As multiracial children of foreign-born parents, Kamala Harris and Barack Obama embody diversity in politics for many perceivers. Yet some have also questioned their loyalty to their respective groups. We explored perceptions of dual group members’ (DGM; dual nationals, multiracial people, and dual state residents) loyalty among first-party (those who share a group membership with a DGM target) and third-party perceivers (those who do not). Studies 1a–2b showed that first- and third-party perceivers rated DGMs as less loyal than their single group member (SGM) counterparts. However, only first- (Studies 2a–2b) but not third-party (Studies 1a–1b) perceivers preferred SGMs to DGMs for loyalty-dependent roles. Study 3 revealed that perceivers who were higher in patriotism supported DGMs for loyalty-dependent roles less when they were first- (vs. third) party observers. These studies suggest that perceivers readily intuit that DGMs are less loyal than SGMs and, under some conditions, this may lead to discrimination.
AbelsonR. P.DasguptaN.ParkJ.BanajiM. R. (1998). Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 243–250.
2.
AlbujaA. F.SanchezD. T.GaitherS. E. (2018). Fluid racial presentation: Perceptions of contextual “passing” among biracial people. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.010
CastanoE.YzerbytV.BourguignonD.SeronE. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1512
7.
ChenJ. M.KteilyN. S.HoA. K. (2019). Whose side are you on? Asian Americans’ mistrust of Asian-White biracials predicts more exclusion from the ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 827–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218798032
8.
ColbyS. L.OrtmanJ. M. (2015). Projections of the Size and Composition of the US Population: 2014 to 2060. Population Estimates and Projections. Current Population Reports. P25-1143. US Census Bureau.
9.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
10.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(1), 5.
FiskeS. T. (2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825
13.
FiskeS. T.XuJ.CuddyA. C.GlickP. (1999). (Dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of social issues, 55(3), 473–489.
14.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
15.
GillM. J. (2003). Biased against “them” more than “him”: Stereotype use in group-directed and individual-directed judgments. Social cognition, 21(5), 321–348.
16.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
17.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS. P.DittoP. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
HoA. K.KteilyN. S.ChenJ. M. (2020). Introducing the Sociopolitical Motive × Intergroup Threat model to understand how monoracial perceivers’ sociopolitical motives influence their categorization of multiracial people. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24, 260–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320917051
Jasinskaja-LahtiI.RenvikT. A.van der NollJ.EskelinenV.RohmannA.VerkuytenM. (2020). Dual citizenship and the perceived loyalty of immigrants. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23, 996–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219872809
24.
KellowayE. K.CatanoV. M.SouthwellR. R. (1992). The construct validity of union commitment: Development and dimensionality of a shorter scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00498.x
25.
KnowlesE. D.PengK. (2005). White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.223
26.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political psychology, 10, 257–274.
27.
KunstJ. R.ThomsenL.DovidioJ. F. (2018). Divided loyalties: Perceptions of disloyalty underpin bias toward dually-identified minority-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 807–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000168
28.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L. W.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.OuwerkerkJ. W.SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
29.
LyonsP. A.KenworthyJ. B.PopanJ. R. (2010). Ingroup identification and group-level narcissism as predictors of U.S. citizens’ attitudes and behavior toward Arab immigrants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210380604
30.
MischA.OverH.CarpenterM. (2014). Stick with your group: Young children’s attitudes about group loyalty. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.02.008
RatnaA. (2014). “Who are ya?” The national identities and belongings of British Asian football fans. Patterns of Prejudice, 48, 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2014.927603
34.
RemediosJ. D.ChasteenA. L.OeyE. (2012). “Unskilled” workers: Social skills stereotypes affect evaluations of biracial job applicants. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34, 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.674451
35.
RemnickD. (2010). The bridge: The life and rise of Barack Obama. Random House.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
38.
SejersenT. B. (2008). “I vow to thee my countries” – The expansion of dual citizenship in the 21st century. International Migration Review, 42, 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00136.x
39.
SidaniusJ.FeshbachS.LevinS.PrattoF. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102–133. https://doi.org/10.1086/297789
TravaglinoG. A.AbramsD.Randsley de MouraG.MarquesJ. M.PintoI. R. (2014). How groups react to disloyalty in the context of intergroup competition: Evaluations of group deserters and defectors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.006
43.
Van VugtM.HartC. M. (2004). Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.585
44.
WestA. L.ZhangR.YampolskyM. A.SasakiJ. Y. (2018). The potential cost of cultural fit: Frame switching undermines perceptions of authenticity in Western contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02622
YogeeswaranK.DasguptaN. (2010). Will the “real” American please stand up? The effect of implicit national prototypes on discriminatory behavior and judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1332–1345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210380928
47.
YukiM. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 166–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519846
48.
ZdaniukB.LevineJ. M. (2001). Group loyalty: Impact of members’ identification and contributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1474
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
