Presence of gay men in mainstream media may have a positive impact on viewers’ attitude change. However, gay male characters are often stereotypically portrayed as feminine, and no research has yet explored audiences’ reactions to counter-stereotypical gay characters. Heterosexual Italian men (N = 158) were exposed to a clip portraying (i) a stereotypical feminine gay male character, (ii) a counter-stereotypical masculine gay male character, or (iii) a nature documentary. Compared to the other conditions, exposure to the counter-stereotypical gay character increased discrimination toward gay men, in the form of anti-gay jokes, the higher the level of participants’ prejudice against gay men. Results further demonstrated that this effect was explained by reduced perceived stereotypicality of the character. Findings are in line with the social identity theory prediction that when gay men (outgroup) are perceived as too similar, and potentially threaten the group identity, heterosexual men would attempt to restore ingroup distinctiveness.
AdamczykA.PittC. (2009). Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context. Social Science Research, 38, 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.01.002
2.
AngeloneD. J.HirschmanR.SunigaS.ArmeyM.ArmelieA. (2005). The influence of peer interactions on sexually oriented joke telling. Sex Roles, 52(3–4), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1294-4
BarthJ.ParryJ. (2009). 2 > 1 + 1? The impact of contact with gay and lesbian couples on attitudes about gays/lesbians and gay-related policies. Politics & Policy, 37, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00160.x
5.
BattlesK.Hilton-MorrowW. (2002). Gay characters in conventional spaces: Will and Grace and the situation comedy genre. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180216553
6.
BernatJ. A.CalhounK. S.AdamsH. E.ZeichnerA. (2001). Homophobia and physical aggression toward homosexual and heterosexual individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.179
7.
BestD. L.WilliamsJ. E. (1994). Masculinity/femininity in the self and ideal self descriptions of university students in fourteen countries. In BouvyA.-M.van de VijverF. J. R. (Eds.), Journeys into cross-cultural psychology (pp. 297–306). Swets & Zeitlinger.
8.
BettinsoliM. L.SuppesA.NapierG. L. (2020). Predictors of attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women in 23 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(5), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619887785
9.
BlairI. V.JuddC. M.SadlerM. S.JenkinsC. (2002). The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: Judging by features and categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.5
10.
BlashillA. J.PowlishtaK. K. (2009). Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes. Sex Roles, 61(11–12), 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9684-7
11.
BondB. J. (2020). The development and influence of parasocial relationships with television characters: A longitudinal experimental test of prejudice reduction through parasocial contact. Communication Research, 48(4), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219900632
12.
BondB. J.ComptonB. L. (2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences’ endorsement of gay equality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1093485
13.
BossonJ. K.JurekP.VandelloJ. A.Kosakowska-BerezeckaN.OlechM.BestaT.BenderMHoorensV.Becker M.Timur SevincerA.BestD. L. SafdarS.WłodarczykA.Zawisza M.Żadkowska M.AbuhamdehS.AgyemangC. B.AkbaşG.Albayrak-AydemirN.. . . ŽukauskienėR. (2021). Psychometric properties and correlates of precarious manhood beliefs in 62 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(3), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022121997997
14.
BossonJ. K.VandelloJ. A. (2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402669
15.
BossonJ. K.WeaverJ. R.CaswellT. A.BurnafordR. M. (2012). Gender threats and men’s antigay behaviors: The harmful effects of asserting heterosexuality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211432893
16.
BranfmanJ. (2019). Failed fatherhood and the “trap of ambivalence”: Assimilation, homonormativity, and effeminophobia in The New Normal. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(12), 1671–1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2018.1510263
17.
BrooksA. S.LuytR.ZawiszaM.McDermottD. T. (2020). Ambivalent homoprejudice towards gay men: Theory development and validation. Journal of Homosexuality, 67, 1261–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1585729
18.
CalzoJ. P.WardL. M. (2009). Media exposure and viewers’ attitudes toward homosexuality: Evidence for mainstreaming or resonance?Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908049
CarteiV.RebyD. (2012). Acting gay: Male actors shift the frequency components of their voices towards female values when playing homosexual characters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-011-0123-4
21.
CooperE. (2003). Decoding Will and Grace: Mass audience reception of a popular network situation comedy. Sociological Perspectives, 46, 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2003.46.4.513
22.
ClarkC. (1969). Television and social controls: Some observations on the portrayals of ethnic minorities. Television Quarterly, 8(2), 18–22.
23.
DeauxK.LewisL. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.991
24.
