In three studies, we examined whether ingroup disparaging humor leads to greater stereotyping of the ingroup. First, in Study 1, (N = 101) university students were exposed to (a) ingroup disparaging humor, (b) neutral humor, or (c) ingroup disparaging nonhumorous text. Participants exposed to disparaging humor reported more stereotypic evaluations than those in the neutral humor or disparaging text condition. Study 2 (N = 167) replicated these findings with humor conditions (disparaging vs. neutral) and showed that ingroup identification moderated the effects of the type of humor. Low identifiers exposed to ingroup disparaging humor (vs. those in the control condition) reported a greater frequency of stereotypic evaluations, whereas the manipulation did not affect high identifiers. Finally, Study 3 (N = 153) also manipulated the source of the jokes. As in Study 2, we found an interaction effect showing that high identifiers were not affected by the manipulation, whereas for low identifiers disparaging humor increased stereotyping and led to more negative emotions toward the ingroup. No significant effects were found for source of the jokes. We discuss findings in terms of how the traditional pattern of humor facilitating outgroup stereotyping also seems to apply to ingroup stereotyping.
AbramsJ. R.BippusA. (2011). An intergroup investigation of disparaging humor. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 193–201. doi:10.1177/0261927X10397162
2.
AlwinD. F. (1997). Feeling thermometers versus 7-point scales: Which are better?Sociological Methods and Research, 25, 318–340. doi:10.1177/0049124197025003003
3.
ArgüelloC.WillisG. B.Carretero-DiosH. (2012). The effects of social power and disparagement humor on the evaluations of subordinates. Revista de Psicología Social, 27, 323–336. doi:10.1174/021347412802845504
4.
Carretero-DiosH.PérezC.Buela-CasalG. (2010). Assessing the appreciation of the content and structure of humor: Construction of a new scale. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 23, 307–325. doi:10.1515/humr.2010.014
5.
CoullA.YzerbytV. Y.CastanoE.PaladinoM.-P.LeemansV. (2001). Protecting the ingroup: Motivated allocation of cognitive resources in the presence of threatening ingroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 327–339. doi:10.1177/1368430201004004003
6.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA. (2003). A justification–suppression of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414
7.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
8.
DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. M. (2010). The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. London, UK: SAGE.
9.
EllemersN.WilkeH.van KnippenbergA. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766–778. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.766
10.
EssesV. M.ZannaM. P. (1995). Mood and the expression of ethnic stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1052–1068. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1052
11.
FergusonM. A.FordT. E. (2008). Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 21, 283–312. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2008.014
12.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
14.
FordT. E. (1997). Effects of stereotypical television portrayals of African-Americans on person perception. Social Psychology Quarterly, 6, 266–278. doi:10.2307/2787086
15.
FordT. E. (2000). Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1094–1107. doi:10.1177/01461672002611006
16.
FordT. E.BoxerC. F.ArmstrongJ.EdelJ. R. (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 159–170. doi:10.1177/0146167207310022
17.
FordT. E.FergusonM. A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 79–94. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0801
18.
FordT. E.RichardsonK.PetitW. E. (2015). Disparagement humor and prejudice: Contemporary theory and research. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 28, 171–186. doi:10.1515/humor-2015-0017
19.
FordT. E.WentzelE. R.LorionJ. (2001). Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 677–691. doi:10.1002/ejsp.56
20.
FordT. E.WoodzickaJ. A.TriplettS. R.KochersbergerA. O.HoldenC. J. (2013). Not all groups are equal: Differential vulnerability of social groups to the prejudice-releasing effects of disparagement humor. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 178–199. doi:10.1177/1368430213502558
21.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press/Taylor &Francis.
22.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
23.
KinderD. R.DrakeK. W. (2009). Myrdal’s prediction. Political Psychology, 30, 539–568. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00714.x
24.
KochersbergerA. O.FordT. E.WoodzickaJ. A.Romero-SanchezM.Carretero-DiosH. (2014). The role of identification with women as a determinant of amusement with sexist humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27, 441–460. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0071
25.
LaFranceM.WoodzickaJ. A. (1998). No laughing matter: Women’s verbal and nonverbal reactions to sexist humor. In SwinJ. K.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice, the target’s perspective (pp. 61–80). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
MaioG. R.OlsonJ. M.BushJ. E. (1997). Telling jokes that disparage social groups: Effects on the joke teller’s stereotypes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1986–2000. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01636.x
27.
MateraC.GianniniM.BlancoA.SmithP. B. (2005). Autostereotyping and national identity in the Spanish context. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39, 83–92.
28.
McAuliffeB. J.JettenJ.HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2003). Individualist and collectivist norms: When it’s OK to go your own way. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 57–70. doi:10.1002/ejsp.129
PostmesT.SpearsR.LeaM. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341–371. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00761.x
31.
PuertasS. (2003). Activación automática de los estereotipos asociados al poder y su medición implícita (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Universidad de Granada, Spain.
32.
Romero-SánchezM.DuránM.Carretero-DiosH.MegíasJ. L.MoyaM. (2010). Exposure to sexist humor and rape proclivity: The moderator effect of aversiveness ratings. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2339–2350. doi:10.1177/0886260509354884
33.
RouhanaN. N. (1996). Perceiving the meta-message of disparaging intergroup jokes: The role of the joke teller’s group membership and attitudes. Unpublished manuscript.
34.
SpearsR.ScheepersD.JettenJ.DoosjeB.EllermersN.PostmesT. (2004). Entitativity, group distinctiveness, and social identity: Getting and using social structure. In YzerbytI.JuddC. M.CorneilleO. (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 293–316). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
35.
StangorC.SechristG. B.JostJ. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486–496. doi:10.1177/0146167201274009
36.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
37.
ThomaeM.PinaA. (2015). Sexist humor and social identity: The role of sexist humor in men’s in-group cohesion, sexual harassment, rape proclivity, and victim blame. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 28, 187–204. doi:10.1515/humor-2015-0023
38.
VikiG. T.ThomaeM.CullenA.FernandezH. (2007). The effect of sexist humor and type of rape on men’s self-reported rape proclivity and victim blame. Current Research in Social Psychology, 13, 122–132. doi:10.1037/h0099198
39.
WeinsteinN.HodginsH. S.Ostvik-WhiteE. (2011). Humor as aggression: Effects of motivation on hostility expressed in humor appreciation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1043–1055. doi:10.1037/a0022495
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
