The current research investigates the effect of a type of intergroup contact that has rarely been studied to date, class-based contact, on one’s personal contribution to inequality. We conducted two studies with middle and upper class individuals. We first longitudinally examined whether positive contact with working-class people reduces contribution to inequality (i.e., participants stating that they themselves contribute to maintaining the social hierarchy) whilst controlling for ideological factors. Lower levels of contribution to inequality were present in people with more and better contact, but the change over time was small in the absence of experimental manipulation. An experiment then showed that recall of positive (vs. negative) contact with working-class people reduced participants’ contribution to inequality and increased their willingness to participate in collective action for equality. These results suggest that facilitating spaces where members of different social classes can have positive interactions can contribute to reducing inequality.
AriesE.SeiderM. (2007). The role of social class in the formation of identity: A study of public and elite private college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 137–157. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.2.137-157
2.
Bay-ChengL. Y.FitzC. C.AlizagaN. M.ZuckerA. N. (2015). Tracking homo oeconomicus: Development of the Neoliberal Beliefs Inventory. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.1676
3.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.MaquilA.DemoulinS.LeyensJ.-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013470
4.
BjornsdottirR. T.RuleN. O. (2017). The visibility of social class from facial cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000091
5.
BrandtM. J.KuppensT.SpearsR.AndrighettoL.AutinF.BabincakP.BadeaC.BaeJ.BatruchA.BeckerJ. C.BocianK.BodrožaB.BourguignonD.BukowskiM.ButeraF.ButlerS. E.ChryssochoouX.ConwayP.. . .ZimmermanJ. L. (2020). Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 921–942. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2694
6.
Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LundbergK. B.KayA. C.PayneB. K. (2015). Subjective status shapes political preferences. Psychological Science, 26, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614553947
7.
BullockH. E. (2017). Social class and policy preferences: Implications for economic inequality and interclass relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.021
8.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J.MuthénB. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
9.
CakalH.HewstoneM.SchwärG.HeathA. (2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the “sedative” effect of intergroup contact among Black and White students in South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 606–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02075.x
DawtryR. J.SuttonR. M.SibleyC. G. (2015). Why wealthier people think people are wealthier, and why it matters: From social sampling to attitudes to redistribution. Psychological Science, 26, 1389–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615586560
12.
Di BernardoG. A.VezzaliL.StathiS.McKeown JonesS.CoccoV. M.SaguyT.DixonJ. (2019). Fostering social change among advantaged and disadvantaged group members: Integrating intergroup contact and social identity perspectives on collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219889134
13.
DixonJ.DurrheimK.TredouxC. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18, 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01993.x
14.
DixonJ.DurrheimK.TredouxC.TroppL.ClackB.EatonL. (2010). A paradox of integration? Interracial contact, prejudice reduction, and perceptions of racial discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01652.x
15.
DixonJ.LevineM.ReicherS.DurrheimK. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Relational inequality, collective action, and social change revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001550
16.
DovidioJ. F.LoveA.SchellhaasF. M. H.HewstoneM. (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Behavior, 20, 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217712052
17.
DroogendykL.LouisW. R.WrightS. C. (2016). Renewed promise for positive cross-group contact: The role of supportive contact in empowering collective action. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 48, 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000058
18.
DuncanL. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: Group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women’s rights activism. Political Psychology, 20, 611–635. https://doi.org10.1111/0162-895X.00159
19.
ErdfelderE.FaulF.BuchnerA. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
García-SánchezE.OsborneD.WillisG. B.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2020). Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12326
GeiserC. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. Guilford Press.
24.
GeiserC.EidM.NussbeckF. W.CourvoisierD. S.ColeD. A. (2010). Analyzing true change in longitudinal multitrait–multimethod studies: Application of a multimethod change model to depression and anxiety in children. Developmental Psychology, 46, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017888
25.
GómezÁ.TroppL. R.VázquezA.VociA.HewstoneM. (2018). Depersonalized extended contact and injunctive norms about cross-group friendship impact intergroup orientations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.010
26.
HässlerT.UllrichJ.BernardinoM.ShnabelN.van LaarC.ValdenegroD.SebbenS.TroppL. R.VisintinE. P.GonzálezR.DitlmannR. K.AbramsD.SelvanathanH. P.BrankovićM.WrightS.von ZimmermannJ.PasekM.AydinA. L.ŽeželjI.. . . UgarteL. M. (2020). A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z
27.
