Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although most antiracism protests of 2020 were peaceful, at times, there was extreme use of force. Drawing on research that groups amplify intergroup threats, we test whether use of force is perceived as particularly justified against groups of Black people protesting racism. In Study 1, White Americans perceived a group of Black people peacefully protesting racism to be more threatening and more deserving of use of force than the same Black people protesting individually. Notably, when the protest topic did not threaten the racial hierarchy (i.e., environmental protection), Black groups (vs. individuals) no longer amplified perceived threat nor support for force. Studies 2 and 3 demonstrated that this tendency for groups to amplify intergroup threat was stronger among White Americans motivated to maintain the status quo (i.e., social conservatives). We conclude that Black groups protesting racism activate intergroup threats with implications for support for using force against them.

Keywords

collective action group stereotyping political ideology racism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.

Armed Conflict & Event Data Project. (2020). U.S. Crisis Monitor. https://acleddata.com/special-projects/us-crisis-monitor/

Bartels

L. M.

(2020). Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 117(37), 22752–22759. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007747117

Champely

(2020). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis (R package Version 1.3–0) [Computer software]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr

Cooley

Brown-Iannuzzi

Brown

C. S.

Polikoff

(2018). Black groups accentuate hypodescent by activating threats to the racial hierarchy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617708014

Cooley

Hester

Cipolli

Rivera

L. I.

Abrams

Pagan

Sommers

S. R.

Payne

(2020). Racial biases in officers’ decisions to frisk are amplified for Black people stopped among groups leading to similar biases in searches, arrests, and use of force. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(6), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619876638

Cooley

Payne

B. K.

(2017). Using groups to measure intergroup prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216675331

Cooley

Payne

B. K.

(2018). A group is more than the average of its parts: Why existing stereotypes are applied more to the same individuals when viewed in groups than when viewed alone. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 673–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218756494

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2014). On the precipice of a “majority-minority” America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614527113

10.

Craig

M. A.

Rucker

J. M.

Richeson

J. A.

(2018). Racial and political dynamics of an approaching “majority-minority” United States. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 677(1), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218766269

11.

Crandall

C. S.

Eshleman

(2003). A justification–suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 414–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414

12.

Dang

Liu

(2020). How to be “groupy” matters: Groups with shared traits and shared goals engender distinct patterns of social judgments. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 25(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220942294

13.

Devine

P. G.

Elliot

A. J.

(1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952111002

14.

Dovidio

J. F.

Gaertner

S. L

. (2004). Aversive racism. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–52). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36001-6

15.

Dunn

Shames

(2019). Stop-and-frisk in the de Blasio era. New York Civil Liberties Union. https://www.nyclu.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/20190314_nyclu_stopfrisk_singles.pdf

16.

Dupree

C. H.

Fiske

S. T.

(2019). Self-presentation in interracial settings: The competence downshift by White liberals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(3), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000166

17.

Eberhardt

J. L.

Davies

P. G.

Purdie-Vaughns

V. J.

Johnson

S. L.

(2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x

18.

Edwards

Lee

Esposito

(2019). Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 116(34), 16793–16798. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821204116

19.

Ekins

(2016). Policing in America: Understanding public attitudes toward the police. Results from a national survey. Cato Institute. https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/policing-america-understanding-public-attitudes-toward-police-results-national

20.

Giner-Sorolla

(2018, January 24). Powering your interaction. Approaching Significance. https://approachingblog.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/powering-your-interaction-2/

21.

Goff

P. A.

Eberhardt

J. L.

Williams

M. J.

Jackson

M. C.

(2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292

22.

Gray

H. M.

Gray

Wegner

D. M.

(2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619–619.

23.

Hamilton

D. L.

Chen

J. M.

D. M.

Winczewski

Banerji

Thurston

J. A.

(2015). Sowing the seeds of stereotypes: Spontaneous inferences about groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000034

24.

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.

25.

Hinton

Cook

(2021). The mass criminalization of Black Americans: A historical overview. Annual Review of Criminology, 4(1), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-060520-033306

26.

Horowitz

M. J.

Parker

Brown

Cox

(2020). Amid national reckoning, Americans divided on whether increased focus on race will lead to major policy change. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2020/10/06/amid-national-reckoning-americans-divided-on-whether-increased-focus-on-race-will-lead-to-major-policy-change/

27.

Hoyle

R. H.

Pinkley

R. L.

Insko

C. A.

(1989). Perceptions of social behavior: Evidence of differing expectations for interpersonal and intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289153007

28.

Jost

J. T.

(2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61. 7.651

29.

Jost

J. T.

(2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407

30.

Jost

J. T.

Banaji

M. R.

Nosek

B. A.

(2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x

31.

Jost

J. T.

Stern

Rule

N. O.

Sterling

(2017). The politics of fear: Is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? Social Cognition, 35(4), 324–353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.324

32.

Katz

Braly

(1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28(3), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074049

33.

Kendi

I. X.

(2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. Hachette UK.

34.

Koerth

(2021, January 7). The police’s tepid response to the Capitol breach wasn’t an aberration. FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-polices-tepid-response-to-the-capitol-breach-wasnt-an-aberration/

35.

Krishna

(2016). A clearer spotlight on spotlight: Understanding, conducting and reporting. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.04.001

36.

Ledgerwood

Eastwick

P. W.

Gawronski

(2020). Experiences of liking versus ideas about liking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, e136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19003145

37.

Maddox

K. B.

Perry

J. M.

(2018). Racial appearance bias: Improving evidence-based policies to address racial disparities. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732217747086

38.

Matthews

Levin

Sidanius

(2009). A longitudinal test of the model of political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Political Psychology, 30(6), 921–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00733.x

39.

Napier

J. L.

Jost

J. T.

(2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals?

Psychological Science, 19(6), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280. 2008.02124.x

40.

Payne

B. K.

(2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(24), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181

41.

Payne

B. K.

Correll

(2020). Race, weapons, and the perception of threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.001

42.

Payne

B. K.

Vuletich

H. A.

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

(2019). Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 116(24), 11693–11698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818816116

43.

Petsko

C. D.

Lei

R. F.

Kunst

J. R.

Bruneau

Kteily

(2020). Blatant dehumanization in the mind’s eye: Prevalent even among those who explicitly reject it? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(6), 1115–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000961

44.

Plant

E. A.

Devine

P. G.

(1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811

45.

Putnam

Chenoweth

Pressman

(2020, June 6). The Floyd protests are the broadest in U.S. history—and are spreading to White, small-town America. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/06/06/floyd-protests-are-broadest-us-history-are-spreading-white-small-town-america/

46.

Sidanius

Pratto

(2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.

47.

Tatum

B. D.

(2000). Defining racism: “Can we talk?” In Adams

Blumenfeld

W. J.

Castaneda

Hackman

H. W.

Peters,

M. L.

Zuniga

(Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (pp. 79–82). Routledge.

48.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963

49.

Wilkins

C. L.

Wellman

J. D.

Babbitt

L. G.

Toosi

N. R.

Schad

K. D.

(2015). You can win but I can’t lose: Bias against high-status groups increases their zero-sum beliefs about discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.008

50.

Wilson

J. P.

Hugenberg

Rule

N. O.

(2017). Racial bias in judgments of physical size and formidability: From size to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000092

51.

Young

D. M.

Sanchez

D. T.

Pauker

Gaither

S. E.

(2020). A meta-analytic review of hypodescent patterns in categorizing multiracial and racially ambiguous targets. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 47(5): 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220941321

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Groups amplify the perceived threat and justification for using force against Black people protesting for racial equality—especially among social conservatives

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material