Stereotypes About Political Attitudes and Coalitions Among U.S. Racial Groups: Implications for Strategic Political Decision-Making

Abstract

What are people’s expectations of interracial political coalitions? This research reveals expectations of flexible interracial coalitions stemming from how policies and racial groups are viewed in terms of perceived status and foreignness. For policies seen as changing societal status (e.g., welfare), people expected Black–Hispanic political coalitions and viewed Asian Americans as more likely to align with Whites than with other minorities. For policies seen as impacting American identity (e.g., immigration), people expected Asian–Hispanic coalitions and that Black Americans would align with Whites more than other minorities. Manipulating a novel group’s alleged status and cultural assimilation influenced coalitional expectations, providing evidence of causality. These expectations appear to better reflect stereotypes than groups’ actual average policy attitudes and voting behavior. Yet these beliefs may have implications for a diversifying electorate as White Americans strategically amplified the political voice of a racial group expected to agree with their personal preferences on stereotyped policies.

Keywords

perceived coalitions intergroup relations stereotyping political psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AAPI. (2018). Affirmative action: Good or bad thing? https://aapidata.com/infographic-2018-affirmative-action-goodorbad/

ANES. (2018). American National Election Studies Time Series Cumulative Data File 1948-2016 [data file]. https://electionstudies.org/project/anes-time-series-cumulative-data-file/

Benjamin

(2017). Racial coalition building in local elections: Elite cues and cross-ethnic voting. Cambridge University Press.

Blalock

H. M.

(1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. John Wiley.

Blumer

(1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3–7.

Bobo

L. D.

(1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 445–472.

Borg

Groenen

P. J. F.

Mair

(2018). Applied multidimensional scaling and unfolding (2nd ed.). Springer.

Boudreau

Elmendorf

C. S.

MacKenzie

S. A.

(2019). Racial or spatial voting? The effects of candidate ethnicity and ethnic group endorsements in local elections. American Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 5–20.

Bowen

W. G.

Bok

(1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton University Press.

10.

Browning

R. P.

Marshall

D. R.

Tabb

D. H.

(1984). Protest is not enough: The struggle of Blacks and Hispanics for equality in Urban Politics. University of California Press.

11.

Bruner

J. S.

(1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.

12.

Caricati

(2018). Considering intermediate-status groups in intergroup hierarchies: A theory of triadic social stratification. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2(2), 58–66.

13.

Chambers

J. R.

Schlenker

B. R.

Collisson

(2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24(2), 140–149.

14.

Collingwood

(2020). Campaigning in a racially diversifying America: When and how cross-racial electoral mobilization works. Oxford University Press.

15.

Cortland

C. I.

Craig

M. A.

Shapiro

J. R.

Richeson

J. A.

Neel

Goldstein

N. J.

(2017). Solidarity through shared disadvantage: Highlighting shared experiences of discrimination improves relations between stigmatized groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 547–567.

16.

Craig

M. A.

Lee

M. M.

(in press). Status-based coalitions: Hispanic growth affects Whites’ perceptions of political support from Asian Americans. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211032286

17.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 759–777.

18.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the psychological foundations of conflict & coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 21–27.

19.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2018). Hispanic population growth engenders conservative shift among non-Hispanic racial minorities. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 383–392.

20.

Craig

M. A.

Rucker

J. M.

Richeson

J. A.

(2018). The pitfalls and promise of increasing racial diversity: Threat, contact, and race relations in the 21st century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 188–193.

21.

de la Garza

DeSipio

Garcia

F. C.

Garcia

Falcon

(1992). Latino voices: Mexican, Puerto Rican and Cuban perspectives on American politics. Westview.

22.

Dovidio

J. F.

Gluszek

John

M. S.

Ditlmann

Lagunes

(2010). Understanding bias toward Latinos: Discrimination, dimensions of difference, and experience of exclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 66(1), 59–78.

23.

EEOC. (1961). Executive Order 10925: Establishing the President’s Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/history/35th/thelaw/eo-10925.html

24.

Fernández

Branscombe

N. R.

Saguy

Gómez

Morales

J. F.

(2014). Higher moral obligations of tolerance toward other minorities: An extra burden on stigmatized groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(3), 1–14.

25.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Glick

(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.

26.

Fulton

S. A.

Gershon

S. A.

(2018). Too liberal to win? Race and voter perceptions of candidate ideology. American Politics Research, 46(5), 909–939.

27.

Furr

R. M.

Rosenthal

(2003a). Repeated-measures contrasts for “multiple-pattern” hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 8, 275–293.

28.

Furr

R. M.

Rosenthal

(2003b). Evaluating theories efficiently: The nuts and bolts of contrast analysis. Understanding Statistics, 2, 45–67.

