Narrative media interventions in the form of edutainment are increasingly used to change behaviors, social norms, and attitudes. The present study examines the effects of a narrative intervention using role models on efficacy beliefs, behavioral options, social norms, and attitudes. I utilize data from a cluster randomized controlled trial with two arms (treatment vs. control) conducted in 132 villages in Burkina Faso (N = 2,904 participants). Randomly selected participants in intervention villages participated in group listening sessions of a radio drama over 3 months. Compared to a business-as-usual control, the narrative intervention increased self- and collective efficacy beliefs to bring about social change, and influenced endorsement of behavioral options to fight corruption. The intervention also reduced the perception that reporting corruption is viewed as dangerous by the community. The findings contribute to the literature on narrative media interventions and social modeling of action.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
3.
BanduraA. (2004). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. In SinghalA.CodyM. J.RogersE. M.SabidoM. (Eds.), Entertainment–education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 75–96). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
BilaliR. (2022). Fighting violent extremism with narrative intervention: Evidence from a field experiment in West Africa. Psychological Science, 33(2), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211031895
5.
BilaliR.VollhardtJ. R. (2013). Priming effects of a reconciliation radio drama on historical perspective-taking in the aftermath of mass violence in Rwanda. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.011
6.
BilaliR.VollhardtJ. R.RarickJ. D. R. (2017). Modeling collective action through media to promote social change and positive intergroup relations in violent conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.005
7.
BlairG.LittmanR.PaluckE. L. (2019). Motivating the adoption of new community-minded behaviors: An empirical test in Nigeria. Science Advances, 5, Article 5175. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau5175
FinkelS. E.McCauleyJ. F.NeureiterM.BelascoC. A. (2021). Community violence and support for violent extremism: Evidence from the Sahel. Political Psychology, 42(1), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12692
10.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
11.
GomilaR.ClarkC. S. (2022). Missing data in experiments: Challenges and solutions. Psychological Methods, 27(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000361
12.
GreenD.WilkeA.CooperJ. (2020). Countering violence against women by encouraging disclosure: A mass media experiment in rural Uganda. Comparative Political Studies, 53(14), 2283–2320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912275
13.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
14.
GreitemeyerT. (2011). Effects of prosocial media on social behavior: When and why does media exposure affect helping and aggression?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411415229
La FerraraE. (2016). Mass media and social change: Can we use television to fight poverty?Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(4), 791–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12181
MurrarS.BrauerM. (2019). Overcoming resistance to change: Using narratives to create more positive intergroup attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214188185
20.
PaluckE. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011989
21.
PaluckE. L.BallL. (2010). Social norms marketing aimed at gender-based violence: A literature review and critical assessment. International Rescue Committee.
22.
PapaM. J.SinghalA.LawS.PantS.SoodS.RogersE. M.Shefner-RogersC. L. (2000). Entertainment–education and social change: An analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and communication. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02862.x
23.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer.
24.
PrenticeD.PaluckE. L. (2020). Engineering social change using social norms: Lessons from the study of collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.012
25.
RokeachM. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. Jossey-Bass.
26.
ShelusV.VanEnkL.GiuffridaM.JansenS.ConnollyS.MukabatsindaM.JahF.NdahindwaV.ShattuckD. (2018). Understanding your body matters: Effects of an entertainment–education serial radio drama on fertility awareness in Rwanda. Journal of Health Communication, 23(8), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1527873
27.
SinghalA.CodyM. J.RogersE.SabidoM. (Eds.). (2004). Entertainment–education and social change: History, education, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
SinghalA.RogersE. (1999). Entertainment–education: A communication strategy for social change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
SlaterM. D.RounerD. (2002). Entertainment–education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/12.2.173
30.
SoodS.MenardT.WitteK. (2004). The theory behind entertainment–education. In SinghalA.CodyM. J.RogersE. M.SabidoM. (Eds.), Entertainment–education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 117–145). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
van ZomerenM.SaguyT.SchellhaasM. H. (2012). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212467476
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
