Inspiring visibility: Exploring the roles of identification and solidarity for alleviating Black women’s invisibility in politics

Abstract

We explored whether a Black female politician would alleviate feelings of invisibility among Black women even when they believed the politician deviated from the ingroup prototype by not supporting ingroup interests or by being low in ingroup solidarity. Study 1 demonstrated that relative to Black men and White men and women, Black women identified the most with Vice-President Kamala Harris and reported feeling the highest invisibility in politics immediately after Harris exited the Democratic primary election, but did not report higher support for Harris’s political platform. Study 2 further showed that a Black female politician who supported a policy that is viewed as harmful to Black Americans still helped alleviate feelings of invisibility for Black women because they strongly identified with the politician. However, a Black female politician opposing this policy was the most beneficial, demonstrating the importance of both identification and solidarity for inspiring visibility.

Keywords

gender group processes intersectionality politics visibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Hogg

(1999). Social identity and social cognition. Blackwell Publishers.

Appiah

(2002). Black and White viewers’ perception and recall of occupational characters on television. Journal of Communication, 52, 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02573.x

Appiah

Knobloch-Westerwick

Alter

(2013). Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: Effects of news valence, character race, and recipient race on selective news reading. Journal of Communication, 63, 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12032

Ashburn-Nardo

(2018). What can allies do? In Colella

King

(Eds.), The handbook of workplace discrimination (pp. 373–386). Oxford University Press.

Atkeson

L. R.

(2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 65, 1040–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00124

Avery

J. M.

(2006). The sources and consequences of political mistrust among African Americans. American Politics Research, 34, 653–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X06286366

Barbaro

(2020, November 9). Celebration and sorrow: Americans react to the election [Audio podcast]. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/09/podcasts/the-daily/divided-america-election-biden-trump.html?

Blair

I. V.

Judd

C. M.

Sadler

M. S.

Jenkins

(2002). The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: Judging by features and categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.5

Branscombe

N. R.

Schmitt

M. T.

Harvey

R. D.

(1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135

10.

Byers

(2020, August 24). Some Black women activists feeling left out of BLM movement. WUWM: Milwaukee’s NPR station. https://www.wuwm.com/post/some-black-women-activists-feeling-left-out-blm-movement#stream/0

11.

Chaney

K. E.

Sanchez

D. T.

Remedios

J. D.

(2018). We are in this together: How the presence of similarly stereotyped allies buffer against identity threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.005

12.

Chaney

K. E.

Sanchez

D. T.

Remedios

J. D.

(2020). Dual cues: Women of color anticipate both gender and racial bias in the face of a single identity cue. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220942844

13.

Cowley

(2014). Descriptive representation and political trust: A quasi-natural experiment utilising ignorance. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20, 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2014.937121

14.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026481

15.

Crenshaw

Ritchie

Anspach

Gilmer

Harris

(2015). Say Her Name: Resisting Police Brutality Against Black Women. Faculty Scholarship. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/3226

16.

Dasgupta

(2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313

17.

Dovi

(2002). Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, Black, or Latino do? American Political Science Review, 96, 729–743. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3117507

18.

Eaton

A. A.

Saunders

J. F.

Jacobson

R. K.

West

(2019). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w

19.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

20.

Gilberstadt

(2020). A month before George Floyd’s death, Black and White Americans differed sharply in confidence in the police. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/05/a-month-before-george-floyds-death-black-and-white-americans-differed-sharply-in-confidence-in-the-police/

21.

Goff

P. A.

Kahn

K. B.

(2013). How psychological science impedes intersectional thinking. Du Bois Review, 10, 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000313

22.

Goldstein

N. J.

Vezich

I. S.

Shapiro

J. R.

(2014). Perceived perspective taking: When others walk in our shoes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 941–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036395

23.

Gontcharova

(2019). What Kamala Harris’ campaign meant to women of color. Refinery29. https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2019/12/8959410/kamala-harris-campaign-women-of-color-significance

24.

