JustinoP.MartoranoB. (2021). Do pandemics lead to rebellion? Policy responses to COVID-19, inequality, and protests in the USA (WIDER Working Paper 2021/57). UNU-WIDER. https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER
32.
JettenJ.MolsF.SelvanathanH. P. (2020). How economic inequality fuels the rise and persistence of the Yellow Vest movement. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.356
33.
JettenJ.MolsF.SteffensN. K. (2021). Prosperous but fearful of falling: The wealth paradox, collective angst, and opposition to immigration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220944112
34.
JimenezT.RestarA.HelmP. J.CrossR. I.BarathD.ArndtJ. (2020). Fatalism in the context of COVID-19: Perceiving coronavirus as a death sentence predicts reluctance to perform recommended preventive behaviors. SSM – Population Health, 11, Article 100615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100615
35.
KernA.MarienS.HoogheM. (2015). Economic crisis and levels of political participation in Europe (2002–2010): The role of resources and grievances. West European Politics, 38(3), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.993152
36.
KlugerN.ScrivenerJ. N. (2020). The use of Google Trends for acral symptoms during COVID-19 outbreak in France. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 34(8), e358–e360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16572
KurerT.HäusermannS.WüestB.EnggistM. (2019). Economic grievances and political protest. European Journal of Political Research, 58(3), 866–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12311
39.
MavraganiA.GkillasK. (2020). COVID-19 predictability in the United States using Google Trends time series. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77275-9
40.
McIlroyR. C.KokwaroG. O.WuJ.JikyongU.HoaiN. V.HoqueM. S.PrestonJ. M.PlantK. L.StantonN. A. (2020). How do fatalistic beliefs affect the attitudes and pedestrian behaviours of road users in different countries? A cross-cultural study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 139, Article 105491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105491
41.
McLamoreQ.SyropoulosS.LeidnerB.HirschbergerG.YoungK.ZeinR. A.BaumertA.BilewiczM.BilgenA.van BezouwM. J.ChatardA.ChekrounP.ChinchillaJ.ChoiH.-S.EuhH.GomezA.KardosP.KhooY. H.LiM.. . . BurrowsB. (2022). Trust in scientific information mediates associations between conservatism and coronavirus responses in the US, but few other nations. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 3724. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07508-6
42.
NeymanG.DalseyW. (2021). Black Lives Matter protests and COVID-19 cases: Relationship in two databases. Journal of Public Health, 43(2), 225–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab053
43.
NordfjaernT.MehdizadehM.Fallah ZavarehM. (2021). Social psychology of coronavirus disease 2019: Do fatalism and comparative optimism affect attitudes and adherence to sanitary protocols?Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 623005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623005
PapageorgeN. W.ZahnM. V.BelotM.van den Broek-AltenburgE.ChoiS.JamisonJ. C.TripodiE. (2021). Socio-demographic factors associated with self-protecting behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Population Economics, 34, 691–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00818-x
PlümperT.NeumayerE.PfaffK. G. (2021). The strategy of protest against Covid-19 containment policies in Germany. Social Science Quarterly, 102(5), 2236–2250. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13066
48.
PoselD.OyenubiA.KollamparambilU. (2021). Job loss and mental health during the COVID-19 lockdown: Evidence from South Africa. PLoS One, 16(3), Article e0249352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249352
49.
PozziM.PassiniS.ChayinskaM.MorselliD.EllenaA. M.WłodarczykA.PistoniC. (2022). “Coming together to awaken our democracy”: Examining precursors of emergent social identity and collective action among activists and non-activists in the 2019–2020 “Chile Despertó” protests. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 830–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2598
50.
PrichardE. C.ChristmanS. D. (2020). Authoritarianism, conspiracy beliefs, gender, and COVID-19: Links between individual differences and concern about COVID-19, mask-wearing behaviors, and the tendency to blame China for the virus. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 597671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.597671
51.
RüdigW.KaryotisG. (2014). Who protests in Greece? Mass opposition to austerity. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000112
52.
ScheepersD.SpearsR.DoosjeB.MansteadA. S. R. (2006). Diversity in in-group bias: Structural factors, situational features, and social functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 944–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.944
53.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
54.
SchradieJ. (2020). Give me liberty or give me Covid-19: Anti-lockdown protesters were never Trump puppets. Communication and the Public, 5(3–4), 126–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320969433
55.
ShahnaziH.Ahmadi-LivaniM.PahlavanzadehB.RajabiA.HamrahM. S.CharkaziA. (2020). Assessing preventive health behaviors from COVID-19: A cross-sectional study with health belief model in Golestan Province, northern of Iran. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 9(6), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00776-2
56.
StroebeK.PostmesT.RoosC. A. (2019). Where did inaction go? Towards a broader and more refined perspective on collective actions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(8), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12295
57.
TaylorS.AsmundsonG. J. G. (2021). Negative attitudes about facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic: The dual importance of perceived ineffectiveness and psychological reactance. PLoS One, 16(2), Article e0246317. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246317
58.
TempletonA.GuvenS. T.HoerstC.VestergrenS.DavidsonL.BallentyneS.MadsenH.ChoudhuryS. (2020). Inequalities and identity processes in crises: Recommendations for facilitating safe response to the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 674–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12400
59.
ThomasE. F.DuncanL.McGartyC.LouisW. R.SmithL. G. E. (2022). MOBILIZE: A higher order integration of collective action research to address global challenges. Advances in Political Psychology, 43(1), 107–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12811
60.
ThomasE. F.MavorK. I.McGartyC. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619
61.
UluğÖ. M.ChayinskaM.TroppL. R. (2022). Conceptual, methodological, and contextual challenges in studying collective action: Recommendations for future research. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 29(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM29.1.2
62.
UluğÖ. M.SolakN.KanıkB. (2021). Shared humanity, awareness of socio-economic privilege, and classism during the pandemic as predictors of supporting equal socio-economic policies. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 41(10), 7416–7428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01734-3
63.
van der ZwetK.BarrosA. I.van EngersT. M.SlootP. M. A. (2022). Emergence of protests during the COVID-19 pandemic: Quantitative models to explore the contributions of societal conditions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01082-y
64.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
65.
van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
66.
VestergrenS. K.UysalM. S.TekinS. (2022). Do disasters trigger protests? A conceptual view and review of the connection between disasters, injustice, and protests—the case of COVID-19. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, Article 836420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.836420
67.
VietenU. M. (2020). The “new normal” and “pandemic populism”: The COVID-19 crisis and anti-hygienic mobilization of the far-right. Social Sciences, 9(9), Article 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9090165
68.
Wagner-EggerP.Adam-TroianJ.CordonierL.CafieroF.BronnerG. (2022). The Yellow Vests in France: Psychosocial determinants and consequences of the adherence to a social movement in a representative sample of the population. International Review of Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.556
69.
WellsG. L.WindschitlP. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9), 1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512005
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
73.
ZittingK.-M.Lammers-van der HolstH. M.YuanR. K.WangW.QuanS. F.DuffyJ. F. (2021). Google Trends reveals increases in internet searches for insomnia during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) global pandemic. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 17(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8810
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
