Research indicates that the memory of collective trauma influences attitudes towards contemporary social and political issues. We suggest that the specific attributions for trauma that members of victim and perpetrator groups make provide a more nuanced understanding of this relationship. Thus, we constructed and validated a measure of attributions for the Holocaust. Then, we ran a preregistered study on representative samples in Germany (N = 504) and Israel (N = 469) to examine whether attributing the Holocaust to essentialist or contextual causes influences attitudes towards the immigration crisis and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Results indicated that, among Germans, attributing the Holocaust to German character was associated with positive attitudes to immigration via collective guilt. Among Israelis, attributions to German character were associated with negative attitudes to non-Jewish immigration, a hawkish stance in the Palestinian–Israeli conflict, and pro-Israel attitudes via a sense of perpetual victimization. Results reveal how attributions about past trauma affect contemporary social and political attitudes among victims and perpetrators.
BilaliR.TroppL. R.DasguptaN. (2012). Attributions of responsibility and perceived harm in the aftermath of mass violence. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18(1), 21–39. 10.1037/a0026671
7.
BilaliR.VollhardtJ. R. (2019). Victim and perpetrator groups’ divergent perspectives on collective violence: Implications for intergroup relations. Political Psychology, 40, 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12570
8.
BouchatP.LicataL.RosouxV.AlleschC.AmmererH.BovinaI.BruckmüllerS.CabecinhasR.ChryssochoouX.CohrsJ. C.CsertőI.DelouvéeS.DuranteF.Ernst-VintilaA.FlassbeckC.HiltonD.KestelootC.KisliogluR.KrennA.. . . KleinO. (2017). A century of victimhood: Antecedents and current impacts of perceived suffering in World War I across Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2232
9.
BranscombeN.SlugoskiB.KappenD. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In BranscombeN.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 16–34). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139106931.004
10.
BrownR.CehajicS. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.466
CampbellM.VollhardtJ. R. (2014). Fighting the good fight: The relationship between belief in evil and support for violent policies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167213500997
13.
CanettiD.HirschbergerG.RapaportC.Elad-StrengerJ.Ein-DorT.RosenzveigS.HobfollS. E. (2018). Collective trauma from the lab to the real world: The effects of the holocaust on contemporary Israeli political cognitions. Political Psychology, 39, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12384
14.
CastanoE.Giner-SorollaR. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804–818. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804
15.
CohenF.JussimL.HarberK. D.BhasinG. (2009). Modern anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 290–306. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0015338
16.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.142
17.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 872–886. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872
18.
FergusonM. A.BranscombeN. R. (2014). The social psychology of collective guilt. In von ScheveC.SalmellaM. (Eds.), Collective emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology (pp. 251–265). Oxford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659180.003.0017
19.
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505–520.
GrzebykP. (2017). Amendments of January 2018 to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance–Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation in Light of International Law. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 37, 287–300.
22.
HammackP. L. (2009). Exploring the reproduction of conflict through narrative: Israeli youth motivated to participate in a coexistence program. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15(1), 49–74. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/2326-3598.1.S.62
23.
HankeK.LiuJ. H.HiltonD. J.BilewiczM.GarberI.HuangL.WangF. (2013). When the past haunts the present: Intergroup forgiveness and historical closure in post World War II societies in Asia and in Europe. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 287–301. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.05.003
24.
HanrettyC.LauderdaleB. E.VivyanN. (2018). Comparing strategies for estimating constituency opinion from national survey samples. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(3), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.79
HirschbergerG.Ein-DorT.LeidnerB.SaguyT. (2016). How is existential threat related to intergroup conflict? Introducing the multidimensional existential threat (MET) model. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1877. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2016.01877
27.
HirschbergerG.HayesJ.ShtrulA.Ein-DorT. (2017). The existential underpinnings of intergroup helping: When normative and defensive motivations collide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(10), 1469–1484. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167217718524
28.
HirschbergerG.KendeA.WeinsteinS. (2016). Defensive representations of an uncomfortable history: The case of Hungary and the Holocaust. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 55, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.08.006
29.
HirschbergerG.LifshinU.SeemanS.Ein-DorT.PyszczynskiT. (2017). When criticism is ineffective: The case of historical trauma and unsupportive allies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2253
30.
ImhoffR.BanseR. (2009). Ongoing victim suffering increases prejudice: The case of secondary antisemitism. Psychological Science, 20, 1443–1447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02457.x
31.
ImhoffR.BilewiczM.ErbH.-P. (2012). Collective guilt versus collective regret: Different emotional reactions to in-group atrocities. European Journal for Social Psychology, 42, 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1886
32.