DunnJ. A.McLaughlinB. (2019). Counter-stereotyped protagonists and stereotyped supporting casts: Identification with black characters and symbolic racism. Communication Research Reports, 36(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2019.1660870
FasoliF.PaladinoM. P.CarnaghiA.JettenJ.BastianB.BainP. G. (2016). Not “just words”: Exposure to homophobic epithets leads to dehumanizing and physical distancing from gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2148
27.
FergusonM. A.FordT. E. (2008). Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 21(3), 283–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014
28.
FordT. E.FergusonM. A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4
GadfieldN.GilesH.BourhisR. Y.TajfelH. (1979). Dynamics of humour in ethnic group relations. Ethnicity, 6, 373–382.
31.
GaldiS.GuizzoF. (2021). Media-induced sexual harassment: the routes from sexually objectifying media to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 84, 645–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01196-0
32.
GaldiS.MaassA.CadinuM. (2014). Objectifying media their effect on gender role norms and sexual harassment of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313515185
33.
GaldiS.MaassA.CadinuM. (2017). Defending the victim of sexual harassment: The influence of civil courage and media exposure. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317709770
34.
GardnerR. C.ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (1994). Stereotypes as consensual beliefs. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 1–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
39.
GlickP.GanglC.GibbS.KlumpnerS.WeinbergE. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: More negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles, 57, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9195-3
40.
GovorunO.FuegenK.PayneB. K. (2006). Stereotypes focus defensive projection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(6), 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205285556
41.
GowenC. W.BrittT. W. (2006). The interactive effects of homosexual speech and sexual orientation on the stigmatization of men: Evidence for expectancy violation theory. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06292769
42.
GranfieldA. J.GilesH. (1975). Towards an analysis of humor through symbolism. International Journal of Symbology, 6(2), 17–23.
43.
GrayJ. A.FordT. E. (2013). The role of social context in the interpretation of sexist humor. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 26(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2013-0017
44.
GreenwoodD.IsbellL. M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men’s and women’s reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00073
45.
GrossL. (2001). Up from visibility: Lesbians, gay men, and the media in America. Columbia University Press.
46.
GuizzoF.CadinuM. (2021). Women, not objects: Testing a sensitizing web campaign against female sexual objectification to temper sexual harassment and hostile sexism. Media Psychology, 24, 509–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1756338
47.
HartK.-P. R. (2000). Representing gay men on American television. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 9(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.0901.59
48.
HaslamN.LevyS. R. (2006). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276516
49.
HaslamS. A.TurnerJ. C.OaksP. J.ReynoldsK. J.EgginsR. A.NolanM.TweedieJ. (1998). When do stereotypes become really consensual? Investigating the group-based dynamics of the concensualization process. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(5), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199809/10)28:5<755::AID-EJSP891>3.0.CO;2-Z
50.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
51.
HeavenP. C. L.OxmanL. N. (1999). Human values, conservatism and stereotypes of homosexuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00216-5
52.
HenkinB.FishJ. M. (1986). Gender and personality differences in the appreciation of cartoon humor. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 120(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1986.9712625
53.
HerekG. M. (1984). Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A factory analytic study. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v10n01_03
54.
HerekG. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551476
55.
HerekG. M. (1992). The social context of hate crimes: Notes on cultural heterosexism. In HerekG. M.BerrillK. (Eds.), Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 89–104). SAGE.
56.
HerekG. M. (2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ?Journal of Social Issues, 56, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00164
HerekG. M. (2016). The social psychology of sexual prejudice. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 355–384). Psychology Press.
HodsonG.MacInnisC. C. (2016). Derogating humor as a delegitimization strategy in intergroup contexts. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000052
61.
HortB. E.FagotB. I.LeinbachM. D. (1990). Are people’s notions of maleness more stereotypically framed than their notions of femaleness?Sex Roles, 23, 197–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289866
62.
HuntC. J.FasoliF.CarnaghiA.CadinuM. (2016). Masculine self-presentation and distancing from femininity in gay men: An experimental examination of the role of masculinity threat. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(1), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039545
63.
HuntC. J.GonsalkoraleK. (2014). Who cares what she thinks, what does he say? Links between masculinity, ingroup bonding, and gender harassment. Sex Roles, 70, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0324-x
64.
IgartuaJ. J. (2010). Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 35(4), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.019
65.
JettenJ.SpearsR. (2003). The divisive potential of differences and similarities: The role of intergroup distinctiveness in intergroup differentiation. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 203–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280340000063
66.