Good

Rattan

Dweck

C. S.

(2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659

25.

Gramlich

(2019). From police to parole, Black and White Americans differ widely in their views of criminal justice system. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/21/from-police-to-parole-black-and-white-americans-differ-widely-in-their-views-of-criminal-justice-system/

26.

Hayes

Hibbing

M. V.

(2017). The symbolic benefits of descriptive and substantive representation. Political Behavior, 39, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9345-9

27.

Hildebrand

L. K.

Jusuf

C. C.

Monteith

M. J.

(2020). Ally confrontations as identity-safety cues for marginalized individuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2692

28.

Hinton

Cook

(2021). The mass criminalization of Black Americans: A historical overview. Annual Review of Criminology, 4, 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-060520-033306

29.

A. K.

Kteily

N. S.

Chen

J. M.

(2017). “You’re one of us”: Black Americans’ use of hypodescent and its association with egalitarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000107

30.

A. K.

Sidanius

Cuddy

A. J.

Banaji

M. R.

(2013). Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of Black-White biracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 940–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.010

31.

A. K.

Sidanius

Levin

D. T.

Banaji

M. R.

(2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021562

32.

Hogg

M. A.

(1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000031

33.

Hogg

M. A.

(2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1

34.

Hogg

M. A.

Hains

S. C.

(1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.295

35.

Hornsey

M. J.

(2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x

36.

Hudak

(2020). Marijuana’s racist history shows the need for comprehensive drug reform. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/how-we-rise/2020/06/23/marijuanas-racist-history-shows-the-need-for-comprehensive-drug-reform/

37.

Jans

Leach

C. W.

Garcia

R. L.

Postmes

(2015). The development of group influence on in-group identification: A multilevel approach. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214540757

38.

Johnson

I. R.

Pietri

E. S.

(2020). An ally you say? Endorsing White women as allies to encourage perceptions of allyship and organizational identity-safety among Black women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220975482

39.

Johnson

I. R.

Pietri

E. S.

Fullilove

Mowrer

(2019). Exploring identity-safety cues and allyship among Black women students in STEM environments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319830926

40.

Johnson

J. D.

Ashburn-Nardo

(2014). Testing the “Black code”: Does having White close friends elicit identity denial and decreased empathy from Black in-group members? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1177-1948550613499938

41.

Khalid

(2020, June 12). Pressure grows on Joe Biden to pick a Black woman as his running mate. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/06/12/875000650/pressure-grows-on-joe-biden-to-pick-a-black-woman-as-his-running-mate

42.

Khanna

(2010). “If you’re half Black, you’re just Black”: Reflected appraisals and the persistence of the one-drop rule. The Sociological Quarterly, 51, 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01162.x

43.

King

(2019, December 4). Why Black voters never flocked to Kamala Harris. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/04/kamala-harris-black-voters-2020-075651

44.

Krieg

(2016, July 21). Hillary Clinton hate for sale on the streets of Cleveland. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/21/politics/hillary-clinton-merchandise-cleveland-republican-convention/index.html

45.

Kumar

(2017). Participation of women in politics: Worldwide experience. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22, 77–88. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3399829

46.

Leonardelli

G. J.

Pickett

C. L.

Brewer

M. B.

(2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. In Zanna

Olson

(Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 63–113). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43002-6

47.

Leonhardt

(2020, June 12). Kamala Harris, front-runner (again). The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/12/briefing/kamala-harris-mark-milley-trump-rally-your-friday-briefing.html

48.

Levin

Sinclair

Veniegas

R. C.

Taylor

P. L.

(2002). Perceived discrimination in the context of multiple group memberships. Psychological Science, 13, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00498

49.

Lewis

K. L.

Stout

J. G.

Finkelstein

N. D.

Pollock

S. J.

Miyake

Cohen

G. L.

Ito

T. A.

(2017). Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317720186

50.