ImhoffR.BilewiczM.HankeK.KahnD. T.Henkel-GuembelN.HalabiS.HirschbergerG. (2017). Explaining the inexplicable: Differences in attributions to the Holocaust in Germany, Israel and Poland. Political Psychology, 38, 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12348
33.
ImhoffR.LambertyP.KleinO. (2018). Using power as a negative cue: How conspiracy mentality affects epistemic trust in sources of historical knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1364–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218768779
34.
ImhoffR.MesserM. (2019). In search of experimental evidence for secondary antisemitism: A file drawer report. Meta-Psychology, 3, MP.2018.880.
35.
ImhoffR.WohlM.ErbH.-P. (2013). When the past is far from dead: How ongoing consequences of genocides committed by the ingroup impact collective guilt. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 74–91. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/josi.12004
36.
KlarY.Schori-EyalN.KlarY. (2013). The “never again” state of Israel: The emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 125–143. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/josi.12007
37.
KleinR. A.RatliffK. A.VianelloM.AdamsR. B.JrBahníkŠ.BernsteinM. J.BocianK.BrandtM. J.BrooksB.BrumbaughC. C.CemalcilarZ.ChandlerJ.CheongW.DavisW. E.DevosT.EisnerM.FrankowskaN.FurrowD.GallianiE. M.. . . NosekB. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152.
38.
KochA.ImhoffR.DotschR.UnkelbachC.AlvesH. (2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socio-economic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 675–709. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspa0000046
39.
LeachC. W.ZeineddineF. B.Čehajić-ClancyS. (2013). Moral immemorial: The rarity of self-criticism for previous generations’ genocide or mass violence. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 34–53. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/josi.12002
40.
LedesmaR. D.Valero-MoraP. (2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/wjnc-nm63
LiuJ. H.HiltonD. J. (2005). How the past weighs on the present: Social representations of history and their role in identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X27162
43.
MazurL. B.VollhardtJ. R. (2016). The prototypicality of genocide: Implications for international intervention. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 16(1), 290–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12099
44.
McGartyC.PedersenA.LeachC. W.MansellT.WallerJ.BliucA. M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X18974
45.
MeromG. (2017). Israeli perceptions of the Iranian nuclear threat. Political Science Quarterly, 132(1), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12574
46.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 351–374.
47.
PettigrewT. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014616727900500407
48.
ReesJ. H.AllpressJ. A.BrownR. (2013). Nie Wieder: Group-based emotions for in-group wrongdoing affect attitudes toward unrelated minorities. Political Psychology, 34, 387–407. 10.1111/pops.12003
49.
RiméB.BouchatP.KleinO.LicataL. (2015). When collective memories of victimhood fade: Generational evolution of intergroup attitudes and political aspirations in Belgium. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(4), 515–532.
50.
RoslerN.BranscombeN. R. (2019). Inclusivity of past collective trauma and its implications for current intractable conflict: The mediating role of moral lessons. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12336.
51.
RothschildZ. K.LandauM. J.MolinaL. E.BranscombeN. R.SullivanD. (2013). Displacing blame over the ingroup’s harming of a disadvantaged group can fuel moral outrage at a third-party scapegoat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 898–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.005
52.
Schori-EyalN.KlarY.Ben-AmiY. (2017b). Perpetual ingroup victimhood as a distorted lens: Effects on attribution and categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2250
53.
Schori-EyalN.KlarY.RoccasS.McNeillA. (2017a). The shadows of the past: Effects of historical group trauma on reactions to current intergroup conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167216689063
54.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116
55.
VollhardtJ. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace?Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 135–159. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10781910802544373
56.
VollhardtJ. R. (2012). Collective victimization. In TroppL. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 136–157). Oxford University Press.
57.
VollhardtJ. R. (2013). “Crime against humanity” or “Crime against Jews”? Acknowledgment in construals of the Holocaust and its importance for intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 144–161. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/josi.12008
58.
VollhardtJ. R.NairR.TroppL. R. (2016). Inclusive victim consciousness predicts minority group members’ support for refugees and immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(6), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12368
59.
WarnerR. H.BranscombeN. R. (2012). Observer perceptions of moral obligations in groups with a history of victimization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7), 882–894. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167212439212
60.
WarnerR. H.WohlM. J.BranscombeN. R. (2014). When do victim group members feel a moral obligation to help suffering others?European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2010
61.
WeinerB. (1986). Attribution, emotion, and action. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 281–312). Guilford Press.
62.
WohlM. J.BranscombeN. R. (2008). Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 988–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.988
63.
WohlM. J. A.ReederG. D. (2004). When bad deeds are forgiven: Judgments of morality and forgiveness for intergroup aggression. In MorganJ. P. (Ed.), Focus on aggression research (pp. 59–74). Nova Science Publishers.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