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1222–1233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1222
JettenJ.SpearsR.PostmesT. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 862–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.862
69.
JoyceN.HarwoodJ. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212447944
70.
JussimL.ColemanL. M.LerchL. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
71.
KimmelM. S. (1997). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In GergenM. M.DavisS. N. (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 223–242). Routledge.
72.
KiteM. E.DeauxK. (1986). Attitudes toward homosexuality: Assessment and behavioral consequences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0702_4
KiteM. E.WhitleyB. E.Jr. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296224002
75.
KiteM. E.WhitleyB. E.Jr. (1998). Do heterosexual men and women differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In HerekG. M. (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 39–61). SAGE.
76.
LalondeR. N. (2002). Testing the social identity-intergroup differentiation hypothesis: “We’re not American eh”!. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602321149902
77.
LaMarL.KiteM. E. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551932
LeeT. T.HicksG. R. (2011). An analysis of factors affecting attitudes toward same-sex marriage: Do the media matter?Journal of Homosexuality, 58, 1391–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.614906
80.
LehavotK.LambertA. J. (2007). Toward a greater understanding of antigay prejudice: On the role of sexual orientation and gender role violation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701503390
81.
LeppinkJ. (2018). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) vs. moderated regression (MODREG): Why the interaction matters. Health Professions Education, 4(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.04.001
82.
LevinaM.WaldoC. R.FitzgeraldL. F. (2000). We’re here, we’re queer, we’re on TV: The effects of visual media on heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 738–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02821.x
83.
LiM. (2019). Priming mediated vicarious intergroup contact: How narrative focus influences attitude changes toward gay people, same-sex family, and social dominance. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 39(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618810203
84.
LinnemanT. J. (2008). How do you solve a problem like Will Truman? The feminization of gay masculinities on Will & Grace. Men and Masculinities, 10, 583–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X06291918
85.
LippaR. A. (2008). Sex differences and sexual orientation differences in personality: Findings from the BBC Internet Survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9267-z
86.
LyonsA.KashimaY. (2003). How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.989
87.
MaassA.CadinuM.GuarnieriG.GrasselliA. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853
88.
MaccobyE. E. (1987). The varied meanings of “masculine” and “feminine”. In ReinischJ. M.RosenblumL. A.SandersS. A. (Eds.), Masculinity/femininity (pp. 227–239). Oxford University Press.
89.
MadonS. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37, 663–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936334
90.
MadžarevićG.Soto-SanfielM. T. (2019). Reducing homophobia in college students through film appreciation. Journal of LGBT Youth, 16, 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2018.1524321
91.
MartinC. L. (1990). Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles. Sex Roles, 22, 151–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00288188
92.
MasseyS. G. (2009). Polymorphous prejudice: Liberating the measurement of heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 46, 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802623131
93.
MasseyS. G. (2010). Valued differences of benevolent stereotypes? Exploring the influence of positive beliefs on anti-gay and anti-lesbian attitudes. Psychology & Sexuality, 1, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2010.484593
94.
MazziottaA.MummendeyA.WrightS. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390533
95.
McInroyL. B.CraigS. L. (2017). Perspectives of LGBTQ emerging adults on the depiction and impact of LGBTQ media representation. Journal of Youth Studies, 20, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1184243
96.
McLaughlinB.RodriguezN. S. (2017). Identifying with a stereotype: The divergent effects of exposure to homosexual television characters. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(9), 1196–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1242335
MillerB.LewallenJ. (2015) The effects of portrayals of gay men on homonegativity and the attribution of gender-based descriptors. Communication Studies, 66, 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1018446
99.
MitchellD.HirschmanR. D. J. A.LillyR. S. (2004). A laboratory analogue for the study of peer sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(3), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00136.x
100.
MohipC.MorryM. M. (2004). The relationship of symbolic beliefs and prior contact to heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087214
101.
MooreT. E.GriffithsK.PayneB. (1987). Gender, attitudes towards women, and the appreciation of sexist humour. Sex Roles, 16(9–10), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292486
102.
MorrisonM. A.MorrisonT. G. (2011). Sexual orientation bias toward gay men and lesbian women: Modern homonegative attitudes and their association with discriminatory behavioral intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 2573–2599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00838.x
103.
Moss-RacusinC. A.JohnsonE. R. (2016). Backlash against male elementary educators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12366
NortonA. T.HerekG. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6
106.
O’ConnorE. C.FordT. E.BanosN. C. (2017). Restoring threatened masculinity: The appeal of sexist and anti-gay humor. Sex Roles, 77, 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0761-z
107.