29.

Hicks

W. D.

McKee

S. C.

Sellers

M. D.

Smith

D. A.

(2015). A principle or a strategy? Voter identification laws and partisan competition in the American states. Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 18–33.

30.

Hutchings

V. L.

Valentino

N. A.

(2004). The centrality of race in American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 383–408.

31.

Jacobsmeier

M. L.

(2015). From Black and White to left and right: Race, perceptions of candidates’ ideologies, and voting behavior in U.S. House elections. Political Behavior, 37, 595–621.

32.

Jones

P. E.

(2014). Revisiting stereotypes of non-White politicians’ ideological and partisan orientations. American Politics Research, 42(2), 283–310.

33.

Karau

S. J.

Williams

K. D.

(1995). Social loafing: Research findings, implications, and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 134–140.

34.

Kim

C. J.

(1999). The racial triangulation of Asian Americans. Politics & Society, 27(1), 105–138.

35.

Kinder

D. R.

Sanders

L. M.

(1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. University of Chicago Press.

36.

Koch

Imhoff

Dotsch

Unkelbach

Alves

(2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative/progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 675–709.

37.

LA Times. (1986). Los Angeles Times Poll: California General Election, Nov, 1986 [dataset]. USLAT1986-111, Version 1. Los Angeles Times [producer]. Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [distributor], accessed 25 July 2018.

38.

LA Times. (1994). Los Angeles Times Poll: California General Election Exit Poll, Nov, 1994 [dataset]. USLAT1994-350, Version 3. Los Angeles Times [producer]. Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [distributor], accessed 25 July 2018.

39.

LA Times. (1996). Los Angeles Times Poll: 1996 Exit Poll: National & California, Nov, 1996 [dataset]. USLAT1996-389, Version 3. Los Angeles Times [producer]. Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [distributor], accessed 25 July 2018.

40.

Lee

M. M.

Craig

M. A.

(2021). Perceptions of White allies’ (ulterior) motives in racially-diverse political coalitions.[Manuscript in preparation].

41.

Lindert

P. H.

(2004). Growing public: Social spending and economic growth since the eighteenth century. Cambridge University Press.

42.

Masuoka

Junn

(2013). The politics of belonging: Race, public opinion, and immigration. University of Chicago Press.

43.

McDermott

M. L.

(1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(4), 895–918.

44.

Morey

B. N.

(2018). Mechanisms by which anti-immigrant stigma exacerbates racial/ethnic health disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 108(4), 460–463.

45.

National Election Pool (ABC News/Associated Press/CBS News/CNN/Fox News/NBC News). (2012). National Election Pool Poll # 2012-STELEC-CA: California Election Day Exit Poll, Nov, 2012 [dataset]. USMI2012-STELEC-CA. Edison Media Research [producer]. Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [distributor], accessed 25 July 2018.

46.

Okamoto

D. G.

(2003). Toward a theory of panethnicity: Explaining Asian American collective action. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 811–842.

47.

Pew Research Center. (2014, June 12). Political polarization in the American public. http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/

48.

Rothschild

J. E.

Howat

A. J.

Shafranek

R. M.

Busby

E. C.

(2019). Pigeonholing Partisans: Stereotypes of Party Supporters and Partisan Polarization. Political Behavior, 41, 423–443.

49.

Saguy

Fernández

Branscombe

N. R.

Shany

(2020). Justice agents: Discriminated group members are perceived to be highly committed to social justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(1), 155–167.

50.

Sanchez

D. T.

Chaney

K. E.

Manuel

S. K.

Remedios

J. D.

(2018). Theory of prejudice and American identity threat transfer for Latino and Asian Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 972–983.

51.

Schildkraut

D. J.

(2003). American identity and attitudes toward official-English policies. Political Psychology, 24(3), 469–499.

52.

Tichenor

(2002). Dividing lines: The politics of immigration control in America. Princeton University Press.

53.

Visalvanich

(2017a). Asian candidates in America: The surprising effects of positive racial stereotyping. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 68–81.

54.

Visalvanich

(2017b). When does race matter? Exploring white responses to minority congressional candidates. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(4), 618–641.

55.

Warner

R. H.

Branscombe

N. R.

(2012). Observer perceptions of moral obligations in groups with a history of victimization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 882–894.

56.

Weiser

W. R.

Feldman

(2018, June). The state of voting 2018. Brennan Center for Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/publications/2018_06_StateOfVoting_v5%20%281%29.pdf

57.

Winter

N. J. G.

(2008). Dangerous frames: How ideas about race and gender shape public opinion. University of Chicago Press.

58.

Zou

L. X.

Cheryan

(2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 696–717.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.14 MB

7.06 MB