Racially marginalized communities are socially and politically active, yet there is limited work that examines the psychological forces underlying how People of Color engage in cross-racial solidarity and collective action. We propose a model of politicized racial identity and collective action to Asian American participation in own-group collective action and African American collective action. In Study 1, we tested the model using correlational data. In Study 2, we used an experiment to explore whether politicized identities predict collective action. Results support the relation between politicized identities and collective action. Politicized Person of Color identity predicted Asian American engagement in both own-group-oriented collective action (Study 2) and African American-oriented (Study 1, Study 2) collective action. Further, politicized Asian American identity predicted Asian American engagement in own-group collective action (Study 1). These findings provide empirical evidence for the role of politicized identities in predicting collective action, including cross-racial solidarity with African Americans.
AjzenI.BrownT. C.CaravajalF. (2004). Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 30(9), 1108–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264079
BentlerP. M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 825–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024
ChangR. S. (1996). The end of innocence or politics after the fall of the essential subject. The American University Law Review, 45, 687–694.
8.
CorningA. F.MyersD. J. (2002). Individual orientation toward engagement in social action. Political Psychology, 23(4), 703–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00304
9.
EspirituY. L. (1992). Asian American panethnicity: Bridging institutions and identities. Temple University Press.
10.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.AnastasioP. A.BachmanB. A.RustM. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004
11.
HoF. (2000). Fists for revolution: The revolutionary history of I Wor Kuen/League of Revolutionary Struggle. In HoF. (Ed.), Legacy to liberation: Politics and culture of revolutionary Asian Pacific America (pp. 3–13). AK Press.
12.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
KellyC.BreinlingerS. (1995). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A study of women’s participation in collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(16), 1430–1445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02625.x
KimJ. (1981). Processes of Asian American identity development: A study of Japanese American women’s perceptions of their struggle to achieve positive identities as Americans of Asian ancestry [Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst]. ScholarWorks.
18.
KlarM.KasserT. (2009). Some benefits of being an activist: Measuring activism and its role in psychological well-being. Political Psychology, 30(5), 755–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00724.x
19.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
20.
LakensD. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer fort tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
21.
LakensD.ScheelA. M.IsagerP. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963
22.
LangnerC. A. (2005). Politicized collective identity: Defining the self in political terms [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley]. ProQuest.
23.
LeeE. (2015). The making of Asian America: A history. Simon & Schuster.
24.
LouisW. R.AmiotC. E.ThomasE. F.BlackwoodL. (2016). The “activist identity” and activism across domains: A multiple identities analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12165
25.
MarableM. (1994). Reconciling race and reality. Media Studies Journal, 8(3), 11–18.
26.
MarklandD. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 851–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.023
27.
MatrianoR.AtkinA. L.YooH. C.GabrielA. K. (2021). Asian American college students’ support for Black Lives Matter: Role of internalizing the model minority myth and critical reflection. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000250
28.
MersethJ. L. (2018). Race-ing solidarity: Asian Americans and support for Black Lives Matter. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1494015
29.
MinP. G.KimR. (2000). Formation of ethnic and racial identities: Narratives by young Asian-American professionals. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(4), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870050033702
MulaikS. (2007). There is a place for approximate fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 883–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.024
32.
NadalK. L.EscobarK. M. V.PradoG. T.DavidE. J. R.HaynesK. (2012). Racial microaggressions and the Filipino American experience: Recommendations for counseling and development. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 40, 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2012.00015.x
33.
NguyenC.QuinnR. (2018). “We share similar struggles”: How a Vietnamese immigrant youth organizing program shapes participants’ critical consciousness of interracial tension. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(5), 626–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248833
34.
PittinskyT. L.ShihM.AmbadyN. (1999). Identity adaptiveness: Affect across multiple identities. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00130
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
37.
SimonB.KlandermansB. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/1O.1037//OOO3-066X.56.4.319
SubašićE.ReynoldsK. J.TurnerJ. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308323223
40.
SwankE.FahsB. (2011). Pathways to political activism among Americans who have same-sex sexual contact. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0034-5
ThomasE. F.MavorK. I.McGartyC. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619
43.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC.MavorK. I. (2016). Group interaction as the crucible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215612217
44.
ThomasE. F.ZubielevitchE.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2020). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219879111
45.
TranJ.CurtinN. (2017). Not your model minority: Own-group activism among Asian Americans. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23(4), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000145
46.
TranN.NakamuraN.KimG. S.KheraG. S.AhnAllenJ. M. (2018). #APISFORBLACKLIVES: Unpacking the interracial discourse on the Asian American Pacific Islander and Black communities. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 4(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1285/i24212113v4i2p73
47.
UfkesE. G.CalcagnoJ.GlasfordD. E.DovidioJ. F. (2016). Understanding how common ingroup identity undermines collective action among disadvantaged-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.006
48.
UllmanJ. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03
49.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
50.
Vidal-OrtizS. (2004). On being a White person of color: Using autoethnography to understand Puerto Rican’s racialization. Qualitative Sociology, 27(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000020692.05355.6e
51.
WongJ.RamakrishnanS. K.LeeT.JunnJ. (2011). Activists and the future of Asian American political participation. In Asian American political participation: Emerging constituents and their political identities (pp. 229–241). Russell Sage Foundation.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