OlsonJ. M.RoeseN. J.ZannaM. P. (1996). Expectancies. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). The Guilford Press.
108.
OrtizM.HarwoodJ. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(4), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150701626487
109.
PageS.YeeM. (1985). Conception of male and female homosexual stereotypes among university undergraduates. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 109–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J082v12n01_06
110.
ParkS. Y. (2012). Mediated intergroup contact: Concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication and Society, 15(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.558804
111.
PatrickD. L.BellJ. F.HuangJ. Y.LazarakisN. C.EdwardsT. C. (2013). Bullying and quality of life in youths perceived as gay, lesbian, or bisexual in Washington State. American Journal of Public Health, 103(7), 1255–1261. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301101
112.
PhoenixA.FroshS.PattmanR. (2003). Producing contradictory masculine subject positions: Narratives of threat, homophobia and bullying in 11–14 year old boys. Journal of Social Issues, 59(1), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.t01-1-00011
113.
PilkingtonN. W.LydonJ. E. (1997). The relative effect of attitude similarity and attitude dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction: Investigating the moderating roles of prejudice and group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232001
RaleyA. B.LucasJ. L. (2006). Stereotype or success? Prime-time television’s portrayals of gay male, lesbian, and bisexual characters. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(2), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v51n02_02
RoccasS.SchwartzS. H. (1993). Effects of intergroup similarity on intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(6), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420230604
118.
RösslerP.BrosiusH. B. (2001). Do talk shows cultivate adolescents’ views of the world? A prolonged-exposure experiment. Journal of Communication, 51, 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02876.x
119.
RothmannJ. (2013). “Send in the (gay) clowns”: Will & Grace and Modern Family as “sensibly queer”. Acta Academica, 45, 40–83. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC151940
120.
RudmanL. A.FairchildK. (2004). Reactions to counter-stereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157
121.
RuscherJ. B. (2001). Prejudiced comunication: A social psychological perspective. Guilford.
SchiappaE.GreggP. B.HewesD. E. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v51n04_02
124.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one’s prototypicality and evaluations of fellow ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1476
SieblerF.SaskiaS.BohnerG. (2008). A refined computer harassment paradigm: Validation, and test of hypotheses about target characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00404.x
127.
SinkA.MastroD. (2017). Depictions of gender on primetime television: A quantitative content analysis. Mass Communication & Society, 20, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1212243
128.
SinkA.MastroD.DragojevicM. (2018). Competent or warm? A stereotype content model approach to understanding perceptions of masculine and effeminate gay television characters. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017706483
129.
SparkmanD. J.EidelmanS. (2016). “Putting myself in their shoes”: Ethnic perspective taking explains liberal–conservative differences in prejudice and stereotyping. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.095
130.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hal.
131.
ThomasC. A.EssesV. M. (2004). Individual differences in reactions to sexist humor. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204039975
VandelloJ. A.BossonJ. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826
134.
VandelloJ. A.BossonJ. K.CohenD.BurnafordR. M.WeaverJ. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453
135.
Van der ToornJ.JostJ. T.PackerD.NoorbalochiS.Van BavelJ. J. (2017). In defense of tradition: Religiosity, conservatism, and opposition to same-sex marriage in North America. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(10), 1455–1468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217718523
136.
Vieira de FigueiredoC.PereiraC. R. (2021). The effect of gender and male distinctiveness threat on prejudice against homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000269
137.
VincentW.ParrottD. J.PetersonJ. L. (2011). Effects of traditional gender role norms and religious fundamentalism on self-identified heterosexual men’s attitudes, anger, and aggression toward gay men and lesbians. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 12, 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023807
138.
WallsN. E. (2008). Toward a multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: The changing nature of prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 55, 20–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802129287
139.
WarrinerK.NagoshiC. T.NagoshiJ. L. (2013). Correlates of homophobia, transphobia, and internalized homophobia in gay or lesbian and heterosexual samples. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(9), 1297–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2013.806177
140.
WellmanJ. D.BeamA. J.WilkinsC. L.NewellE. E.MendezC. A. (2021). Masculinity threat increases bias and negative emotions toward feminine gay men. Psychology of Men & Masculinities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000349
141.
ZillmannD. (1983). Disparagement humor. In McGheeP. E.GoldsteinJ. H. (Eds.), Handbook of humor research: Vol. 1. Basic issues (pp. 85–107). Springer-Verlag.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