HaywardL. E.TroppL. R.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: Descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216685291
28.
HuL.-t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
29.
JackmanM. R.CraneM. (1986). “Some of my best friends are Black. . .”: Interracial friendship and Whites’ racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1086/268998
30.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
31.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
32.
JostJ. T.BeckerJ.OsborneD.BadaanV. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633
KassambaraA. (2021). rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests (R package Version 0.7.0) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
35.
KasserT. (2018). Materialism and living well. In DienerE.OishiS.TayL. (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.
36.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
KrausM. W.KeltnerD. (2013). Social class rank, essentialism, and punitive judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032895
39.
KrausM. W.ParkJ. W.TanJ. J. (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616673192
MaechlerM.RousseeuwP.StruyfA.HubertM.HornikK. (2021). cluster: “Finding groups in data”: Cluster analysis extended Rousseeuw et al. (R package Version 2.1.2) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cluster
43.
MajorB.KaiserC. R.O’BrienL. T.McCoyS. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068–1086. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068.
44.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). A broken social elevator? How to promote social mobility. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301085-en
47.
PaluckE. L.GreenS. A.GreenD. P. (2018). The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy, 3, 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.25
PansiniR.CampennìM.ShiL. (2020). Segregating socioeconomic classes leads to an unequal redistribution of wealth. Palgrave Communications, 6, Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0419-2
50.
Peláez PazC. (2014). La quiebra de la clase media española [The bankruptcy of the Spanish middle class]. In Martín PatinoJ. M.Giménez RomeroC. (Eds.), Informe España 2014. Una interpretación de su realidad social [Report Spain 2014. An interpretation of its social reality] (pp. 51–100). Fundación Encuentro.
51.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E. (1999). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC). Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
53.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. Psychology Press.
54.
RaoG. (2019). Familiarity does not breed contempt: Generosity, discrimination, and diversity in Delhi schools. American Economic Review, 109, 774–809. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180044
55.
ReimerN. K.BeckerJ. C.BenzA.ChristO.DhontK.KlockeU.NejiS.RychlowskaM.SchmidK.HewstoneM. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478
56.
RichinsM. L. (2004). The Material Values Scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1086/383436
57.
RichinsM. L.DawsonS. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/209304
Sánchez-Elvira PaniaguaÁ.Viedma RojasA.Gómez GarridoM.Santiago AlbaC. D.Ortí MataM. (2006). Actitudes y valores hacia la ciencia y la tecnología en los alumnos del curso de acceso para mayores de 25 años de la UNED [Attitudes and values towards science and technology in the students of the access course for over 25 years of the UNED]. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología. http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/bibliuned:500796/FECYT.pdf
60.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02296192
61.
SchwarzN. (2007). Retrospective and concurrent self-reports: The rationale for real-time data capture. In StoneA. A.ShiffmanS.AtienzaA. A.NebelingL. (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 11–26). Oxford University Press.
62.
SelvanathanH. P.TechakesariP.TroppL. R.BarlowF. K. (2018). Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690908
63.
SennettR. (2018). Building and dwelling: Ethics for the city. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
64.
SteyerR.EidM.SchwenkmezgerP. (1997). Modeling true intraindividual change: True change as a latent variable. Methods of Psychological Research, 2, 21–33.
65.
TammaruT.Marcin´ czakS.AunapR.van HamM.JanssenH. (2020). Relationship between income inequality and residential segregation of socioeconomic groups. Regional Studies, 54, 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1540035
66.
TauschN.SaguyT.BrysonJ. (2015). How does intergroup contact affect social change? Its impact on collective action and individual mobility intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12127
67.
ThomasV.AzmitiaM. (2014). Does class matter? The centrality and meaning of social class identity in emerging adulthood. Identity, 14, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2014.921171
VázquezA.LoisD. (2020). Prejudice against members of a ridiculed working-class group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 992–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12373
70.
VázquezA.López-RodríguezL.GómezÁ.DovidioJ. F. (2020). Ambivalent effects of positive contact between women and men on collective actions for women’s rights. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220974162
71.
WakslakC. J.JostJ. T.TylerT. R.ChenE. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01887.x
72.
WeeksM.LupferM. B. (2004). Complicating race: The relationship between prejudice, race, and social class categorizations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 972–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264751
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
