We investigated U.S. citizens’ politicization (i.e., switching from not self-defining to self-defining as an active political party supporter) during the 2012 U.S. Presidential Elections. We used a novel identity content approach to explore qualitative changes in overlap between personal and politicized identity traits. We collected longitudinal data from a community sample of U.S. citizens (N = 760), tracking whether and how personal and politicized identity content developed: two months before (T1), immediately before (T2), and 2 months after (T3) the election. We explored a subsample of participants who met inclusion criteria (n = 115), comparing 87 participants who did not politicize with 28 participants who self-labeled as unpoliticized at T1, but politicized at T2/T3. Results confirmed hypotheses: Only politicizers showed greater integration between their personal and politicized identity content over time; moreover, identity content was a significant positive predictor of politicization and action engagement. We discuss the value of identity content for politicization research.
AshmoreR. D.DeauxK.McLaughlin-VolpeT. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114.
2.
BarayG.PostmesT.JettenJ. (2009). When I equals we: Exploring the relation between social and personal identity of extreme right-wing political party members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 625-647.
3.
Bay-ChengL. Y.ZuckerA. N. (2007). Feminism between the sheets: Sexual attitudes among feminists, nonfeminists, and egalitarians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 157-163.
4.
BeckerJ. C.WagnerU. (2009). Doing gender differently—The interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women’s endorsement of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 487-508.
5.
BlackwoodL. M.LouisW. R. (2012). If it matters for the group then it matters to me: Collective action outcomes for seasoned activists. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 72-92.
6.
BrunstingS.PostmesT. (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research, 33, 525-554.
7.
CadinuM. R.RothbartM. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661-667.
8.
CrossW. E.Jr. (1971). Toward a psychology of Black liberation: The Negro-to-Black conversion experience. Black World, 20(9), 13-27.
9.
DeutschM.SteilJ. M. (1988). Awakening the sense of injustice. Social Justice Research, 2, 3-23.
10.
DoosjeB.EllemersN.SpearsR. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
11.
DowningN. E.RoushK. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment a model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 695-709.
12.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35-58.
13.
DuncanL. E. (2010). Women’s relationship to feminism: Effects of generation and feminist self-labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 498-507.
14.
DuncanL. E. (2012). The psychology of collective action. In DeauxK.SnyderM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 781-803). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
EllemersN.van KnippenbergA.De VriesN.WilkeH. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497-513.
17.
GrantJ. T.MockabeeS. T.MonsonJ. Q. (2010). Campaign effects on the accessibility of party identification. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 811-821.
18.
GurinP.MillerA. H.GurinG. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 30-47.
19.
HornseyM. J.BlackwoodL.LouisW.FieldingK.MavorK.MortonT.. . . WhiteK. M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1701-1722.
20.
IyerA.JettenJ.TsivrikosD.PostmesT.HaslamS. A. (2009). The more (and the more compatible) the merrier: Multiple group memberships and identity compatibility as predictors of adjustment after life transitions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 707-733.
21.
JettenJ.PostmesT.McAuliffeB. J. (2002). “We’re all individuals”: Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207.
22.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
23.
KlandermansP. G. (1997). The social psychology of protest (1st ed.). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
24.
KlandermansP. G. (2002). How group identification helps to overcome the dilemma of collective action. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 887-900.
25.
KlandermansP. G. (2014). Identity politics and politicized identities: Identity processes and the dynamics of protest. Political Psychology, 35, 1-22.
26.
KlandermansP. G.SabucedoJ. M.RodriguezM.De WeerdM. (2002). Identity processes in collective action participation: Farmers’ identity and farmers’ protest in the Netherlands and Spain. Political Psychology, 23, 235-251.
27.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.. . . SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165.
28.
LivingstoneA. G. (2014). Why the psychology of collective action requires qualitative transformation as well as quantitative change. Contemporary Social Science, 9, 121-134.
29.
LivingstoneA. G.HaslamS. A. (2008). The importance of social identity content in a setting of chronic social conflict: Understanding intergroup relations in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 1-21.
30.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
31.
McConnellA. R. (2010). The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 3-27.
32.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
PostmesT.BarayG.HaslamA.MortonT. A.SwaabR. I. (2006). The dynamics of personal and social identity formation. In PostmesT.JettenJ. (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 215-236). London, UK: SAGE.
34.
PostmesT.HaslamS. A.JansL. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 597-617.
35.
PostmesT.JettenJ. (2006). Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. London, UK: Pine Forge Press.
36.
PostmesT.SpearsR.CihangirS. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
37.
RuncimanW. G. (1966). Relative deprivation & social justice: Study attitudes social inequality in 20th century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
SellersR. M.SmithM. A.SheltonJ. N.RowleyS. A.ChavousT. M. (1998). Multidimensional model of racial identity: A reconceptualization of African American racial identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 18-39.
39.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
SimonB.GrabowO. (2010). The politicization of migrants: Further evidence that politicized collective identity is a dual identity. Political Psychology, 31, 717-738.
41.
SimonB.KlandermansP. G. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331.
42.
SimonB.LoewyM.StürmerS.WeberU.FreytagP.HabigC.. . . SpahlingerP. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 646-658.
43.
SimonB.RuhsD. (2008). Identity and politicization among Turkish migrants in Germany: The role of dual identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1354-1366.
44.
SimonB.TrötschelR.DähneD. (2008). Identity affirmation and social movement support. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 935-946.
45.
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F.PippinG. M.BialosiewiczS. (2012). Relative deprivation a theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 203-232.
46.
StrykerS. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 30, 558-564.
47.
StürmerS.SimonB. (2004a). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 59-99.
48.
StürmerS.SimonB. (2004b). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 263-277.
49.
SwannW. B.Jr.BuhrmesterM. D.GómezA.JettenJ.BastianB.VázquezA.. . . ZhangA. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 912-926.
50.
SwannW. B.Jr.GómezA.SeyleD. C.MoralesJ.HuiciC. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 995-1011.
51.
SwannW. B.Jr.JettenJ.GómezA.WhitehouseH.BastianB. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119, 441-456.
52.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
53.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC.MavorK. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 194-218.
54.
TurnerJ. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 77-122.
55.
Turner-ZwinkelsF. M.PostmesT.van ZomerenM. (2015). Achieving harmony among different social identities within the self-concept: The consequences of having a philosophy of life. Manuscript in preparation.
56.
Turner-ZwinkelsF. M.van ZomerenM.PostmesT. (2015). The moral glue in politicization: Comparing the role of competence, warmth and moral identity content in politicization. Manuscript in preparation.
57.
van VeelenR.OttenS.HansenN. (2011). Linking self and ingroup: Self-anchoring as distinctive cognitive route to social identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 628-637.
58.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.
59.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 52-71.
60.
van ZomerenM.SaguyT.MazzoniD.CicognaniE. (2015). Voting in national elections as collective action. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