McGuire

Child

Fujioka

(1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.511

51.

Moser

C. E.

Branscombe

N. R.

(2021). Male allies at work: Gender-equality supportive men reduce negative underrepresentation effects among women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13, 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211033748

52.

Moss

A. J.

Litman

(2018, September 18). After the bot scare: Understanding what’s been happening with data collection on MTurk and how to stop it. CloudResearch blog. https://www.cloudresearch.com/resources/blog/after-the-bot-scare-understanding-whats-been-happening-with-data-collection-on-mturk-and-how-to-stop-it/

53.

Murphy

M. C.

Taylor

V. J.

(2012). The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat. In Inzlicht

Schmader

(Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 17–33). Oxford University Press.

54.

Neufeld

K. H. S.

Starzyk

K. B.

Gaucher

(2019). Political solidarity: A theory and a measure. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7, 726–765. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i2.1058

55.

Ohlheiser

(2013, June 3). Racial bias in marijuana arrests is worse than you thought. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/06/racial-bias-marijuana-arrests-worse-you-thought/314623/

56.

Pew Research Center. (2019). In a politically polarized era, sharp divides in both partisan coalitions. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/12/17/in-a-politically-polarized-era-sharp-divides-in-both-partisan-coalitions/

57.

Pietri

E. S.

Drawbaugh

M. L.

Lewis

A. N.

Johnson

I. R.

(2019). Who encourages Latina women to feel a sense of identity-safety in STEM environments? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103827

58.

Pietri

E. S.

Johnson

I. R.

Ozgumus

(2018). One size may not fit all: Exploring how the intersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.021

59.

Pietri

E. S.

Johnson

I. R.

Ozgumus

Young

A. I.

(2018). Maybe she is relatable: Increasing women’s awareness of gender bias encourages their identification with women scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42, 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317752643

60.

Rainey

Dancy

Mickelson

Stearns

Moller

(2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6

61.

Reflective Democracy Campaign. (2019). The electability myth: The shifting demographics of political power in America. Women Donors Network. https://wholeads.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/The-Electability-Myth-_-The-Shifting-Demographics-of-Political-Power-In-America-8-1-19.pdf

62.

Reingold

Harrell

(2010). The impact of descriptive representation on women’s political engagement: Does party matter? Political Research Quarterly, 63, 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908330346

63.

Remedios

J. D.

Reiff

J. S.

Hinzman

(2020). An identity-threat perspective on discrimination attributions by women of color. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 889–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620908175

64.

Remedios

J. D.

Snyder

S. H.

(2018). Intersectional oppression: Multiple stigmatized identities and perceptions of invisibility, discrimination, and stereotyping. Journal of Social Issues, 74, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12268

65.

Schmitt

M. T.

Branscombe

N. R.

Kobrynowicz

Owen

(2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282006

66.

Seaton

E. K.

Caldwell

C. H.

Sellers

R. M.

Jackson

J. S.

(2008). The prevalence of perceived discrimination among African American and Caribbean Black youth. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1288–1297. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012747

67.

Settles

I. H.

Buchanan

N. T.

Dotson

(2019). Scrutinized but not recognized: (In)visibility and hypervisibility experiences of faculty of color. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 113, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.003

68.

Steele

C. M.

Spencer

S. J.

Aronson

(2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0

69.

Stout

J. G.

Dasgupta

Hunsinger

McManus

M. A.

(2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385

70.

Tajfel

Turner

(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin

W. G.

Worchel

(Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

71.

The anti-Hillary pins at the RNC are even worse than you’d imagine. (2016, July 18). Time. https://time.com/4410564/republican-convention-anti-hillary-clinton-pins-sexist/

72.

Turner

J. C.

Hogg

M. A.

Oakes

P. J.

Reicher

S. D.

Wetherell

M. S.

(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.

73.

Ulbig

S. G.

(2007). Gendering municipal government: Female descriptive representation and feelings of political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 1106–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00494.x